Charter movement controversy: an American public charter school case study

被引:2
作者
Mullen, Carol A. [1 ]
Bartlett, Tara C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Coll Liberal Arts & Human Sci, Sch Educ Educ Leadership & Policy Studies Program, VTCRC 1750 Kraft Dr Blacksburg, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Stanley Elementary Sch, Page Cty Publ Sch, Stanley, VA USA
关键词
Case study; charter school movement; policy; public charter school; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1080/20004508.2022.2112420
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Controversy is intensifying with the rapid spread of charter schools and their domination of the education reform agenda. As charter enrolment increases in the USA, inequities in education worsen. This article contributes to the debate on contemporary education policy by critically examining charter issues from the US literature and stakeholder data. We add insights to research on charter controversy from public discourse and stakeholder groups. Our narrative animates pros and cons in the charter debate through stakeholders' eyes, in effect contributing voices from the field. A case study of a public charter school in Virginia provides a revealing prism for understanding charter schools. Content analysis was performed on data from nine interviews held during the pandemic with founding members (parents, etc.). As found, the charter narrative of success and struggle around public perception, racial equity, segregation, funding, approval, effectiveness, and accreditation was a schoolstory. Charter policy effects on social groups - parents, teachers, community members, and leaders - in their association with the charter's evolution were identifiable. The conflicting views resonate with polarising tensions nationwide. Regarding international implications of the analysis, the move to privatise and reform public education through independent schools with autonomy continues to impact European countries.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 384
页数:18
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Abrams S.E., 2016, Education and the Commercial Mindset
  • [2] Alexiadou N., 2013, Education Inquiry, V4, P413
  • [3] Explaining Charter School Effectiveness
    Angrist, Joshua D.
    Pathak, Parag A.
    Walters, Christopher R.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2013, 5 (04) : 1 - 27
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, [No title captured]
  • [5] Ball S.J., 1996, J EDUC POLICY, V11, P89, DOI DOI 10.1080/0268093960110105
  • [6] A different type of charter school: in prestige charters, a rise in cachet equals a decline in access
    Brown, Elizabeth
    Makris, Molly Vollman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION POLICY, 2018, 33 (01) : 85 - 117
  • [7] Buckley J., 2011, J SCH CHOICE, V5, P40, DOI [DOI 10.1080/15582159.2011.548242, 10.1080/15582159.2011]
  • [8] Charter Collaborative,, COLL ACT COAL
  • [9] Chasmar J., 2013, WASHINGTON TIME 0619
  • [10] County of San Francisco, 2020, SENATE BILL 310 JURY