Effectiveness of Screening Modalities in Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

被引:57
|
作者
Zhang, Jianping [1 ]
Cheng, Zhiyuan [2 ,4 ]
Ma, Yubao [1 ]
He, Caili [1 ]
Lu, Yongbin [1 ]
Zhao, Yaxue [1 ]
Chang, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Zhang, Yawei [4 ]
Bai, Yana [1 ]
Cheng, Ning [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Epidemiol & Stat, Sch Publ Hlth, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Basic Med Coll, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Basic Med Coll, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
Colonoscopy; CRC; Incidence; Mortality; FECAL-OCCULT-BLOOD; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; COLONOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; SURVIVAL BENEFIT; MORTALITY; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; COHORT; REDUCTION; DEATH;
D O I
10.1016/j.clcc.2017.03.018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to evaluate on the effectiveness of screening modalities in the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) occurrence and deaths. General meta-analysis was performed to produce pooled estimates of the effect of CRC incidence and mortality using a search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies from January 1992 to March 2016. A network meta-analysis was performed to synthetically compare the effectiveness of 5 frequently used screening modalities. A total of 44 studies with a focus on mortality from CRC using different screening methods were included. General meta-analysis showed that fecal immunohistochemical testing (FIT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), colonoscopy, combination of fecal occult blood testing and FS screening respectively reduced CRC mortality by 59% (relative risk [RR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.59), 33% (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58-0.78), 61% (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31-0.50), 38% (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91) compared with no screening, whereas guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) reduced CRC-related mortality by 14% (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.90). Subgroup analysis showed that summary estimates of reduction in distal CRC mortality and proximal CRC mortality were 26% (95% CI, 62%-89%) and 10% (95% CI, 83%-98%). A network meta-analysis revealed rank probability analysis in which the colonoscopy had a 94.6% probability of being the most effective examination to reduce CRC mortality. In addition, the network meta-analysis estimated odds ratio, which was a 79% reduction (95% CI, 0.09-0.60) in CRC mortality when screening with FIT was compared with annual or biennial gFOBT and colonoscopy was approximately 80% more effective than gFOBT for reducing CRC mortality (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.130.54). Analysis of the effects of different screening methods showed that there was a significant reduction in the incidence of colon cancer, excluding gFOBT. This meta-analysis confirmed that gFOBT, FIT, FS, and colonoscopy were all effective in preventing CRC deaths and a major reduction in distal but not proximal CRC mortality was found. In addition, they were more effective in preventing CRC incidence in addition to gFOBT. The network meta-analysis suggests that colonoscopy is the most effective screening for preventing CRC deaths. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 263
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost effectiveness analysis of three colorectal cancer screening modalities in Kuwait
    Nur, Amrizal Muhammad
    Aljunid, Syed Mohamed
    Tolma, Eleni L.
    Annaka, Mahmoud
    Alwotayan, Rihab
    Elbasmi, Amani
    Alali, Walid Q.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [2] Systematic review with meta-analysis: the comparative effectiveness of aspirin vs. screening for colorectal cancer prevention
    Emilsson, L.
    Holme, O.
    Bretthauer, M.
    Cook, N. R.
    Buring, J. E.
    Loberg, M.
    Adami, H. -O.
    Sesso, H. D.
    Gaziano, M. J.
    Kalager, M.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 45 (02) : 193 - 204
  • [3] Comparative Effectiveness of Fecal Immunochemical Tests versus Flexible Sigmoidoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Mutneja, Hemant Raj
    Agrawal, Rohit
    Bhurwal, Abhishek
    Arora, Shilpa
    Go, Andrew
    Attar, Bashar M.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER DISEASES, 2021, 30 (02) : 267 - 273
  • [4] Effectiveness of sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
    Han, Chunyang
    Wu, Fan
    Xu, Jian
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [5] Effects of sigmoidoscopy screening (including colonoscopy) on colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Dongying
    Xu, Qian
    Dai, Senjie
    Zhang, Yueming
    Ding, Fulin
    Ji, Linling
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2024, 39
  • [6] Colorectal cancer screening with faecal testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Jodal, Henriette C.
    Helsingen, Lise M.
    Anderson, Joseph C.
    Lytvyn, Lyubov
    Vandvik, Per Olav
    Emilsson, Louise
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (10):
  • [7] Time to benefit for colorectal cancer screening: survival meta-analysis of flexible sigmoidoscopy trials
    Tang, Victoria
    Boscardin, W. John
    Stijacic-Cenzer, Irena
    Lee, Sei J.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [8] Reduced incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer with flexible-sigmoidoscopy screening: A meta-analysis
    Shroff, Jennifer
    Thosani, Nirav
    Batra, Sachin
    Singh, Harminder
    Guha, Sushovan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (48) : 18466 - 18476
  • [9] Is flexible sigmoidoscopy screening associated with reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality? a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Wang, Xinmiao
    Cao, Luchang
    Song, Xiaotong
    Zhu, Guanghui
    Ni, Baoyi
    Ma, Xinyi
    Li, Jie
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [10] Colorectal Cancer Screening: Stool DNA and Other Noninvasive Modalities
    Bailey, James R.
    Aggarwal, Ashish
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    GUT AND LIVER, 2016, 10 (02) : 204 - 211