Effectiveness of Screening Modalities in Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

被引:57
|
作者
Zhang, Jianping [1 ]
Cheng, Zhiyuan [2 ,4 ]
Ma, Yubao [1 ]
He, Caili [1 ]
Lu, Yongbin [1 ]
Zhao, Yaxue [1 ]
Chang, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Zhang, Yawei [4 ]
Bai, Yana [1 ]
Cheng, Ning [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Epidemiol & Stat, Sch Publ Hlth, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Basic Med Coll, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Basic Med Coll, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
Colonoscopy; CRC; Incidence; Mortality; FECAL-OCCULT-BLOOD; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; COLONOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; SURVIVAL BENEFIT; MORTALITY; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; COHORT; REDUCTION; DEATH;
D O I
10.1016/j.clcc.2017.03.018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to evaluate on the effectiveness of screening modalities in the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) occurrence and deaths. General meta-analysis was performed to produce pooled estimates of the effect of CRC incidence and mortality using a search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies from January 1992 to March 2016. A network meta-analysis was performed to synthetically compare the effectiveness of 5 frequently used screening modalities. A total of 44 studies with a focus on mortality from CRC using different screening methods were included. General meta-analysis showed that fecal immunohistochemical testing (FIT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), colonoscopy, combination of fecal occult blood testing and FS screening respectively reduced CRC mortality by 59% (relative risk [RR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.59), 33% (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58-0.78), 61% (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31-0.50), 38% (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91) compared with no screening, whereas guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) reduced CRC-related mortality by 14% (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.90). Subgroup analysis showed that summary estimates of reduction in distal CRC mortality and proximal CRC mortality were 26% (95% CI, 62%-89%) and 10% (95% CI, 83%-98%). A network meta-analysis revealed rank probability analysis in which the colonoscopy had a 94.6% probability of being the most effective examination to reduce CRC mortality. In addition, the network meta-analysis estimated odds ratio, which was a 79% reduction (95% CI, 0.09-0.60) in CRC mortality when screening with FIT was compared with annual or biennial gFOBT and colonoscopy was approximately 80% more effective than gFOBT for reducing CRC mortality (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.130.54). Analysis of the effects of different screening methods showed that there was a significant reduction in the incidence of colon cancer, excluding gFOBT. This meta-analysis confirmed that gFOBT, FIT, FS, and colonoscopy were all effective in preventing CRC deaths and a major reduction in distal but not proximal CRC mortality was found. In addition, they were more effective in preventing CRC incidence in addition to gFOBT. The network meta-analysis suggests that colonoscopy is the most effective screening for preventing CRC deaths. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 263
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Molecular markers for colorectal cancer screening
    Dickinson, Brandon T.
    Kisiel, John
    Ahlquist, David A.
    Grady, William M.
    GUT, 2015, 64 (09) : 1485 - 1494
  • [42] Occupational benzene exposure and colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sassano, Michele
    Seyyedsalehi, Monireh Sadat
    Boffetta, Paolo
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 257
  • [43] Comparative Effectiveness of Endovascular Treatment Modalities for De Novo Femoropopliteal Lesions: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhou, Yang
    Zhang, Zhihui
    Lin, Shaomang
    Xiao, Jianbin
    Ai, Wenjia
    Wang, Junwei
    Li, Yangyong
    Li, Qiang
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2020, 27 (01) : 42 - 59
  • [44] The association between organised colorectal cancer screening strategies and reduction of its related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ding, Hanyue
    Lin, Jiaye
    Xu, Zijun
    Wang, Harry H. X.
    Huang, Liwen
    Huang, Junjie
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [45] In the era of widespread endoscopy use, randomized trials may,strongly underestimate the effects of colorectal cancer screening
    Brenner, Hermann
    Stock, Christian
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (10) : 1144 - 1150
  • [46] Time lag to benefit after screening for breast and colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of survival data from the United States, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Denmark
    Lee, Sei J.
    Boscardin, W. John
    Stijacic-Cenzer, Irena
    Conell-Price, Jessamyn
    O'Brien, Sarah
    Walter, Louise C.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
  • [47] Screening for Colorectal Cancer
    Weinberg, David S.
    Schoen, Robert E.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 160 (09)
  • [48] Colorectal cancer screening
    Chan, Pak Wo Webber
    Ngu, Jing Hieng
    Poh, Zhongxian
    Soetikno, Roy
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 58 (01) : 24 - 28
  • [49] Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening - An overview
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Knudsen, Amy B.
    Brenner, Hermann
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 24 (04) : 439 - 449
  • [50] Age at Menarche and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Li, Chun-Yan
    Song, Bo
    Wang, Ying-Yan
    Meng, Hua
    Guo, Shi-Bin
    Liu, Li-Na
    Lv, Hai-Chen
    Wu, Qi-Jun
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (06):