Pain education for patients with non-specific low back pain in Nepal: protocol of a feasibility randomised clinical trial (PEN-LBP Trial)

被引:21
作者
Sharma, Saurab [1 ,2 ]
Jensen, Mark P. [3 ]
Moseley, G. Lorimer [4 ]
Abbott, J. Haxby [2 ]
机构
[1] Kathmandu Univ, Sch Med Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Dhulikhel, Bagmati, Nepal
[2] Univ Otago, Dunedin Sch Med, Ctr Musculoskeletal Outcomes Res, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ South Australia, Sch Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2018年 / 8卷 / 08期
关键词
NEUROPHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; INDIVIDUALS; REASSURANCE; THERAPY; QUALITY; CARE; INTERVENTION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022423
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of years lived with disability in Nepal and elsewhere. Management of LBP that is evidence-based, easily accessible, cost-effective and culturally appropriate is desirable. The primary aim of this feasibility study is to determine if it is feasible to conduct a full randomised clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of pain education as an intervention for individuals with LBP in Nepal, relative to guideline-based physiotherapy treatment. The findings of the study will inform the planning of a full clinical trial and if any modifications are required to the protocol before undertaking a full trial. Methods/analysis This protocol describes an assessor-blinded feasibility clinical trial investigating feasibility of the pain education intervention in patients with non-specific LBP in a physiotherapy hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. Forty patients with LBP will be randomly allocated to either pain education or guideline-based physiotherapy treatment (control). Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and at a 1week post-treatment. The primary outcomes are related to feasibility, including: (1) participant willingness to participate in a randomised clinical trial, (2) feasibility of assessor blinding, (3) eligibility and recruitment rates, (4) acceptability of screening procedures and random allocation, (5) possible contamination between the groups, (6) intervention credibility, (7) intervention adherence, (8) treatment satisfaction and (9) difficulty in understanding the interventions being provided. Ethics/dissemination The protocol was approved by Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC; registration number: 422/2017) and University of Otago Human Ethics Committee for Health (registration number: H17/157). The results of the study will be presented at national and international conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number NCT03387228; Pre-results.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [2] Primary care management of non-specific low back pain: key messages from recent clinical guidelines
    Almeida, Matheus
    Saragiotto, Bruno
    Richards, Bethan
    Maher, Chris G.
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2018, 208 (06) : 272 - 275
  • [3] Anderson R T, 1984, Med Anthropol, V8, P46
  • [4] [Anonymous], PAIN REPORTS
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2016, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD012230
  • [6] [Anonymous], NAT PLANN COMM SECR
  • [7] Bajracharya Suraj, 2007, Indian J Orthop, V41, P286, DOI 10.4103/0019-5413.36988
  • [8] Non-specific low back pain
    Balague, Federico
    Mannion, Anne F.
    Pellise, Ferran
    Cedraschi, Christine
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 379 (9814) : 482 - 491
  • [9] Diagnostic triage for low back pain: a practical approach for primary care
    Bardin, Lynn D.
    King, Peter
    Maher, Chris G.
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2017, 206 (06) : 268 - 273
  • [10] GUIDELINES Low back pain and sciatica: summary of NICE guidance
    Bernstein, Ian A.
    Malik, Qudsia
    Carville, Serena
    Ward, Stephen
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356