A Pareto supplier selection algorithm for minimum the life cycle cost of complex product system

被引:53
作者
Du, Baigang [1 ]
Guo, Shunsheng [1 ]
Huang, Xiaorong [2 ]
Li, Yibing [1 ]
Guo, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ Technol, Sch Mech & Elect Engn, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Polytech Univ, Sch Management & Econ, Huangshi 435003, Peoples R China
关键词
Supplier selection; Complex product system; Pareto optimal; Hybrid genetic algorithm; Life cycle cost; MULTIOBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; PROGRAMMING APPROACH; INTEGRATED APPROACH; ORDER ALLOCATION; CHAIN DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION; MODEL; MAINTENANCE; MANAGEMENT; CRITERION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.056
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Supplier selection has significant impact on life cycle cost of complex product system (CoPS). In this paper, a new variant of supplier selection problem named life cycle supplier selection of CoPS (LSS&CoPS) problem is addressed. There are three kinds of choices for a manufacturer to complete a CoPS: self-made, purchasing the finished component and outsourcing. Different selection not only results in difference of procurement cost of CoPS, but also results in reliability changing after it delivered to customer which greatly influences the operating cost in CoPS's lifecycle. However, the minimizing of two objectives is mutually conflicted. This paper presents a bi-objective LSS&CoPS model which considering operating stage of CoPS to balance the procurement cost and operating cost. Moreover, a hybridization of Pareto genetic algorithm (PGA) with multi-intersection and similarity crossover (MSC) strategy is proposed to solve the bi-objective problem. Also, a dual-chromosome is used to represent the variable-length chromosome. Finally, a cement equipment supplier optimal in a cement equipment enterprise is provided. Example indicates that the procurement cost and operating cost have been optimized, yields a Pareto optimal solution of supplier schema for project managers to make-decision and decrease the life cycle cost of CoPS. Additionally, the results show that the proposed approach is more preferably in Pareto optimal solution searching. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4253 / 4264
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Green supply chains with carbon trading and environmental sourcing: Formulation and life cycle assessment [J].
Abdallah, Tarek ;
Farhat, Ali ;
Diabat, Ali ;
Kennedy, Scott .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2012, 36 (09) :4271-4285
[2]   An integrated approach for supplier portfolio selection: Lean or agile? [J].
Abdollahi, Mohammad ;
Arvan, Meysam ;
Razmi, Jafar .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (01) :679-690
[3]   A fuzzy multi-objective programming model for supplier selection with volume discount and risk criteria [J].
Aghai, Shima ;
Mollaverdi, Naser ;
Sabbagh, Mohammad Saeed .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 71 (5-8) :1483-1492
[4]   Supplier selection and performance evaluation in just-in-time production environments [J].
Aksoy, Asli ;
Ozturk, Nursel .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (05) :6351-6359
[5]  
De Boer L., 2001, EUROPEAN J PURCHASIN, V7, P75, DOI [10.1016/s0969-7012(00)00028-9, DOI 10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00028-9]
[6]   Applying modified NSGA-II for bi-objective supply chain problem [J].
Bandyopadhyay, Susmita ;
Bhattacharya, Ranjan .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2013, 24 (04) :707-716
[7]   A multiobjective chance constrained programming model for supplier selection under uncertainty [J].
Bilsel, R. Ufuk ;
Ravindran, A. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2011, 45 (08) :1284-1300
[8]  
Chai J., 2014, INT J PRODUCTION EC
[9]   Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature [J].
Chai, Junyi ;
Liu, James N. K. ;
Ngai, Eric W. T. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (10) :3872-3885
[10]   A modified Pareto genetic algorithm for multi-objective build-to-order supply chain planning with product assembly [J].
Che, Z. H. ;
Chiang, C. J. .
ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2010, 41 (7-8) :1011-1022