A New Model Incorporating Axillary Ultrasound After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Predict Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Invasive Breast Cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Zhang, Kai [1 ]
Zhu, Qian [1 ]
Sheng, Danli [1 ]
Li, Jiawei [1 ]
Chang, Cai [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Med Ultrasound, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH | 2020年 / 12卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
breast carcinoma; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; sentinel lymph node; ultrasonography; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; BIOPSY; SURGERY; DISSECTION; DISEASE; TRIAL; IDENTIFICATION; RESECTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2147/CMAR.S239921
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Few models with good discriminative power have been introduced to predict the risk of non-sentinel lymph node (non-SLN) metastasis in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We aimed to develop a new and simple model for predicting the probability of non-SLN metastasis in breast cancer and facilitate the selection of patients who could avoid unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection following NAC. Patients and Methods: A total of 298 patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, who underwent SLN biopsy after completing NAC and subsequently breast surgery, were included and classified into the training set (n=228) and testing set (n=70). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to select factors that could be determined prior to breast surgery and significantly correlated with non-SLN metastasis in the training set. A logistic regression model was developed based on these factors and validated in the testing set. Results: Nodal status before NAC, post-NAC axillary ultrasound status, SLN number, and SLN metastasis number were independent predictors of non-SLN metastases in breast cancer after NAC. A predictive model based on these factors yielded an area under the curve of 0.838 (95% confidence interval: 0.774-0.902, p<0.001) in the training set. When applied to the testing set, this model yielded an area under the curve of 0.808 (95% confidence interval: 0.609-1.000, p=0.003). Conclusion: A new and simple model, which incorporated factors that could be determined prior to breast surgery, was developed to predict non-SLN metastasis in invasive breast cancer following NAC. Although this model performed excellently in internal validation, it requires external validation before it can be widely utilized in the clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:965 / 972
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Predictors of Axillary and Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Involvement
    Postaci, Hakan
    Zengel, Baha
    Yararbas, Ulkem
    Uslu, Adam
    Eliyatkin, Nuket
    Akpinar, Goksever
    Cengiz, Fevzi
    Durusoy, Raika
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 30 (04) : 415 - 421
  • [22] Predictors of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer
    Kim, Yang Hee
    Kim, Min Suk
    Paik, Nam Sun
    Moon, Nan Mo
    Noh, Woo Chul
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2007, 10 (01) : 95 - 100
  • [23] Breast cancer subtypes affect the ultrasound performance for axillary lymph node status evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis
    Fei, Jie
    Wang, Guan Qun
    Meng, Yuan Yuan
    Zhong, Xin
    Ma, Jin Zhu
    Sun, Ning Ning
    Chen, Jing Jing
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 51 (10) : 1509 - 1514
  • [24] Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide for Identifying Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Feasibility Study
    Kurylcio, Andrzej
    Pelc, Zuzanna
    Skorzewska, Magdalena
    Rawicz-Pruszynski, Karol
    Mlak, Radoslaw
    Geca, Katarzyna
    Sedlak, Katarzyna
    Kurylcio, Piotr
    Malecka-Massalska, Teresa
    Polkowski, Wojciech
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (14)
  • [25] A nomogram predictive of non-sentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a sentinel lymph node micrometastasis
    Houvenaeghel, G.
    Nos, C.
    Giard, S.
    Mignotte, H.
    Esterni, B.
    Jacquemier, J.
    Buttarelli, M.
    Classe, J. -M.
    Cohen, M.
    Rouanet, P.
    Llorca, F. Penault
    Bonnier, P.
    Marchal, F.
    Garbay, J. -R.
    Fraisse, J.
    Martel, P.
    Fondrinier, E.
    de Lara, C. Tunon
    Rodier, J. -F.
    EJSO, 2009, 35 (07): : 690 - 695
  • [26] Predicting pathological axillary lymph node status with ultrasound following neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer
    Skarping, Ida
    Fornvik, Daniel
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    Borgquist, Signe
    Ryden, Lisa
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 189 (01) : 131 - 144
  • [27] Can axillary lymphadenectomy be avoided in breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy? Predictors of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis
    Sonia Martinez Alcaide
    Carlos Alberto Fuster Diana
    Julia Camps Herrero
    Laia Bernet Vegue
    Antonio Valdivia Perez
    Eugenio Sahuquillo Arce
    Juan Blas Ballester Sapiña
    Pedro Juan Gonzalez Noguera
    Jose Marcelo Galbis Caravajal
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 306 : 2123 - 2131
  • [28] Predictive Factors of Non-sentinel Lymph Node Involvement in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Micrometastases
    Friedman, Daniele
    Gipponi, Marco
    Murelli, Federica
    Meszaros, Paolo
    Solari, Nicola
    Massa, Michela
    Depaoli, Francesca
    Baccini, Paola
    Carli, Franca
    Gallo, Maurizio
    Cafiero, Ferdinando
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 33 (10) : 4509 - 4514
  • [29] Predictors to assess non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with only one sentinel lymph node metastasis
    Yang Ben
    Yang Li
    Zuo Wen-shu
    Ge Wen-kai
    Zheng Gang
    Zheng Mei-zhu
    Yu Zhi-yong
    Wang Yong-sheng
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (03) : 476 - 481
  • [30] Breast cancer. Against models to predict non-sentinel lymph node status
    Baron, M.
    Teig, B.
    Laberge-Le Couteulx, S.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2010, 38 (10): : 637 - 639