Centralisation of cancer surgery and the impact on patients' travel burden

被引:27
作者
Versteeg, S. E. [1 ]
Ho, V. K. Y. [2 ]
Siesling, S. [2 ,3 ]
Varkevisser, M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res NIVEL, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org IKNL, Dept Res, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Twente, Tech Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Technol & Serv Res, Enschede, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Univ, ESHPM, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Centralisation; Travel burden; Cancer surgery; HIGH-VOLUME HOSPITALS; HEALTH-CARE; OPERATIVE MORTALITY; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOMES; REGIONALIZATION; COMPETITION; QUALITY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.07.002
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Recent years have seen increasing trends towards centralisation of complex medical procedures, including cancer surgery. The impact of these trends on patients' travel burden is often ignored. This study charts the effects of different scenarios of centralising surgery on the travel burden for patients with cancer of the digestive tract, particularly among vulnerable patient groups. Our analyses include all surgically treated Dutch patients with colorectal, stomach or oesophageal cancer diagnosed in 2012-2013. After determining each patient's actual travel burden, simulations explored the impact of continued centralisation of cancer surgery under four hypothetical scenarios. Compared to patients' actual travelling, simulated travel distances under relatively 'conservative' scenarios did not necessarily increase, most likely due to current hospital bypassing. Using multivariable regression analyses, as a first exercise, it is examined whether the potential effects on travel burden differ across patient groups. For some cancer types, under more extreme scenarios increases in travel distances are significantly higher for older patients and those with a low SES. Given the potential impact on vulnerable patients' travel burden, our analysis suggests a thorough consideration of non-clinical effects of centralisation in health policy. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1028 / 1034
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Patient Mobility for Elective Secondary Health Care Services in Response to Patient Choice Policies: A Systematic Review [J].
Aggarwal, Ajay ;
Lewis, Daniel ;
Mason, Malcolm ;
Sullivan, Richard ;
van der Meulen, Jan .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2017, 74 (04) :379-403
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GEODAN DRIVE TIME MA
[3]   The European Union Committee of Experts on Rare Diseases: three productive years at the service of the rare disease community [J].
Ayme, Segolene ;
Rodwell, Charlotte .
ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2014, 9
[4]   Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery [J].
Begg, CB ;
Cramer, LD ;
Hoskins, WJ ;
Brennan, MF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (20) :1747-1751
[5]   Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Marth, NJ ;
Goodman, DC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (20) :2703-2708
[6]   Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Finlayson, EVA ;
Stukel, TA ;
Lucas, FL ;
Batista, I ;
Welch, HG ;
Wennberg, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1128-1137
[7]   Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery [J].
Birkmeyer, John D. ;
Sun, Yating ;
Wong, Sandra L. ;
Stukel, Therese A. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 245 (05) :777-783
[8]   The practice-makes-perfect hypothesis in the context of other production concepts in health care [J].
Gandjour, A ;
Lauterbach, KW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2003, 18 (04) :171-175
[9]  
Hentschker C, 2015, HEALTH ECON, V24, P644
[10]   Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: Importance in quality of cancer care [J].
Hillner, BE ;
Smith, TJ ;
Desch, CE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (11) :2327-2340