Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis

被引:22
作者
Sahoo, Nanda Kishore [1 ]
Issar, Yuvraj [2 ]
Thakral, Ankur [3 ]
机构
[1] CMDC, Pune 411001, Maharashtra, India
[2] Armed Forces Med Coll, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[3] MDC, Delhi, India
关键词
Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO); callus stability; corpus; distraction; occlusion; ANKYLOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0000000000005753
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Mandibular hypoplasia is a common dentofacial deformity requiring a combination of orthodontic and surgical treatment. Before the introduction of distraction osteogenesis various orthognathic surgical procedures were carried out to treat mandibular hypoplasia. Orthognathic procedures like corpus lengthening by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and genioplasty are commonly practised all over the world to address the high esthetic demands and functional problems. But hardly there are any established orthognathic surgical procedures to address the deficiency of the posterior part of the mandible that is ramus and condyle.Transverse mandibular deficiency is one of the most difficult problems to be addressed surgically. With the advent of distraction osteogenesis there is a change in concept of addressing mandibular deficiency. Mandibular corpus distraction was first performed by McCarthy et al using an extraoral unidirectional distraction device. The precision of bone lengthening with extraoral distracters did not accurately match the device settings. Since then due to sustained research and design and collaboration with the manufacturers, clinicians have developed various devices to improve the results of mandibular lengthening. Distractor devices of various shape and size are developed for intraoral use in specific anatomical locations of mandible. This presentation will focus on use of intraoral distraction devices on different anatomical locations of mandible. The surgical methods of corpus, ramus, ramuscondylar unit, and symphyseal distraction osteogenesis and associated complications will be discussed in detail.
引用
收藏
页码:E743 / E746
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Transport distraction versus costochondral graft for reconstruction of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: which is better? [J].
Cheung, Lim K. ;
Zheng, Li Wu ;
Ma, Li ;
Shi, Xiao Jian .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2009, 108 (01) :32-40
[2]   Distraction osteogenesis in maxillofacial surgery using internal devices: Review of five cases [J].
Chin, M ;
Toth, BA .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 54 (01) :45-53
[3]   Intraoral distraction for mandibular lengthening: A technical innovation [J].
Diner, PA ;
Kollar, EM ;
Martinez, H ;
Vazquez, MP .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 24 (02) :92-95
[4]  
Howaldt HP, 1998, INT C CRAN FAC BON D
[5]  
ILIZAROV G A, 1969, Eksperimental'naya Khirurgiya i Anesteziologiya, V14, P27
[6]   A Protocol for Management of Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis in Children [J].
Kaban, Leonard B. ;
Bouchard, Carl ;
Troulis, Maria J. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 67 (09) :1966-1978
[7]   LENGTHENING THE HUMAN MANDIBLE BY GRADUAL DISTRACTION [J].
MCCARTHY, JG ;
SCHREIBER, J ;
KARP, N ;
THORNE, CH ;
GRAYSON, BH .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1992, 89 (01) :1-8
[8]  
MOLINA F, 1995, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V96, P825, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199509001-00010
[9]   Comparative Evaluation of Vertical Osteotomy and Sagittal Split Osteotomy for Mandibular Corpus Distraction [J].
Sahoo, N. K. ;
Rangarajan, H. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 69 (02) :381-389
[10]   Selecting Reconstruction Option for TMJ Ankylosis: A Surgeon's Dilemma [J].
Sahoo, Nanda Kishore ;
Tomar, Kapil ;
Kumar, Ashok ;
Roy, Indranil Deb .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 23 (06) :1796-1801