Alumina-supported In2O3, Ga2O3 and B2O3 catalysts for lean NOx reduction with dimethyl ether

被引:8
|
作者
Erkfeldt, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Petersson, Martin [3 ]
Palmqvist, Anders [2 ]
机构
[1] Volvo Technol Corp, SE-41288 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Chalmers, Competence Ctr Catalysis, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Volvo Powertrain Corp, Dept 91514, BC2, SE-40508 Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Hydrocarbon-SCR; NOx reduction; Alumina; Alternative fuel; Dimethyl ether; Indium; Gallium; Boron; PREPARED GA2O3-AL2O3 CATALYSTS; GALLIUM OXIDE CATALYSTS; ENGINE EXHAUST-GAS; SELECTIVE REDUCTION; GAMMA-ALUMINA; NITRIC-OXIDE; MECHANISTIC ASPECTS; NITROGEN MONOXIDE; EXCESS OXYGEN; DME;
D O I
10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.01.031
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Alumina-supported In2O3, Ga2O3 and B2O3 were investigated as catalysts for lean NOx reduction with DME as reducing agent and compared to pure Al2O3 and In2O3. The In2O3-promoted alumina catalysts showed the highest NOx conversion at low temperatures, although with a narrow temperature window. Pure In2O3, on the other hand, was inactive for NOx reduction with DME. The Ga2O3- and B2O3-promoted alumina catalysts gave the highest NOx conversion at higher temperatures, showed a temperature window similar to pure alumina, but were less sensitive to H2O inhibition. Possible reasons for these observations are discussed. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 383
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In2O3/Al2O3 catalysts for NOx reduction in lean condition
    Park, PW
    Ragle, CS
    Boyer, CL
    Balmer, ML
    Engelhard, M
    McCready, D
    JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS, 2002, 210 (01) : 97 - 105
  • [2] Fluidized-Bed Isobutane Dehydrogenation over Alumina-Supported Ga2O3 and Ga2O3-Cr2O3 Catalysts
    Matveyeva, Anna N.
    Zaitseva, Nadezhda A.
    Maki-Arvela, Paivi
    Aho, Atte
    Bachina, Anastasia K.
    Fedorov, Sergey P.
    Murzin, Dmitry Yu.
    Pakhomov, Nikolai A.
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2018, 57 (03) : 927 - 938
  • [3] Experimental electronic structure of In2O3 and Ga2O3
    Janowitz, Christoph
    Scherer, Valentina
    Mohamed, Mansour
    Krapf, Alica
    Dwelk, Helmut
    Manzke, Recardo
    Galazka, Zbigniew
    Uecker, Reinhard
    Irmscher, Klaus
    Fornari, Roberto
    Michling, Marcel
    Schmeisser, Dieter
    Weber, Justin R.
    Varley, Joel B.
    Van de Walle, Chris G.
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2011, 13
  • [4] SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF GA2O3 AND IN2O3 NANOWIRES
    Stafiniak, Andrzej
    Prazmowska, Joanna
    Korbutowicz, Ryszard
    Serafinczuk, Jaroslaw
    Paszkiewicz, Regina
    ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2019, 17 (02) : 229 - 233
  • [5] SYSTEMATICS OF EVAPORATION COEFFICIENT AL2O3 GA2O3 IN2O3
    BURNS, RP
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1966, 44 (09): : 3307 - +
  • [6] An ultraviolet photodetector based on In2O3/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction
    Zhang, Yongfeng
    Liu, Xinyan
    Bi, Zhengyu
    Xu, Ruiliang
    Chen, Yu
    Zhou, Jingran
    Ruan, Shengping
    MATERIALS SCIENCE IN SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSING, 2024, 181
  • [7] Differences Between Al2O3 and Ag/Al2O3 for Lean Reduction of NOx with Dimethyl Ether
    Stefanie Tamm
    Hanna H. Ingelsten
    Magnus Skoglundh
    Anders E. C. Palmqvist
    Topics in Catalysis, 2009, 52
  • [8] Differences Between Al2O3 and Ag/Al2O3 for Lean Reduction of NOx with Dimethyl Ether
    Tamm, Stefanie
    Ingelsten, Hanna H.
    Skoglundh, Magnus
    Palmqvist, Anders E. C.
    TOPICS IN CATALYSIS, 2009, 52 (13-20) : 1813 - 1816
  • [9] Metal oxide catalysts for DME steam reforming: Ga2O3 and Ga2O3–Al2O3 catalysts
    Thomas Mathew
    Yusuke Yamada
    Atsushi Ueda
    Hiroshi Shioyama
    Tetsuhiko Kobayashi
    Catalysis Letters, 2005, 100 : 247 - 253
  • [10] Impregnated and Co-precipitated Pd–Ga2O3, Pd–In2O3 and Pd–Ga2O3–In2O3 Catalysts: Influence of the Microstructure on the CO2 Selectivity in Methanol Steam Reforming
    Christoph Rameshan
    Harald Lorenz
    Marc Armbrüster
    Igor Kasatkin
    Bernhard Klötzer
    Thomas Götsch
    Kevin Ploner
    Simon Penner
    Catalysis Letters, 2018, 148 : 3062 - 3071