Yield Responses to Planting Density for US Modern Corn Hybrids: A Synthesis-Analysis

被引:169
作者
Assefa, Yared [1 ]
Prasad, P. V. Vara [1 ]
Carter, Paul [2 ]
Hinds, Mark [2 ]
Bhalla, Gaurav [2 ]
Schon, Ryan [2 ]
Jeschke, Mark [2 ]
Paszkiewicz, Steve [2 ]
Ciampitti, Ignacio A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agron, Throckmorton Plant Sci Ctr 2004, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] DuPont Pioneer, 7100 NW 62nd Ave, Johnston, IA 50131 USA
关键词
KERNEL NUMBER DETERMINATION; MAIZE HYBRIDS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MATURITY; NITROGEN FERTILITY; WIDE-RANGE; POPULATION; CROP; STRESS; TIME; EFFICIENCIES;
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2016.04.0215
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Identifying an optimal plant density is a critical management decision for corn (Zea mays L.) production. The main objectives of this study were to: (i) investigate the grain yield responses to plant density (yield-density relationship), (ii) identify best fitted yield-density response curves, and (iii) explore genotype (G) x environment (E) interaction effect on yield-density response models. Analysis was conducted on meta-data (124,374 observations) gathered from 22 US states and 2 Canadian provinces, diverse sites (E), for years from 2000-2014 on multiple hybrids (G). Yield data were further grouped into four yield environments (low [LY], <7 Mg ha(-1); medium [MY], 7-10 Mg ha(-1); high [HY], 10-13 Mg ha(-1); and very high [VHY], > 13 Mg ha(-1) yielding groups). Primary outcomes from this analysis were: (1) strong G x E interaction; (2) a quadratic model best fitted yield-density relationship; (3) four contrasting yield-density responses identified as dominant in each yield productivity environment, i.e., a declining, a constant, an increasing, and ever-increasing type; (4) the yield productivity environment varied for the different corn comparative relative maturity (CRM) groups, i.e., the LY environment for long-maturing hybrids matched with a MY or HY environment for short maturing hybrids; and (5) maximum yielding plant density (MYPD) was lower but maximum yield was greater for long-versus short-maturing hybrids. In summary, optimal plant density should be decided based on detailed G x E analysis of production conditions that include factors such as CRM, yield productivity environment (weather-soil x management practices), and site information.
引用
收藏
页码:2802 / 2817
页数:16
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Abbas H. K., 2012, American Journal of Plant Sciences, V3, P1341
[2]   Kernel number determination in maize [J].
Andrade, FH ;
Vega, C ;
Uhart, S ;
Cirilo, A ;
Cantarero, M ;
Valentinuz, O .
CROP SCIENCE, 1999, 39 (02) :453-459
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[4]  
Assefa Y., 2014, Corn and grain sorghum comparison: All things considered, P57, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-800112-7.00005-4
[5]   Dryland and Irrigated Corn Yield with Climate, Management, and Hybrid Changes from 1939 through 2009 [J].
Assefa, Yared ;
Roozeboom, Kraig L. ;
Staggenborg, Scott A. ;
Du, Juan .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2012, 104 (02) :473-482
[6]  
Averbeke W., 1992, S AFRICAN J PLANT SO, V9, P186
[7]  
BLEASDALE JKA, 1960, NATURE, V188, P342, DOI 10.1038/186022b0
[8]   Optimal plant population and nitrogen fertility for dryland corn in western Nebraska [J].
Blumenthal, JM ;
Lyon, DJ ;
Stroup, WW .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2003, 95 (04) :878-883
[9]   Control of kernel weight and kernel water relations by post-flowering source-sink ratio in maize [J].
Borrás, L ;
Westgate, ME ;
Otegui, ME .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2003, 91 (07) :857-867