A bibliometric analysis of leading universities in innovation research

被引:87
作者
Cancino, Christian A. [1 ]
Merigo, Jose M. [1 ]
Coronado, Freddy C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Dept Management Control & Informat Syst, Ave Diagonal Paraguay 257, Santiago 8330015, Chile
来源
JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE | 2017年 / 2卷 / 03期
关键词
Innovation; Bibliometrics; University analysis; Web of science; BUSINESS SCHOOLS; 4; DECADES; MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGY; PERSPECTIVE; PERFORMANCE; ECONOMICS; EVOLUTION; RANKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.jik.2017.03.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The number of innovation studies with a management perspective has grown considerably over the last 25 years. This study identified the universities that are most productive and influential in innovation research. The leading innovation research journals were also studied individually to identify the most productive universities for each journal. Data from the Web of Science were analyzed. Studies that were published between 1989 and 2013 were filtered first by the keyword "innovation" and second by 18 management-related research areas. The results indicate that US universities are the most productive and influential because they account for the most publications with a high number of citations and high-h-index. Following advances in the productivity of numerous European journals, however, universities from the UK and the Netherlands are the most involved in publishing in journals that specialize in innovation research. (C) 2017 Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 124
页数:19
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   Innovation studies-The emerging structure of a new scientific field [J].
Fagerberg, Jan ;
Verspagen, Bart .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (02) :218-233
[12]   An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output [J].
Hirsch, JE .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (46) :16569-16572
[13]   Perspective: Ranking business schools on the management of technology [J].
Linton, JD .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2004, 21 (06) :416-430
[14]   The evolution of science policy and innovation studies [J].
Martin, Ben R. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (07) :1219-1239
[15]   An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators [J].
Merigo, Jose M. ;
Gil-Lafuente, Anna M. ;
Yager, Ronald R. .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 27 :420-433
[16]   The evolution of performance measurement research - Developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next [J].
Neely, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2005, 25 (12) :1264-1277
[17]  
Norton M.J., 2001, INTRO CONCEPTS INFOR
[18]   Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century [J].
Podsakoff, Philip M. ;
MacKenzie, Scott B. ;
Podsakoff, Nathan P. ;
Bachrach, Daniel G. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2008, 34 (04) :641-720
[19]  
PRITCHARD A, 1969, J DOC, V25, P348
[20]   How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management [J].
Rafols, Ismael ;
Leydesdorff, Loet ;
O'Hare, Alice ;
Nightingale, Paul ;
Stirling, Andy .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (07) :1262-1282