The Influence of Service Orientation on B2B e-Service Capabilities: An Empirical Investigation

被引:27
作者
Oliveira, Pedro [1 ]
Roth, Aleda V. [2 ]
机构
[1] CATOLICA LISBON Sch Business & Econ, P-1649023 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Clemson Univ, Coll Business & Behav Sci, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
关键词
service operations strategy; B2B electronic-services; B2B capabilities; service orientation; e-service delivery; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; E-COMMERCE; PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS; OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; TECHNOLOGY READINESS; USER ACCEPTANCE; PERCEIVED EASE; MEDIA RICHNESS; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01256.x
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
E-Services, or the company's portfolio of service offerings available to its customers through the Internet, are an emerging area of interest to operations management. Yet little is known about the operations and capabilities needed for provision of business-to-business (B2B) e-services. This paper aims to make a contribution toward closing this gap. First, we develop a new construct of B2B e-service capability, a term that captures a generic set of five interrelated and complementary dimensions: (1) e-service recovery, (2) e-customization, (3) ease of navigation, (4) service portfolio comprehensiveness, and (5) information richness. These combined operational abilities are associated with B2B service delivery, including its portal design, technology architecture, and mix of product and service offerings. They are posited to be necessary for delivering effective B2B e-services. We also argue that, both service orientation (SO) and customer receptivity to technology, influence B2B e-service capability. We empirically test a path model using structural equation modeling on a sample of 181 businesses that have deployed B2B e-services. We find that the influence of SO on performance is not direct but rather mediated by the e-service capability, a finding that holds for both goods producers and service providers. We suggest that a firm's SO may mitigate industrial customers' resistance toward conducting business online.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 443
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   A Benchmark for B2B Use of E-Commerce [J].
Fosdick, Scott ;
Reber, Bryan H. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNET COMMERCE, 2005, 4 (01) :123-134
[32]   Unethical use of information access and analytics in B2B service organisations: The dark side of behavioural loyalty [J].
Behera, Rajat Kumar ;
Bala, Pradip Kumar .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 109 :14-31
[33]   Relational orientation in B2B strategies: Measurement scale development and validation [J].
Zakrzewska-Bielawska, Agnieszka ;
Czakon, Wojciech ;
Kraus, Sascha .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 160
[34]   Adopting organizational virtualization in B2B firms: An empirical study in Singapore [J].
Liu, Chunhui ;
Sia, Choon-Ling ;
Wei, Kwok-Kee .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 45 (07) :429-437
[35]   Risk-Aware Pricing of B2B Services: Approach, Realization and Application to a Payments Transaction Processing Service [J].
Fischbach, Michael ;
Alt, Rainer .
BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS (BIS 2016), 2016, 255 :341-355
[36]   B2B E-Marketing Strategies of Multinational Corporations: Empirical Evidence from the United States and Australia [J].
Singh, Tanuja ;
Gordon, Geoffrey ;
Purchase, Sharon .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2007, 22 (01) :31-44
[37]   On the critical success factors for B2B e-marketplace [J].
Li, Jijian ;
Li, Liwei .
Seventh International Conference on Electronic Commerce, Vols 1 and 2, Selected Proceedings, 2005, :119-122
[38]   Facilitating Adoption of B2B e-Commerce Platforms [J].
Berezina, Anastasiia ;
Buzulukova, Ekaterina ;
Tretyak, Olga .
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND GLOBAL SOCIETY, DTGS 2021, 2022, 1503 :522-535
[39]   E-services in business to business (B2B) context [J].
Yang, Y ;
Humphreys, P ;
McIvor, R ;
Yang, B .
THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ENGINEERING: DIGITAL ENTERPRISES AND NONTRADITIONAL INDUSTRIALIZATION, 2003, :660-665
[40]   Research and Implementation of B2B E-commerce System [J].
Qi Ligen .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, MANAGEMENT, COMPUTER AND SOCIETY, 2016, 37 :1773-1775