Research on Innovation Capability of Regional Innovation System Based on Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Evidence from China

被引:4
作者
Huang, Zhenyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Maritime Univ, Sch Publ Adm & Humanities, Dalian 116026, Peoples R China
关键词
regional innovation system; innovation capability; SRE framework; matching effect; fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; USERS;
D O I
10.3390/systems10060220
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Building regional innovation systems (RISs) has become an important measure for China to implement an innovation-driven development strategy, but a moderately complex way to describe the characteristics of the RISs is needed for aiding the implementation of this strategy. Based on the subject-resource-environment (SRE) framework with five secondary conditions, this study takes 31 regions in China as cases, and studies the innovation capability of the RISs by using the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) approach. The findings are as follows: (1) Different combinations of the five conditions have generated two high and one low innovation capability configurations of RISs. (2) The two configurations of high innovation capability are the independent-investment type and the independent-open type. (3) The configuration of low innovation capability is the core-resource-deficiency type. This study has simplified the complexity of the RISs to a certain extent and revealed that the matching effect among core conditions is the key to obtaining high innovation capability. The conclusions provide practical implications for the RISs in China to acquire appropriate innovation capabilities according to their resource endowment conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters [J].
Asheim, BT ;
Coenen, L .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (08) :1173-1190
[2]   Modelling Efficiency in Regional Innovation Systems: A Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Problem with Shared Outputs within Groups of Decision-Making Units [J].
Aviles-Sacoto, Sonia Valeria ;
Cook, Wade D. ;
Guemes-Castorena, David ;
Zhu, Joe .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 287 (02) :572-582
[3]  
Bai J.H., 2015, Econ. Res. J, V50, P174
[4]   The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models [J].
Carayannis, Elias G. ;
Grigoroudis, Evangelos ;
Campbell, David F. J. ;
Meissner, Dirk ;
Stamati, Dimitra .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2018, 48 (01) :148-162
[5]  
China Science and Technology Development Strategy Research Group, 2019, EV REP CHIN REG INN
[6]  
DOLOREUX D., 2002, TECHNOL SOC, V24, P243, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00007-6
[7]  
Du YZ., 2017, Journal of Management World, V06, P155
[8]   How can clusters sustain performance? The role of network strength, network openness, and environmental uncertainty [J].
Eisingerich, Andreas B. ;
Bell, Simon J. ;
Tracey, Paul .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (02) :239-253
[9]   Regional innovation systems: what can we learn from 25 years of scientific achievements? [J].
Fernandes, Cristina ;
Farinha, Luis ;
Ferreira, Joao J. ;
Asheim, Bjorn ;
Rutten, Roel .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2021, 55 (03) :377-389
[10]   A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations [J].
Fiss, Peer C. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (04) :1180-1198