Biomechanical comparison of single- and dual-lead pedicle screws in cadaveric spine

被引:21
作者
Jacob, Arun T. [1 ]
Ingalhalikar, Aditya V. [2 ]
Morgan, John H. [2 ]
Channon, Scott [2 ]
Lim, Tae-Hong [2 ]
Torner, James C. [3 ,4 ]
Hitchon, Patrick W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Neurosurg, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Biomed Engn, Iowa City, IA USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Epidemiol, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Vet Adm & Med Ctr, Carver Coll Med, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
biomechanical study; bone mineral density; dual-lead pedicle screw; pullout force; single-lead pedicle screw;
D O I
10.3171/SPI-08/01/052
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. The pedicle screw (PS) is the cornerstone of spinal instrumentation, and its failure often entails additional surgery. Screw pullout is one of the most common reasons for screw failure, particularly in the elderly population. In this study the authors undertook a biomechanical comparison of the maximum pullout force (MPF) required for single- and dual-lead PSs in cadaver vertebrae. Methods. Radiographs of 40 cadaveric vertebrae (T11-L5) were obtained, and bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the lateral plane using dual-x-ray absorptiometry with a bone densitometer. One screw of each design was implanted for side-by-side comparison. Vertebrae were potted and mounted on an MTS test frame for accurate measurement of MPF A total of 80 PSs were tested, 40 each of single- and dual-lead design types. Results. The average MPF for dual-lead screws (533.89 +/- 285.7 N) was comparable to that of single-lead screws (524.90 +/- 311.6 N) (p = 0.3733). The BMD had a significant correlation with MPF for both dual-lead (r = 0.56413, p < 0.0001) and single-lead screws (r = 0.56327, p < 0.0001). Conclusions. Barring the effect of BMD, this in vitro biomechanical test showed no significant difference in MPF between single- and dual-lead PSs. Dual-lead PSs can be used to achieve a faster insertion time, without compromising pullout force.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 57
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF PEDICLE SCREW INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS IN A CORPECTOMY MODEL [J].
ASHMAN, RB ;
GALPIN, RD ;
CORIN, JD ;
JOHNSTON, CE .
SPINE, 1989, 14 (12) :1398-1405
[2]   UNSTABLE THORACOLUMBAR AND LUMBAR BURST FRACTURES TREATED WITH THE AO FIXATEUR INTERNE [J].
BENSON, DR ;
BURKUS, JK ;
MONTESANO, PX ;
SUTHERLAND, TB ;
MCLAIN, RF .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1992, 5 (03) :335-343
[3]  
CARL AL, 1992, SPINE, V17, P317
[4]  
Cook S D, 2001, Spine J, V1, P109, DOI 10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00020-1
[5]   Biomechanical evaluation and preliminary clinical experience with an expansive pedicle screw design [J].
Cook, SD ;
Salkeld, SL ;
Whitecloud, TS ;
Barbera, J .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 2000, 13 (03) :230-236
[6]   STATIC AND CYCLICAL BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF PEDICLE SCREW SPINAL CONSTRUCTS [J].
CUNNINGHAM, BW ;
SEFTER, JC ;
SHONO, Y ;
MCAFEE, PC .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (12) :1677-1688
[7]   TRANSPEDICULAR SCREW-ROD FIXATION OF THE LUMBAR SPINE - OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE AND OUTCOME IN 104 CASES [J].
DICKMAN, CA ;
FESSLER, RG ;
MACMILLAN, M ;
HAID, RW .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1992, 77 (06) :860-870
[8]  
Ebelke DK, 1991, SPINE, V16, P428
[9]   EFFECTS OF BONE-MINERAL DENSITY ON PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION [J].
HALVORSON, TL ;
KELLEY, LA ;
THOMAS, KA ;
WHITECLOUD, TS ;
COOK, SD .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (21) :2415-2420
[10]  
Hernigou P, 1996, J SPINAL DISORD, V9, P322