Effectiveness of Screening Modalities in Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

被引:57
|
作者
Zhang, Jianping [1 ]
Cheng, Zhiyuan [2 ,4 ]
Ma, Yubao [1 ]
He, Caili [1 ]
Lu, Yongbin [1 ]
Zhao, Yaxue [1 ]
Chang, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Zhang, Yawei [4 ]
Bai, Yana [1 ]
Cheng, Ning [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Epidemiol & Stat, Sch Publ Hlth, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Basic Med Coll, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Basic Med Coll, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
Colonoscopy; CRC; Incidence; Mortality; FECAL-OCCULT-BLOOD; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; COLONOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; SURVIVAL BENEFIT; MORTALITY; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; COHORT; REDUCTION; DEATH;
D O I
10.1016/j.clcc.2017.03.018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to evaluate on the effectiveness of screening modalities in the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) occurrence and deaths. General meta-analysis was performed to produce pooled estimates of the effect of CRC incidence and mortality using a search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies from January 1992 to March 2016. A network meta-analysis was performed to synthetically compare the effectiveness of 5 frequently used screening modalities. A total of 44 studies with a focus on mortality from CRC using different screening methods were included. General meta-analysis showed that fecal immunohistochemical testing (FIT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), colonoscopy, combination of fecal occult blood testing and FS screening respectively reduced CRC mortality by 59% (relative risk [RR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.59), 33% (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58-0.78), 61% (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31-0.50), 38% (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91) compared with no screening, whereas guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) reduced CRC-related mortality by 14% (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.90). Subgroup analysis showed that summary estimates of reduction in distal CRC mortality and proximal CRC mortality were 26% (95% CI, 62%-89%) and 10% (95% CI, 83%-98%). A network meta-analysis revealed rank probability analysis in which the colonoscopy had a 94.6% probability of being the most effective examination to reduce CRC mortality. In addition, the network meta-analysis estimated odds ratio, which was a 79% reduction (95% CI, 0.09-0.60) in CRC mortality when screening with FIT was compared with annual or biennial gFOBT and colonoscopy was approximately 80% more effective than gFOBT for reducing CRC mortality (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.130.54). Analysis of the effects of different screening methods showed that there was a significant reduction in the incidence of colon cancer, excluding gFOBT. This meta-analysis confirmed that gFOBT, FIT, FS, and colonoscopy were all effective in preventing CRC deaths and a major reduction in distal but not proximal CRC mortality was found. In addition, they were more effective in preventing CRC incidence in addition to gFOBT. The network meta-analysis suggests that colonoscopy is the most effective screening for preventing CRC deaths. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 263
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk-stratified screening and colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: A retrospective study from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial
    Zhang, Yu
    Sheng, Chao
    Fan, Zeyu
    Liu, Ya
    Liu, Xiaomin
    Duan, Hongyuan
    Dai, Hongji
    Lyu, Zhangyan
    Yang, Lei
    Song, Fangfang
    Song, Fengju
    Huang, Yubei
    Chen, Kexin
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 187
  • [32] Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening vs Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Colorectal Cancer
    Juul, Frederik E.
    Cross, Amanda J.
    Schoen, Robert E.
    Senore, Carlo
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    Miller, Eric A.
    Segnan, Nereo
    Wooldrage, Kate
    Wieszczy-Szczepanik, Paulina
    Armaroli, Paola
    Garborg, Kjetil K.
    Adami, Hans-Olov
    Hoff, Geir
    Kalager, Mette
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Holme, Oyvind
    Loberg, Magnus
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (02) : E240007
  • [33] Cost-effectiveness of a multitarget stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening of Medicare beneficiaries
    Naber, Steffie K.
    Knudsen, Amy B.
    Zauber, Ann G.
    Rutter, Carolyn M.
    Fischer, Sara E.
    Pabiniak, Chester J.
    Soto, Brittany
    Kuntz, Karen M.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (09):
  • [34] Comparison of the detection of colorectal lesions in different endoscopic modalities: A network meta-analysis and systematic review
    Li, Lifu
    Ou, Yinghua
    Yue, Hui
    Sun, Hong
    Chen, Peisheng
    Liu, Suying
    He, Fengjian
    Peng, Qianqian
    Deng, Sanhua
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2019, 18 (01) : 154 - 162
  • [35] Fecal Occult Blood Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Traditional and New-generation Fecal Immunochemical Tests
    Meklin, Jannica
    Syrjanen, Kari
    Eskelinen, Matti
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 40 (07) : 3591 - 3604
  • [36] Effectiveness of a Controlled Trial to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening in Vietnamese Americans
    Nguyen, Bang H.
    McPhee, Stephen J.
    Stewart, Susan L.
    Doan, Hiep T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 100 (05) : 870 - 876
  • [37] Cost-Effectiveness of Patient Mailings to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Sequist, Thomas D.
    Franz, Calvin
    Ayanian, John Z.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2010, 48 (06) : 553 - 557
  • [38] Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening on All-Cause and CRC-Specific Mortality Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zheng, Senshuang
    Schrijvers, Jelle J. A.
    Greuter, Marcel J. W.
    Kats-Ugurlu, Guersah
    Lu, Wenli
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [39] Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of a urine metabolomics test vs. alternative colorectal cancer screening strategies
    Barichello, Scott
    Deng, Lu
    Ismond, Kathleen P.
    Loomes, Dustin E.
    Kirwin, Erin M.
    Wang, Haili
    Chang, David
    Svenson, Lawrence W.
    Nguyen Xuan Thanh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 34 (11) : 1953 - 1962
  • [40] Disinfection by-products in drinking water and colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Rahman, Md. Bayzidur
    Driscoll, Tim
    Cowie, Christine
    Armstrong, Bruce K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 39 (03) : 733 - 745