Use of a Viral Filter to Reduce Exposure to Exhaled Aerosol Does Not Affect Methacholine Dose Delivery During Bronchoprovocation Testing
被引:0
|
作者:
Subat, Yosuf W.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USAMayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
Subat, Yosuf W.
[1
]
Meyer, Todd J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Mayo Clin, Resp Care, Rochester, MN 55905 USAMayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
Meyer, Todd J.
[2
]
Torgerud, Keith D.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Mayo Clin, Resp Care & Cardiopulm Diagnost, La Crosse, WI USAMayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
Torgerud, Keith D.
[3
]
Lim, Kaiser G.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USAMayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
Lim, Kaiser G.
[1
]
Scanlon, Paul D.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USAMayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
Scanlon, Paul D.
[1
]
Niven, Alexander S.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USAMayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
Niven, Alexander S.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Resp Care, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Resp Care & Cardiopulm Diagnost, La Crosse, WI USA
BACKGROUND: Methacholine challenge testing (MCT) is a common bronchoprovocation technique used to assess airway hyper-responsiveness. We previously demonstrated that the addition of a viral filter to the nebulizer exhalation limb substantially reduced expelled particles during MCT. Our aim was to evaluate whether this modification affects the delivered dose of methacholine. METHODS: A mechanical ventilator was connected to a lung simulator with breathing frequency 15 breaths/min, tidal volume 500 mL, inspiratory-expiratory ratio 1:1, with a sinusoidal waveform. We compared methacholine dose delivery using the Hudson Micro Mist or AeroEclipse II BAN nebulizers powered by either a dry gas source or a compressor system. A filter placed in line between the nebulizer and test lung was weighed before and after 1 min of nebulized methacholine delivery. Mean inhaled mass was measured with and without a viral filter on the exhalation limb. Dose delivery was calculated by multiplying the mean inhaled mass by the respirable fraction (particles < 5 mu m) and inhalation time. Unpaired t test was used to compare methacholine dose delivery with and without viral filter placement. RESULTS: The addition of a viral filter did not significantly affect methacholine dose delivery across all devices tested. Using a 50-psi dry gas source, dose delivered with or without a viral filter did not differ with the Hudson (422.3 mu g vs 282.0 mu g, P = .11) or the AeroEclipse nebulizer (563.0 mu g vs 657.6 mu g, P = .59). Using the compressor, dose delivered with and without a viral filter did not differ with the Hudson (974.0 mu g vs 868.0 mu g, P = .03) or the AeroEclipse nebulizer (818.0 mu g vs 628.5 mu g, P =.42). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a viral filter to the nebulizer exhalation limb did not affect methacholine dose during bronchoprovocation testing. Routine use of a viral filter should be considered to improve pulmonary function technician safety and infection control measures during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.