Focal uptake of 68Ga-DOTATOC in the pancreas: pathological or physiological correlate in patients with neuroendocrine tumours?

被引:43
作者
Al-Ibraheem, Akram [1 ,2 ]
Bundschuh, Ralph Alexander [1 ]
Notni, Johannes [1 ]
Buck, Andreas [1 ,3 ]
Winter, Anna [1 ]
Wester, Hans-Juergen [1 ]
Schwaiger, Markus [1 ]
Scheidhauer, Klemens [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Nukl Med Klin & Poliklin, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Amman, Jordan
[3] Univ Klinikum Wurzburg, Nukl Med Klin & Poliklin, Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
Ga-68-DOTATOC; Neuroendocrine tumour; Head of pancreas; Liver; SUV; PET; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-011-1875-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Neuroendocrine tumours are frequently located in the upper abdomen and especially in the pancreas. Imaging of the abdomen with somatostatin analogs such as Ga-68-DOTA-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide (DOTATOC) is a standard approach for imaging neuroendocrine cancer, but is still challenging due to physiological and technical considerations in this area. Therefore, the aim of this study was to further investigate the origin of Ga-68-DOTATOC findings in the pancreas. Methods Forty-three consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumours were examined by Ga-68-DOTATOC positron emission tomography (PET)/CT for staging or restaging. As imaging of the upper abdomen is frequently affected by breathing artefacts, PET and CT data were analysed for misalignment and rearranged if necessary. Any noticeable uptake in the pancreas was described. Tracer uptake in the head of the pancreas and the liver was measured by means of maximum and average standard uptake value (SUVmax, SUVav). The reference standards (malignant versus benign) for correlation with PET findings were clinical and radiological follow-up (mean follow-up time 14 months) (n = 37) or histological confirmation (n = 6). Results In 23 of 43 studies (54%) misalignment between PET and CT data was found with a mean value of 1.4 cm. Visual assessment demonstrated that 20 of 43 scans (46.6%) showed no uptake in the head of the pancreas. Of 43 scans, 23 (53.4%) showed noticeable uptake with focal pattern in the head of the pancreas in 10 scans and irregular pattern in 13 scans. Follow-up indicated malignant pancreatic lesions in three patients. The pancreatic head to liver SUVav ratios in these patients ranged from 1.62 to 6.85, whereas in cases of uptake without known malignancy ratios ranged from 0.56 to 1.19. Considering SUVmax, the ratio ranged from 3.24 to 9.1 and from 0.84 to 1.47, respectively. No statistically significant difference was noted between uptake in the head of the pancreas and the liver in patients without malignant pancreatic tumours (p > 0.05). Conclusion Ga-68-DOTATOC uptake in the head of the pancreas is a common finding in patients undergoing Ga-68-DOTATOC PET/CT. However, this finding most likely represents a physiological condition, especially if the uptake in the pancreatic head is similar to the uptake in the liver (uptake ratio head to liver SUVav < 1.4). Therefore, quantification is recommended to avoid false-positive diagnosis. Misalignment due to respiratory motion must always be taken into account.
引用
收藏
页码:2005 / 2013
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and somatostatin receptor (sst1-sst5) expression in normal human tissue: correlation of sst2 mRNA and SUVmax [J].
Boy, Christian ;
Heusner, Till A. ;
Poeppel, Thorsten D. ;
Redmann-Bischofs, Anja ;
Unger, Nicole ;
Jentzen, Walter ;
Brandau, Wolfgang ;
Mann, Klaus ;
Antoch, Gerald ;
Bockisch, Andreas ;
Petersenn, Stephan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 38 (07) :1224-1236
[2]   Abdominal organ motion measured using 4D CT [J].
Brandner, Edward D. ;
Wu, Andrew ;
Chen, Hungcheng ;
Heron, Dwight ;
Kalnicki, Shalom ;
Komanduri, Krishna ;
Gerszten, Kristina ;
Burton, Steve ;
Ahmed, Irfan ;
Shou, Zhenyu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 65 (02) :554-560
[3]   Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET and 111In-DTPAOC (Octreoscan) SPECT in patients with neuroendocrine tumours [J].
Buchmann, I. ;
Henze, M. ;
Engelbrecht, S. ;
Eisenhut, M. ;
Runz, A. ;
Schaefer, M. ;
Schilling, T. ;
Haufe, S. ;
Herrmann, T. ;
Haberkorn, U. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 (10) :1617-1626
[4]  
Bundschuh RA, 2008, NUKLEARMED-NUCL MED, V47, pN14
[5]   68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET in neuroendocrine tumors:: Comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and CT [J].
Gabriel, Michael ;
Decristoforo, Clemens ;
Kendler, Dorota ;
Dobrozemsky, Georg ;
Heute, Dirk ;
Uprimny, Christian ;
Kovacs, Peter ;
Von Guggenberg, Elisabeth ;
Bale, Reto ;
Virgolini, Irene J. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2007, 48 (04) :508-518
[6]  
Goerres GW, 2002, J NUCL MED, V43, P1469
[7]   Intraindividual comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-TATE and 18F-DOPA PET in patients with well-differentiated metastatic neuroendocrine tumours [J].
Haug, Alexander ;
Auernhammer, Christoph J. ;
Waengler, Bjoern ;
Tiling, Reinhold ;
Schmidt, Gerwin ;
Goeke, Burkhard ;
Bartenstein, Peter ;
Poepperl, Gabriele .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2009, 36 (05) :765-770
[8]   Monitoring Response to Therapeutic Interventions in Patients With Cancer [J].
Herrmann, Ken ;
Krause, Bernd Joachim ;
Bundschuh, Ralph A. ;
Dechow, Tobias ;
Schwaiger, Markus .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 39 (03) :210-232
[9]   Biokinetics and imaging with the somatostatin receptor PET radioligand 68Ga-DOTATOC:: preliminary data [J].
Hofmann, M ;
Maecke, H ;
Börner, AR ;
Weckesser, E ;
Schöffski, P ;
Oei, ML ;
Schumacher, J ;
Henze, M ;
Heppeler, A ;
Meyer, GJ ;
Knapp, WH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 28 (12) :1751-1757
[10]   Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-DOTATOC and [18F]FDG in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours scheduled for 90Y-DOTATOC therapy [J].
Koukouraki, Sophia ;
Strauss, Ludwig G. ;
Georgoulias, Vassilios ;
Eisenhut, Michael ;
Haberkorn, Uwe ;
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2006, 33 (10) :1115-1122