Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 2: the potential effects of inter-fraction and inter-field motions

被引:331
作者
Lomax, A. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Paul Scherrer Inst, Ctr Proton Radiotherapy, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/53/4/015
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Simple tools for studying the effects of inter- fraction and inter- field motions on intensity modulated proton therapy ( IMPT) plans have been developed, and have been applied to both 3D and distal edge tracking ( DET) IMPT plans. For the inter- fraction motion, we have investigated the effects of misaligned density heterogeneities, whereas for the inter- field motion analysis, the effects of field misalignment on the plans have been assessed. Inter- fraction motion problems have been analysed using density differentiated error ( DDE) distributions, which specifically show the additional problems resulting from misaligned density heterogeneities for proton plans. Likewise, for inter- field motion, we present methods for calculating motion differentiated error ( MDE) distributions. DDE and MDE analysis of all plans demonstrate that the 3D approach is generally more robust to both inter- fraction and inter- field motions than the DET approach, but that strong in- field dose gradients can also adversely affect a plan's robustness. An important additional conclusion is that, for certain IMPT plans, even inter- fraction errors cannot necessarily be compensated for by the use of a simple PTV margins, implying that more sophisticated tools need to be developed for uncertainty management and assessment for IMPT treatments at the treatment planning level.
引用
收藏
页码:1043 / 1056
页数:14
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Target volume dose considerations in proton beam treatment planning for lung tumors [J].
Engelsman, M ;
Kooy, HM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (12) :3549-3557
[2]   Influence of setup errors on spinal cord dose and treatment plan quality for cervical spine tumours:: a phantom study for photon IMRT and heavy charged particle radiotherapy [J].
Karger, CP ;
Schulz-Ertner, D ;
Didinger, BH ;
Debus, J ;
Jäkel, O .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (19) :3171-3189
[3]   Intensity modulation methods for proton radiotherapy [J].
Lomax, A .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (01) :185-205
[4]   Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 1: the potential effects of calculational uncertainties [J].
Lomax, A. J. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (04) :1027-1042
[5]  
Lomax Antony J, 2004, Z Med Phys, V14, P147
[6]   Inverse plan optimization accounting for random geometric uncertainties with a multiple instance geometry approximation (MIGA) [J].
McShan, D. L. ;
Kessler, M. L. ;
Vineberg, K. ;
Fraass, B. A. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (05) :1510-1521
[7]   Methodologies and tools for proton beam design for lung tumors [J].
Moyers, MF ;
Miller, DW ;
Bush, DA ;
Slater, JD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (05) :1429-1438
[8]  
Nill Simeon, 2004, Z Med Phys, V14, P35
[9]   Intensity modulated radiotherapy with charged particle beams: Studies of inverse treatment planning for rotation therapy [J].
Oelfke, U ;
Bortfeld, T .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (06) :1246-1257
[10]  
Pedroni Eros, 2004, Z Med Phys, V14, P25