Variation in working memory capacity and cognitive control: Goal maintenance and microadjustments of control

被引:85
作者
Unsworth, Nash [1 ]
Redick, Thomas S. [2 ]
Spillers, Gregory J. [1 ]
Brewer, Gene A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Dept Psychol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Psychol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AR USA
关键词
Cognitive control; Working memory capacity; Individual differences; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; CONFLICT ADAPTATION; TIME DISTRIBUTIONS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PROCESSING-SPEED; TASK SET; ATTENTION; STROOP; ANTISACCADE;
D O I
10.1080/17470218.2011.597865
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Variation in working memory capacity (WMC) and cognitive control was examined in four experiments. In the experiments high- and low-WMC individuals performed a choice reaction time task (Experiment 1), a version of the antisaccade task (Experiment 2), a version of the Stroop task (Experiment 3), and an arrow version of the flanker task (Experiment 4). An examination of response time distributions suggested that high-and low-WMC individuals primarily differed in the slowest responses in each experiment, consistent with the notion that WMC is related to active maintenance abilities. Examination of two indicators of microadjustments of control (posterror slowing and conflict adaptation effects) suggested no differences between high-and low-WMC individuals. Collectively these results suggest that variation in WMC is related to some, but not all, cognitive control operations. The results are interpreted within the executive attention theory of WMC.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 355
页数:30
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, INTELLIGENCE INSTRUC
[2]  
Blais C., Q J EXPT PS IN PRESS
[3]   PSYCHOMETRIC INTELLIGENCE AND VISUAL FOCUSED ATTENTION - RELATIONSHIPS IN NONSEARCH TASKS [J].
BLANCO, MJ ;
ALVAREZ, AA .
INTELLIGENCE, 1994, 18 (01) :77-106
[4]   Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation [J].
Bleckley, MK ;
Durso, FT ;
Crutchfield, JM ;
Engle, RW ;
Khanna, MM .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2003, 10 (04) :884-889
[5]   Conflict monitoring and cognitive control [J].
Botvinick, MM ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) :624-652
[6]   HOW NORMAL AND RETARDED INDIVIDUALS MONITOR AND REGULATE SPEED AND ACCURACY OF RESPONDING IN SERIAL CHOICE TASKS [J].
BREWER, N ;
SMITH, GA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1984, 113 (01) :71-93
[7]   DEVELOPMENTAL-CHANGES IN PROCESSING SPEED - INFLUENCE OF SPEED ACCURACY REGULATION [J].
BREWER, N ;
SMITH, GA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1989, 118 (03) :298-310
[8]   Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data [J].
Carter, Cameron S. ;
van Veen, Vincent .
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 7 (04) :367-379
[9]  
Cohen J. D., 2004, COGNITIVE NEUROSCIEN, P71
[10]   Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: who's in control? [J].
Cohen, JD ;
Botvinick, M ;
Carter, CS .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (05) :421-423