The economic value of tropical forests in meeting global climate stabilization goals

被引:10
作者
Fuss, Sabine [1 ,2 ]
Golub, Alexander [3 ]
Lubowski, Ruben [4 ]
机构
[1] Mercator Res Inst Global Commons & Climate Change, Berlin, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Geog Dept, Berlin, Germany
[3] Amer Univ, Washington, DC 20016 USA
[4] Environm Def Fund, New York, NY USA
来源
GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY | 2020年 / 4卷
关键词
adaptation and mitigation; economics; ecosystem services; modeling and simulation; natural resources (biological and non-biological); INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; DEFORESTATION; EMISSIONS; UNCERTAINTY; OPTIONS; POLICY; COST; RISK;
D O I
10.1017/sus.2020.34
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Non-technical summary Conserving tropical forests has many benefits, from protecting biodiversity, sustaining indigenous and local communities, and safeguarding climate. To achieve the ambitious climate goals of the Paris Agreement, forest protection is essential. Yet deforestation continues to diminish the world's forests. Halting this trend is the objective of the international framework for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+). While previous studies have demonstrated the contribution of tropical forests to mitigate climate change, here we show that tropical forest protection can 'flatten the curve' of the costs of transition to climate stability, estimating tens of trillions of dollars in policy cost savings. Technical summary The pledges made by parties under the Paris Agreement are insufficient to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees C relative to pre-industrial levels. We use a global climate-economic model to quantify the economic benefits from rapidly deploying programs for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and increased reforestation (REDD+) given current delays in the implementation of climate policies around the world. REDD+ has been shown to have substantial greenhouse gas emissions mitigation potential in the fight against climate change and can thus play a critical role in closing the emissions gap, thereby enabling the achievement of more ambitious climate targets. Under our principal scenario, we estimate that REDD+ can contribute up to US$36 trillion in net policy cost savings by mitigating the adjustment costs of reaching a greenhouse gas emissions trajectory consistent with ambitious global climate stabilization goals. Investment in REDD+ has a high benefit-cost ratio; one dollar invested in REDD+ yields about US$5.4 in net policy cost savings. Realizing the full estimated potential for REDD+ reduces the risk-adjusted carbon price in 2030 by US$45/tCO(2). Social media summary Protecting tropical forests is crucial to achieve ambitious climate stabilization goals while saving trillions of dollars in economic value.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Economics of climate change under uncertainty: Benefits of flexibility [J].
Anda, Jon ;
Golub, Alexander ;
Strukova, Elena .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (04) :1345-1355
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The climate casino: Risk, uncertainty, and economics for a warming world
[4]   Potential for low-cost carbon dioxide removal through tropical reforestation [J].
Busch, Jonah ;
Engelmann, Jens ;
Cook-Patton, Susan C. ;
Griscom, Bronson W. ;
Kroeger, Timm ;
Possingham, Hugh ;
Shyamsundar, Priya .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2019, 9 (06) :463-+
[5]   Market-based methods for monetizing uncertainty reduction [J].
Cooke R. ;
Golub A. .
Environment Systems and Decisions, 2020, 40 (1) :3-13
[6]  
de Coninck H., 2018, Global warming of 1.5 C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts t o eradicate pove rt y
[7]  
Dietz S, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P676, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2972, 10.1038/nclimate2972]
[8]  
Edenhofer O, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
[9]   The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century [J].
Fricko, Oliver ;
Havlik, Petr ;
Rogelj, Joeri ;
Klimont, Zbigniew ;
Gusti, Mykola ;
Johnson, Nils ;
Kolp, Peter ;
Strubegger, Manfred ;
Valin, Hugo ;
Amann, Markus ;
Ermolieva, Tatiana ;
Forsell, Nicklas ;
Herrero, Mario ;
Heyes, Chris ;
Kindermann, Georg ;
Krey, Volker ;
McCollum, David L. ;
Obersteiner, Michael ;
Pachauri, Shonali ;
Rao, Shilpa ;
Schmid, Erwin ;
Schoepp, Wolfgang ;
Riahi, Keywan .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 42 :251-267
[10]   Modeling Uncertainty in Integrated Assessment of Climate Change: A Multimodel Comparison [J].
Gillingham, Kenneth ;
Nordhaus, William ;
Anthoff, David ;
Blanford, Geoffrey ;
Bosetti, Valentina ;
Christensen, Peter ;
McJeon, Haewon ;
Reilly, John .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2018, 5 (04) :791-826