Toddlers' language-mediated visual search: They need not have the words for it

被引:33
作者
Johnson, Elizabeth K. [1 ]
McQueen, James M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Huettig, Falk [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[2] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Behav Sci, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 加拿大创新基金会;
关键词
Colour; Lexical processing; Visual attention; Visual search; Language development; Toddler word recognition; Conceptual development; COLOR KNOWLEDGE; ATTENTION; CHILDREN; LOOKING; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1080/17470218.2011.594165
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Eye movements made by listeners during language-mediated visual search reveal a strong link between visual processing and conceptual processing. For example, upon hearing the word for a missing referent with a characteristic colour (e. g., "strawberry"), listeners tend to fixate a colour-matched distractor (e. g., a red plane) more than a colour-mismatched distractor (e. g., a yellow plane). We ask whether these shifts in visual attention are mediated by the retrieval of lexically stored colour labels. Do children who do not yet possess verbal labels for the colour attribute that spoken and viewed objects have in common exhibit language-mediated eye movements like those made by older children and adults? That is, do toddlers look at a red plane when hearing "strawberry"? We observed that 24-month-olds lacking colour term knowledge nonetheless recognized the perceptual-conceptual commonality between named and seen objects. This indicates that language-mediated visual search need not depend on stored labels for concepts.
引用
收藏
页码:1672 / 1682
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The effect of map label language on the visual search of cartographic point symbols [J].
Cybulski, Pawel ;
Krassanakis, Vassilios .
CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2022, 49 (03) :189-204
[42]   Have a Clue! The Effect of Visual Cues on Children's Search Behavior in the Classroom [J].
Landoni, Monica ;
Aliannejadi, Mohammad ;
Huibers, Theo ;
Murgia, Emiliana ;
Pera, Maria Soledad .
CHIIR'22: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 CONFERENCE ON HUMAN INFORMATION INTERACTION AND RETRIEVAL, 2022, :310-314
[43]   Target templates in low target-distractor discriminability visual search have higher resolution, but the advantage they provide is short-lived [J].
Lau, Jonas Sin-Heng ;
Pashler, Hal ;
Brady, Timothy F. .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2021, 83 (04) :1435-1454
[44]   Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback [J].
Cox, Patrick H. ;
Kravitz, Dwight J. ;
Mitroff, Stephen R. .
COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS, 2021, 6 (01)
[45]   Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback [J].
Patrick H. Cox ;
Dwight J. Kravitz ;
Stephen R. Mitroff .
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6
[46]   Flexible fast-mapping: Deaf children dynamically allocate visual attention to learn novel words in American Sign Language [J].
Lieberman, Amy M. ;
Fitch, Allison ;
Borovsky, Arielle .
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 25 (03)
[48]   Visual paired-associate learning: In search of material-specific effects in adult patients who have undergone temporal lobectomy [J].
Smith, Mary Lou ;
Bigel, Marla ;
Miller, Laurie A. .
EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2011, 20 (02) :326-330
[49]   Target templates in low target-distractor discriminability visual search have higher resolution, but the advantage they provide is short-lived [J].
Jonas Sin-Heng Lau ;
Hal Pashler ;
Timothy F. Brady .
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2021, 83 :1435-1454
[50]   Response processing during visual search in normal aging: The need for more time to prevent cross talk between spatial attention and manual response selection [J].
Amenedo, Elena ;
Lorenzo-Lopez, Laura ;
Pazo-Alvarez, Paula .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 91 (02) :201-211