A Comparative Study of the Various Mean Stress-Based Fatigue Life Prediction Models for 880-Grade Indian Rail Steel in Presence of Ratcheting Phenomenon

被引:1
作者
Yadav, Raj Kumar [1 ]
Ajit, K. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol ISM, Dept Min Machinery Engn, Dhanbad 826004, Jharkhand, India
关键词
Ratcheting life; Fatigue life prediction models; Stress deviation; Asymmetric cyclic stressing; 880-grade rail steel; STAINLESS-STEEL; AISI; 316L; STRENGTH; MICROSTRUCTURE; TERMS; CREEP;
D O I
10.1007/s12666-021-02452-x
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
In this work, the efficacy of various existing mean stress-based prediction models to estimate fatigue life in the presence of ratcheting phenomena is compared with the experimentally observed life for the 880-grade rail steel. A set of 14 existing stress-based life prediction models have been considered in this investigation. This investigation reveals that all linear models provide conservative predictions, and the Half-slope model has the better efficacy with a stress deviation of 0.0364. On the contrary, the fatigue life estimated by exponential models (i.e. ASME, Bagci, and Gerber) are on the non-conservative side, and the prediction by the ASME model has a stress deviation of 0.0430. Among all the models, the Dietman model predicts ratcheting life with the 2nd best estimate having a stress deviation of 0.0289. However, the prediction efficacy of the Walker model, which has merely a stress deviation of 0.0090, is the best compared to all the other methods considered here. This is because the prediction by the Walker model depends on the adjustable material parameter, gamma, which is derived by multiple linear regression of the data collected from ratcheting experiments under asymmetric cyclic stress. Nevertheless, this dependency may make this efficient model an unfavorable option for many designers, as obtaining the c requires several complex and tedious experimentations.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 588
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, STANDARD TEST METHOD
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, E606E606M191 ASTM
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1968, Fatigue Design Flandbook- Advances in Engineering
  • [4] A unified material model to predict ratcheting response in head-hardened rail steel due to non-uniform hardness distributions
    Athukorala, Asitha C.
    De Pellegrin, Dennis V.
    Kourousis, Kyriakos I.
    [J]. TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 111 : 26 - 38
  • [5] Characterisation of head-hardened rail steel in terms of cyclic plasticity response and microstructure for improved material modelling
    Athukorala, Asitha C.
    De Pellegrin, Dennis V.
    Kourousis, Kyriakos I.
    [J]. WEAR, 2016, 366 : 416 - 424
  • [7] Basquin OH, 1910, P AM SOC TEST MAT, V10, P625
  • [8] Bayer, 1874, ARCHIT ING VER, V6, P101
  • [9] Bridgman, 1943, 25 ANN CONV SOC CHIC
  • [10] Rail defects: an overview
    Cannon, DF
    Edel, KO
    Grassie, SL
    Sawley, K
    [J]. FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 2003, 26 (10) : 865 - 886