Cost and performance of CSP and PV plants of capacity above 100 MW operating in the United States of America

被引:25
作者
Boretti, Alberto [1 ]
Castelletto, Stefania [2 ]
机构
[1] Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd Univ, Deanship Res, Al Khobar 34754, Saudi Arabia
[2] Royal Melbourne Inst Technol RMIT Univ, Sch Engn, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
关键词
THERMAL POWER-PLANTS; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ref.2021.07.006
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This work aims to compare the cost and performance of Photovoltaic (PV) and Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) solar plants utility-size >100 MW built in the United States (US) and model predictions to forecast their optimal synergetic use in a near-future solar (and wind) only grid. There are in the country very few CSP, and many more PV plants, that are representative of the latest technologies. The largest number of PV plants is the result of the cost advantage and better technology-readiness, compared to the mistakenly promoted CSP solar tower (ST) with thermal energy storage (TES) plants, while neglecting the CSP parabolic trough (PT), and not factoring dispatchability. Without TES, CSP PT could provide comparable performances, at an acceptable cost, reaching the mass production of current PV technology. The addition of TES, still suffering from maturity issues, adds dispatchability, is a huge added value but at increased cost and reduced reliability. It is concluded that further technological progress and mass production of CSP, both PT and ST, with further expanded TES, is needed, targeting dispatchability. These plants should be coupled to PV production during the daytime to progress towards a stable solar energy supply with limited external battery energy storage.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 98
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Solar power technology for electricity generation: A critical review [J].
Ahmadi, Mohammad Hossein ;
Ghazvini, Mahyar ;
Sadeghzadeh, Milad ;
Nazari, Mohammad Alhuyi ;
Kumar, Ravinder ;
Naeimi, Abbas ;
Ming, Tingzhen .
ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2018, 6 (05) :340-361
[2]  
Ahmed T., 2019, 2019 INT C EL COMP C, P1, DOI [10.1109/ECACE.2019.8679173, DOI 10.1109/ECACE.2019.8679173]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Form EIA-860 detailed data with previous form data (EIA-860A/860B)
[4]  
Boretti A, ENERGY, V3
[5]   Concentrating solar power tower technology: present status and outlook [J].
Boretti, Albert ;
Castelletto, Stefania ;
Al-Zubaidy, Sarim .
NONLINEAR ENGINEERING - MODELING AND APPLICATION, 2019, 8 (01) :10-31
[6]   Concentrated Solar Power Solar Tower with Oversized Solar Field and Molten Salt Thermal Energy Storage Working at an Annual Average Capacity Factor of 95% in NEOM City [J].
Boretti, Alberto ;
Castelletto, Stefania .
ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 9 (04)
[7]   Computation of storage power and energy to stabilize a wind-and-solar-only Australian National Electricity Market grid [J].
Boretti, Alberto ;
Nayfeh, Jamal ;
Al-Kouz, Wael .
ENERGY STORAGE, 2021, 3 (01)
[8]   Energy storage requirements to address wind energy variability [J].
Boretti, Alberto .
ENERGY STORAGE, 2019, 1 (05)
[9]   Energy storage needs for an Australian national electricity market grid without combustion fuels [J].
Boretti, Alberto .
ENERGY STORAGE, 2020, 2 (01)
[10]   Cost and production of solar thermal and solar photovoltaics power plants in the United States [J].
Boretti A. .
Renewable Energy Focus, 2018, 26 :93-99