Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center

被引:27
作者
Albadine, Roula [1 ]
Hyndman, Matthew E. [2 ]
Chaux, Alcides [1 ]
Jeong, J. Y. [1 ]
Saab, Shahrazad [1 ]
Tavora, Fabio [1 ]
Epstein, Jonathan I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gonzalgo, Mark L. [2 ]
Pavlovich, Christian P. [2 ]
Netto, George J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Pathol, Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; Surgical margin; Biochemical recurrence; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic prostatectomy; Laparoscopic prostatectomy; ORGAN-CONFINED DISEASE; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; CAPSULAR INCISION; LEARNING-CURVE; LOCATION; SPECIMENS; LENGTH; IMPACT; AREAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.humpath.2011.04.029
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Studies detailing differences in positive surgical margin among open retropubic radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy are lacking. A retrospective review of all prostatectomies with positive surgical margin performed at our center in 2007 disclosed 99 cases, 6 (5%) of which were reinterpreted cases as having negative margins. Ninety-three cases were, therefore, included, corresponding to 37 retropubic radical prostatectomies, 19 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies, and 37 robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. The relationship of positive surgical margin characteristics to clinicopathologic parameters and biochemical recurrence was assessed. The most commonly found positive surgical margin site was the apex/distal third in all groups (62% retropubic prostatectomies, 79% laparoscopic prostatectomies, 60% robotic-assisted prostatectomies). Total linear length of positive surgical margin sites was significantly correlated with preoperative prostate-specific antigen, preoperative prostate-specific antigen density, pT stage, and tumor volume (P <= .001). We found no significant differences among the 3 groups with respect to total linear length, number of foci, laterality, or location of positive surgical margin. The rate of biochemical recurrence was also comparable in the 3 groups. On univariate analyses, biochemical recurrence was significantly associated with preoperative prostate-specific antigen values, preoperative prostate-specific antigen density, Gleason score, number of positive surgical margins, and total linear length of positive surgical margin (P <= .02). Only preoperative prostate-specific antigen density and number of positive surgical margin foci were statistically significant (P <= .03) independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. We found no significant difference in positive surgical margin characteristics or biochemical recurrence among the 3 radical prostatectomy modalities. Preoperative prostate-specific antigen density and number of positive surgical margin foci were the only independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 260
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Robotic radical prostatectomy: A technique to reduce pT2 positive margins [J].
Ahlering, TE ;
Eichel, L ;
Edwards, RA ;
Lee, DI ;
Skarecky, DW .
UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (06) :1224-1228
[2]   Prognostic significance of a positive surgical margin in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer [J].
Ahyai, Sascha A. ;
Zacharias, Mario ;
Isbarn, Hendrik ;
Steuber, Thomas ;
Eichelberg, Christian ;
Koellermann, Jens ;
Fisch, Margit ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. ;
Huland, Hartwig ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Chun, Felix K. -H. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (04) :478-483
[3]   Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes [J].
Atug, F ;
Castle, EP ;
Srivastav, SK ;
Burgess, SV ;
Thomas, R ;
Davis, R .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (05) :866-872
[4]   Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Versus Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Short-Term Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival [J].
Barocas, Daniel A. ;
Salem, Shady ;
Kordan, Yakup ;
Herrell, S. Duke ;
Chang, Sam S. ;
Clark, Peter E. ;
Davis, Rodney ;
Baumgartner, Roxelyn ;
Phillips, Sharon ;
Cookson, Michael S. ;
Smith, Joseph A., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (03) :990-996
[5]   Robotic prostatectomy: A review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches [J].
Berryhill, Roy, Jr. ;
Jhaveri, Jay ;
Yadav, Rajiv ;
Leung, Robert ;
Rao, Sandhya ;
El-Hakim, Assaad ;
Tewari, Ashutosh .
UROLOGY, 2008, 72 (01) :15-23
[6]   Tumor Grade at Margins of Resection in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Is an Independent Predictor of Prognosis [J].
Brimo, Fadi ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (05) :1206-1209
[7]   A streamlined three-dimensional volume estimation method accurately classifies prostate tumors by volume [J].
Chen, ME ;
Johnston, D ;
Reyes, AO ;
Soto, CP ;
Babaian, RJ ;
Troncoso, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2003, 27 (10) :1291-1301
[8]   Positive surgical margins in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ-confined disease at radical prostatectomy: Histologic features and pitfalls [J].
Chuang, Ai-Ying ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2008, 32 (08) :1201-1206
[9]   The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy [J].
Chuang, Ai-Ying ;
Nielsen, Matthew E. ;
Hernandez, David J. ;
Walsh, Patrick C. ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (04) :1306-1310
[10]  
Descazeaud A, 2007, PROG UROL, V17, P203