The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: theory versus practice

被引:139
作者
Heeneman, Sylvia [1 ,2 ]
Pool, Andrea Oudkerk [1 ,3 ]
Schuwirth, Lambert W. T. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. [2 ,3 ]
Driessen, Erik W. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Pathol, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Sch Hlth Profess Educ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Educ Dev & Res, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Med, Hlth Profess Educ, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL-EDUCATION; FEEDBACK; CHALLENGES; FOUNDATION; WORKPLACE; COLLEGE; LESSONS; FOCUS; POWER;
D O I
10.1111/medu.12645
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
ContextIt is widely acknowledged that assessment can affect student learning. In recent years, attention has been called to programmatic assessment', which is intended to optimise both learning functions and decision functions at the programme level of assessment, rather than according to individual methods of assessment. Although the concept is attractive, little research into its intended effects on students and their learning has been conducted. ObjectivesThis study investigated the elements of programmatic assessment that students perceived as supporting or inhibiting learning, and the factors that influenced the active construction of their learning. MethodsThe study was conducted in a graduate-entry medical school that implemented programmatic assessment. Thus, all assessment information, feedback and reflective activities were combined into a comprehensive, holistic programme of assessment. We used a qualitative approach and interviewed students (n=17) in the pre-clinical phase of the programme about their perceptions of programmatic assessment and learning approaches. Data were scrutinised using theory-based thematic analysis. ResultsElements from the comprehensive programme of assessment, such as feedback, portfolios, assessments and assignments, were found to have both supporting and inhibiting effects on learning. These supporting and inhibiting elements influenced students' construction of learning. Findings showed that: (i) students perceived formative assessment as summative; (ii) programmatic assessment was an important trigger for learning, and (iii) the portfolio's reflective activities were appreciated for their generation of knowledge, the lessons drawn from feedback, and the opportunities for follow-up. Some students, however, were less appreciative of reflective activities. For these students, the elements perceived as inhibiting seemed to dominate the learning response. ConclusionsThe active participation of learners in their own learning is possible when learning is supported by programmatic assessment. Certain features of the comprehensive programme of assessment were found to influence student learning, and this influence can either support or inhibit students' learning responses. Discuss ideas arising from the article at discuss.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 498
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Workplace-based assessment and students' approaches to learning: a qualitative inquiry [J].
Al-Kadri, Hanan M. ;
Al-Kadi, Mohammed T. ;
Van Der Vleuten, Cees P. M. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2013, 35 :S31-S38
[2]   Exploring assessment factors contributing to students' study strategies: Literature review [J].
Al-Kadri, Hanan M. ;
Al-Moamary, Mohamed S. ;
Roberts, Chris ;
Van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 :S42-S50
[3]   State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback [J].
Archer, Julian C. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 44 (01) :101-108
[4]   Formative assessment: a critical review [J].
Bennett, Randy .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2011, 18 (01) :5-25
[5]   Assessment preferences and their relationship to learning strategies and orientations [J].
Birenbaum, M .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1997, 33 (01) :71-84
[6]   Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions [J].
Bjork, Robert A. ;
Dunlosky, John ;
Kornell, Nate .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 64, 2013, 64 :417-+
[7]   Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: when theory meets practice [J].
Bok, Harold G. J. ;
Teunissen, Pim W. ;
Favier, Robert P. ;
Rietbroek, Nancy J. ;
Theyse, Lars F. H. ;
Brommer, Harold ;
Haarhuis, Jan C. M. ;
van Beukelen, Peter ;
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. ;
Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C. .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 13
[8]   Clarifying students' feedback-seeking behaviour in clinical clerkships [J].
Bok, Harold G. J. ;
Teunissen, Pim W. ;
Spruijt, Annemarie ;
Fokkema, Joanne P. I. ;
van Beukelen, Peter ;
Jaarsma, Debbie A. D. C. ;
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 47 (03) :282-291
[9]   Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note [J].
Bowen, Glenn A. .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2008, 8 (01) :137-152
[10]   The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11 [J].
Buckley, Sharon ;
Coleman, Jamie ;
Davison, Ian ;
Khan, Khalid S. ;
Zamora, Javier ;
Malick, Sadia ;
Morley, David ;
Pollard, David ;
Ashcroft, Tamasine ;
Popovic, Celia ;
Sayers, Jayne .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2009, 31 (04) :340-355