Hourly simulations of the microwave brightness temperature of seasonal snow in Quebec, Canada, using a coupled snow evolution-emission model

被引:39
作者
Brucker, L. [1 ]
Royer, A. [2 ]
Picard, G. [1 ]
Langlois, A. [2 ]
Fily, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble 1, CNRS, Lab Glaciol & Geophys Environm, F-38041 Grenoble, France
[2] Univ Sherbrooke, Ctr Applicat & Rech Teledetect, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Snow; Surface-based radiometer; Microwave brightness temperature; Crocus snow model; MEMLS radiative transfer model; WATER EQUIVALENT; PASSIVE MICROWAVE; IN-SITU; CLPX; 2003; DEPTH; COVER; PARAMETERS; SCATTERING; REMOTE; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2011.03.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To interpret the snowpack evolution, and in particular to estimate snow water equivalent (SWE), passive microwave remote sensing has proved to be a useful tool given its sensitivity to snow properties. However, the main uncertainties using existing SWE algorithms arise from snow metamorphism which evolves during the winter season, and changes the snow emissivity. To consider the evolution in snow emissivity a coupled snow evolution-emission model can be used to simulate the brightness temperature (T-B) of the snowpack. During a dedicated campaign in the winter season. from November to April, of 2007-2008 two surface-based radiometers operating at 19 GHz and 37 GHz continuously measured the passive microwave radiation emitted through a seasonal snowpack in southern Quebec (Canada). This paper aims at modeling and interpreting this time series of T-B over the whole season, with an hourly step, using a coupled multi-layer snow evolution-emission model. The thermodynamic snow evolution model, referred as to Crocus, was driven by local meteorological measurements. Results from this model provided, in turn, the input variables to run the Microwave Emission Model of Layered Snowpacks (MEMLS) in order to predict T-B at 19 GHz and 37 GHz for both vertical (V) and horizontal (H) polarizations. The accuracy of T-B predicted by the Crocus-MEMLS coupled model was evaluated using continuous measurements from the surface-based radiometers. The weather conditions observed during the winter season were diverse, including several warm periods with melting snow and rain-on-snow events, producing very complex variations in the time series of T-B. To aid our analysis, we identified days with melting snow versus days with dry snow. The Crocus-MEMLS coupled model was able to accurately predict melt events with a success rate of 86%. The residual error was due to an overestimation of the duration of several melt events simulated by Crocus. This problem was explained by 1) a limitation of percolation, and 2) a very long-acting melt of lower layers due to geothermal flux. When the snowpack was completely dry, the global trend of T-B during the season was characterized by a decrease of T-B due to growth in the snow grain size. During most of the season, Crocus-MEMLS correctly predicted the evolution of T-B resulting from temperature gradient metamorphism; the root mean square errors ranged between 2.8 K for the 19 GHz vertical polarization (19V) and 6.9 K for the 37 GHz horizontal polarization (37H). However, during dry periods near the end of the season, the values of T-B were strongly overestimated. This overestimation was mainly due to a limitation of the growth of large snow grains in the wet snowpack simulated by Crocus. This effect was confirmed by estimating snow grain sizes from the observed T-B and the coupled model. The estimated snow grain sizes were larger and more realistic than those initially predicted by the Crocus model. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1966 / 1977
页数:12
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Characterization of errors in a coupled snow hydrology-microwave emission model [J].
Andreadis, Konstantinos M. ;
Liang, Ding ;
Tsang, Leung ;
Lettenmaier, Dennis P. ;
Josberger, Edward G. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2008, 9 (01) :149-164
[2]   Surface Based Radiometer (SBR) data acquisition system [J].
Asmus, KW ;
Grant, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 20 (15-16) :3125-3129
[3]   A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning Part I: numerical model [J].
Bartelt, P ;
Lehning, M .
COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 35 (03) :123-145
[4]  
Bernier M, 1999, HYDROL PROCESS, V13, P3041, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19991230)13:18<3041::AID-HYP14>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-E
[6]   A coupled model to simulate snow behavior on roads [J].
Bouilloud, L ;
Martin, E .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2006, 45 (03) :500-516
[7]   Spatial and temporal variability of Canadian monthly snow depths, 1946-1995 [J].
Brown, RD ;
Braaten, RO .
ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, 1998, 36 (01) :37-54
[8]   AN ENERGY AND MASS MODEL OF SNOW COVER SUITABLE FOR OPERATIONAL AVALANCHE FORECASTING [J].
BRUN, E ;
MARTIN, E ;
SIMON, V ;
GENDRE, C ;
COLEOU, C .
JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY, 1989, 35 (121) :333-342
[9]   A NUMERICAL-MODEL TO SIMULATE SNOW-COVER STRATIGRAPHY FOR OPERATIONAL AVALANCHE FORECASTING [J].
BRUN, E ;
DAVID, P ;
SUDUL, M ;
BRUNOT, G .
JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY, 1992, 38 (128) :13-22
[10]   Study of the snow melt-freeze cycle using multi-sensor data and snow modelling [J].
Cagnati, A ;
Crepaz, A ;
Macelloni, G ;
Pampaloni, P ;
Ranzi, R ;
Tedesco, M ;
Tomirotti, M ;
Valt, M .
JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY, 2004, 50 (170) :419-426