The investigation of shale gas wastewater treatment by electro-Fenton process: Statistical optimization of operational parameters

被引:36
作者
Turan, Nouha Bakaraki [1 ]
Erkan, Hanife Sari [1 ]
Engin, Guleda Onkal [1 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Fac Civil Engn, TR-34220 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Shale gas wastewater; Electro-Fenton process; Response surface methodology; Optimum operating parameters; ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESSES; MARCELLUS SHALE; MANAGEMENT; DEGRADATION; CHALLENGES; REMOVAL; DRIVERS; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2017.04.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Shale gas is an alternative natural source of energy resulting from the anaerobic degradation of organics within shale formations. However, shale gas exploration is accompanied by shale gas wastewater production constituting a new source of pollution threatening the environment. Electro-Fenton process (EF) is used for the first time in this study as a new method for shale gas wastewater treatment where the optimum operating parameters of the the responses including COD, color, total phenol removal efficiencies and waste sludge volume were determined using a response surface methodology (RSM). Based on the analysis of variance (ANOVA), the coefficient of determination (R-2) was calculated and found to be above 0.94 for all the responses. The maximum removal efficiencies were found to be around 87.35%, 89.15%, and 91.75% for COD, color, and total phenol removal under the optimum conditions, respectively. The operational cost of the EF process applied to shale gas wastewater for COD removal at optimum conditions was determined to be 4.13 (sic)/m(3). The results indicated that the electro-Fenton seems to be an efficient treatment method for shale gas wastewater. (C) 2017 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 213
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[11]  
Bozdogan N., 1994, TURK 10 PETR K SERG, P125
[12]   Electro-Fenton Process and Related Electrochemical Technologies Based on Fenton's Reaction Chemistry [J].
Brillas, Enric ;
Sires, Ignasi ;
Oturan, Mehmet A. .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2009, 109 (12) :6570-6631
[13]   Hydroxyl radicals based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for remediation of soils contaminated with organic compounds: A review [J].
Cheng, Min ;
Zeng, Guangming ;
Huang, Danlian ;
Lai, Cui ;
Xu, Piao ;
Zhang, Chen ;
Liu, Yang .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2016, 284 :582-598
[14]   Natural Gas Operations from a Public Health Perspective [J].
Colborn, Theo ;
Kwiatkowski, Carol ;
Schultz, Kim ;
Bachran, Mary .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2011, 17 (05) :1039-1056
[15]   Geochemical evolution of produced waters from hydraulic fracturing of the Marcellus Shale, northern Appalachian Basin: A multivariate compositional data analysis approach [J].
Engle, Mark A. ;
Rowan, Elisabeth L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2014, 126 :45-56
[16]   A review of the issues and treatment options for wastewater from shale gas extraction by hydraulic fracturing [J].
Estrada, Jose M. ;
Bhamidimarri, Rao .
FUEL, 2016, 182 :292-303
[17]   Stable isotope geochemistry of coal bed and shale gas and related production waters: A review [J].
Golding, Suzanne D. ;
Boreham, Chris J. ;
Esterle, Joan S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2013, 120 :24-40
[18]   Water Management Challenges Associated with the Production of Shale Gas by Hydraulic Fracturing [J].
Gregory, Kelvin B. ;
Vidic, Radisav D. ;
Dzombak, David A. .
ELEMENTS, 2011, 7 (03) :181-186
[19]   Iodide, Bromide, and Ammonium in Hydraulic Fracturing and Oil and Gas Wastewaters: Environmental Implications [J].
Harkness, Jennifer S. ;
Dwyer, Gary S. ;
Warner, Nathaniel R. ;
Parker, Kimberly M. ;
Mitch, William A. ;
Vengosh, Avner .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (03) :1955-1963
[20]  
Hayes T., 2009, Marcellus Shale Initiative Publications Database, V10