Newer-Generation Ultrathin Strut Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Older Second-Generation Thicker Strut Drug-Eluting Stents for Coronary Artery Disease Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

被引:241
作者
Bangalore, Sripal [1 ]
Toklu, Bora [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Patel, Neil [2 ]
Feit, Frederick [1 ]
Stone, Gregg W. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[2] Mt Sinai Beth Israel Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[3] Columbia Univ, New York Presbyterian Hosp, Med Ctr, Bronx, NY 10027 USA
[4] Cardiovasc Res Fdn, Bronx, NY USA
[5] Montefiore Med Ctr, Bronx, NY USA
[6] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
coronary artery disease; drug-eluting stents; percutaneous coronary intervention; stents; treatment outcome; DURABLE POLYMER; ANGIOGRAPHIC OUTCOMES; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; NON-INFERIORITY; RISK; MULTICENTER; THROMBOSIS; THIN;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034456
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Contemporary second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have superior efficacy and safety in comparison with early-generation stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, in part, related to their thinner struts. Whether newer-generation ultrathin DES further improve clinical outcomes in comparison with older second-generation thicker strut DES is unknown. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized clinical trials that compared newer-generation ultrathin strut DES (defined as strut thickness <70 mu m) versus thicker strut second-generation DES and reported clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) evaluated at 1-year follow-up. Tests for subgroup effects based on the ultrathin strut DES type and the comparator DES type were performed by using meta-regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 10 trials that randomly assigned 11 658 patients and evaluated 3 newer-generation ultrathin strut DES: Orsiro stent (60 mu m), MiStent (64 mu m), and BioMime (65 mu m). In comparison with thicker strut second-generation DES, newer-generation ultrathin strut DES were associated with a 16% reduction in target lesion failure (relative risk, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.99) driven by less myocardial infarction (relative risk, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.99). Ultrathin strut DES were also associated with qualitatively lower rates of any stent thrombosis (relative risk, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-1.01). Tests for subgroup effects based on the ultrathin strut DES type (P=0.58) and the comparator DES type (P=0.98) were not significant, suggesting consistent outcomes across the 3 ultrathin strut DES and with the different DES comparators. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, newer-generation ultrathin strut DES further improve 1-year clinical outcomes in comparison with contemporary thicker strut second-generation DES.
引用
收藏
页码:2216 / 2226
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, BMJ BRIT MED J, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.F6625
[2]   The State of the Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffold Consensus From an Expert Panel [J].
Bangalore, Sripal ;
Bezerra, Hiram G. ;
Rizik, David G. ;
Armstrong, Ehrin J. ;
Samuels, Bruce ;
Naidu, Srihari S. ;
Grines, Cindy L. ;
Foster, Malcolm T. ;
Choi, James W. ;
Bertolet, Barry D. ;
Shah, Atman P. ;
Torguson, Rebecca ;
Avula, Surendra B. ;
Wang, John C. ;
Zidar, James P. ;
Maksoud, Aziz ;
Kalyanasundaram, Arun ;
Yakubov, Steven J. ;
Chehab, Bassem M. ;
Spaedy, Anthony J. ;
Potluri, Srini P. ;
Caputo, Ronald P. ;
Kondur, Ashok ;
Merritt, Robert F. ;
Kaki, Amir ;
Quesada, Ramon ;
Parikh, Manish A. ;
Toma, Catalin ;
Matar, Fadi ;
DeGregorio, Joseph ;
Nicholson, William ;
Batchelor, Wayne ;
Gollapudi, Raghava ;
Korngold, Ethan ;
Sumar, Riyaz ;
Chrysant, George S. ;
Li, Jun ;
Gordon, John B. ;
Dave, Rajesh M. ;
Attizzani, Guilherme F. ;
Stys, Tom P. ;
Gigliotti, Osvaldo S. ;
Murphy, Bruce E. ;
Ellis, Stephen G. ;
Waksman, Ron .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (23) :2349-2359
[3]   Outcomes with various drug eluting or bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: mixed treatment comparison analysis of 22 844 patient years of follow-up from randomised trials [J].
Bangalore, Sripal ;
Kumar, Sunil ;
Fusaro, Mario ;
Amoroso, Nicholas ;
Kirtane, Ajay J. ;
Byrne, Robert A. ;
Williams, David O. ;
Slater, James ;
Cutlip, Donald E. ;
Feit, Frederick .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
[4]   Short- and Long-Term Outcomes With Drug-Eluting and Bare-Metal Coronary Stents A Mixed-Treatment Comparison Analysis of 117 762 Patient-Years of Follow-Up From Randomized Trials [J].
Bangalore, Sripal ;
Kumar, Sunil ;
Fusaro, Mario ;
Amoroso, Nicholas ;
Attubato, Michael J. ;
Feit, Frederick ;
Bhatt, Deepak L. ;
Slater, James .
CIRCULATION, 2012, 125 (23) :2873-+
[5]   Basics of meta-analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity [J].
Borenstein, Michael ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Hedges, Larry V. ;
Rothstein, Hannah R. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2017, 8 (01) :5-18
[6]   A sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer-coated stent (MiStent) versus an everolimus-eluting durable polymer stent (Xience) after percutaneous coronary intervention (DESSOLVE III): a randomised, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial [J].
de Winter, Robbert J. ;
Katagiri, Yuki ;
Asano, Taku ;
Milewski, Krzysztof P. ;
Lurz, Philipp ;
Buszman, Pawel ;
Jessurun, Gillian A. J. ;
Koch, Karel T. ;
Troquay, Roland P. T. ;
Hamer, Bas J. B. ;
Ophuis, Ton Oude ;
Woehrle, Jochen ;
Wyderka, Rafal ;
Cayla, Guillaume ;
Hofma, Sjoerd H. ;
Levesque, Sebastien ;
Zurakowski, Aleksander ;
Fischer, Dieter ;
Kosmider, Maciej ;
Goube, Pascal ;
Arkenbout, E. Karin ;
Noutsias, Michel ;
Ferrari, Markus W. ;
Onuma, Yoshinobu ;
Wijns, William ;
Serruys, Patrick W. .
LANCET, 2018, 391 (10119) :431-440
[7]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[8]  
Higgins J.P., 2008, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470712184
[9]   Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 23 (11) :1663-1682
[10]   Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (11) :1539-1558