Sparse and Low-Rank Graph for Discriminant Analysis of Hyperspectral Imagery

被引:114
作者
Li, Wei [1 ]
Liu, Jiabin [1 ]
Du, Qian [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2016年 / 54卷 / 07期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Dimensionality reduction; graph embedding; hyperspectral data; low-rank graph; sparse graph; DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; BAND SELECTION; SUBSPACE; REPRESENTATION; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2016.2536685
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Recently, sparse graph-based discriminant analysis (SGDA) has been developed for the dimensionality reduction and classification of hyperspectral imagery. In SGDA, a graph is constructed by l(1)-norm optimization based on available labeled samples. Different from traditional methods (e.g., k-nearest neighbor with Euclidean distance), weights in an l(1)-graph derived via a sparse representation can automatically select more discriminative neighbors in the feature space. However, the sparsity-based graph represents each sample individually, lacking a global constraint on each specific solution. As a consequence, SGDA may be ineffective in capturing the global structures of data. To overcome this drawback, a sparse and low-rank graph-based discriminant analysis (SLGDA) is proposed. Low-rank representation has been proved to be capable of preserving global data structures, although it may result in a dense graph. In SLGDA, a more informative graph is constructed by combining both sparsity and low rankness to maintain global and local structures simultaneously. Experimental results on several different multiple-class hyperspectral-classification tasks demonstrate that the proposed SLGDA significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art SGDA.
引用
收藏
页码:4094 / 4105
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, PROC 26 ANN INT C MA, DOI DOI 10.1145/1553374.1553432.18
[2]   Inductive Robust Principal Component Analysis [J].
Bao, Bing-Kun ;
Liu, Guangcan ;
Xu, Changsheng ;
Yan, Shuicheng .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2012, 21 (08) :3794-3800
[3]   Robust Principal Component Analysis? [J].
Candes, Emmanuel J. ;
Li, Xiaodong ;
Ma, Yi ;
Wright, John .
JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 2011, 58 (03)
[4]  
Cheng B., 2015, IEEE T IMAGE PROCESS, V53, P2241
[5]   Graph-based semisupervised learning [J].
Culp, Mark ;
Michailidis, George .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2008, 30 (01) :174-179
[6]   Classification of Hyperspectral Images by Using Extended Morphological Attribute Profiles and Independent Component Analysis [J].
Dalla Mura, Mauro ;
Villa, Alberto ;
Benediktsson, Jon Atli ;
Chanussot, Jocelyn ;
Bruzzone, Lorenzo .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2011, 8 (03) :542-546
[7]   Similarity-Based Unsupervised Band Selection for Hyperspectral Image Analysis [J].
Du, Qian ;
Yang, He .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2008, 5 (04) :564-568
[8]   Modified Fisher's linear discriminant analysis for hyperspectral imagery [J].
Du, Qian .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2007, 4 (04) :503-507
[9]   Sparse Subspace Clustering: Algorithm, Theory, and Applications [J].
Elhamifar, Ehsan ;
Vidal, Rene .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 35 (11) :2765-2781
[10]   Spectral-Spatial Hyperspectral Image Classification via Multiscale Adaptive Sparse Representation [J].
Fang, Leyuan ;
Li, Shutao ;
Kang, Xudong ;
Benediktsson, Jon Atli .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 52 (12) :7738-7749