The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: theory versus practice

被引:139
作者
Heeneman, Sylvia [1 ,2 ]
Pool, Andrea Oudkerk [1 ,3 ]
Schuwirth, Lambert W. T. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. [2 ,3 ]
Driessen, Erik W. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Pathol, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Sch Hlth Profess Educ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Educ Dev & Res, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Med, Hlth Profess Educ, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL-EDUCATION; FEEDBACK; CHALLENGES; FOUNDATION; WORKPLACE; COLLEGE; LESSONS; FOCUS; POWER;
D O I
10.1111/medu.12645
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
ContextIt is widely acknowledged that assessment can affect student learning. In recent years, attention has been called to programmatic assessment', which is intended to optimise both learning functions and decision functions at the programme level of assessment, rather than according to individual methods of assessment. Although the concept is attractive, little research into its intended effects on students and their learning has been conducted. ObjectivesThis study investigated the elements of programmatic assessment that students perceived as supporting or inhibiting learning, and the factors that influenced the active construction of their learning. MethodsThe study was conducted in a graduate-entry medical school that implemented programmatic assessment. Thus, all assessment information, feedback and reflective activities were combined into a comprehensive, holistic programme of assessment. We used a qualitative approach and interviewed students (n=17) in the pre-clinical phase of the programme about their perceptions of programmatic assessment and learning approaches. Data were scrutinised using theory-based thematic analysis. ResultsElements from the comprehensive programme of assessment, such as feedback, portfolios, assessments and assignments, were found to have both supporting and inhibiting effects on learning. These supporting and inhibiting elements influenced students' construction of learning. Findings showed that: (i) students perceived formative assessment as summative; (ii) programmatic assessment was an important trigger for learning, and (iii) the portfolio's reflective activities were appreciated for their generation of knowledge, the lessons drawn from feedback, and the opportunities for follow-up. Some students, however, were less appreciative of reflective activities. For these students, the elements perceived as inhibiting seemed to dominate the learning response. ConclusionsThe active participation of learners in their own learning is possible when learning is supported by programmatic assessment. Certain features of the comprehensive programme of assessment were found to influence student learning, and this influence can either support or inhibit students' learning responses. Discuss ideas arising from the article at discuss.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 498
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]   Research paradigms in medical education research [J].
Bunniss, Suzanne ;
Kelly, Diane R. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 44 (04) :358-366
[12]   Modelling the pre-assessment learning effects of assessment: evidence in the validity chain [J].
Cilliers, Francois J. ;
Schuwirth, Lambert W. T. ;
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 46 (11) :1087-1098
[13]   A model of the pre-assessment learning effects of summative assessment in medical education [J].
Cilliers, Francois J. ;
Schuwirth, Lambert W. T. ;
Herman, Nicoline ;
Adendorff, Hanelie J. ;
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2012, 17 (01) :39-53
[14]   The portfolio approach to competency-based assessment at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine [J].
Dannefer, Elaine F. ;
Henson, Lindsey C. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2007, 82 (05) :493-502
[15]   A qualitative study on trainees' and supervisors' perceptions of assessment for learning in postgraduate medical education [J].
Dijksterhuis, Marja G. K. ;
Schuwirth, Lambert W. T. ;
Braat, Didi D. M. ;
Teunissen, Pim W. ;
Scheele, Fedde .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2013, 35 (08) :E1396-E1402
[16]   A new framework for designing programmes of assessment [J].
Dijkstra, J. ;
Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. ;
Schuwirth, L. W. T. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2010, 15 (03) :379-393
[17]  
Dochy F., 2007, Rethinking assessment in higher education: learning for the longer term, P87
[18]   Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research [J].
Dolmans, DHJM ;
De Grave, W ;
Wolfhagen, IHAP ;
van der Vleuten, CPM .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 39 (07) :732-741
[19]   What is wrong with assessment in postgraduate training? Lessons from clinical practice and educational research [J].
Driessen, Erik ;
Scheele, Fedde .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2013, 35 (07) :569-574
[20]   The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: A Maastricht case report [J].
Driessen, Erik W. ;
van Tartwijk, Jan ;
Govaerts, Marjan ;
Teunissen, Pim ;
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 (03) :226-231