The attitudes of 1066 patients with cancer towards participation in randomised clinical trials

被引:62
作者
Jenkins, V. [1 ]
Farewell, D. [2 ]
Batt, L. [3 ]
Maughan, T. [3 ]
Branston, L. [3 ]
Langridge, C. [1 ]
Parlour, L. [1 ]
Farewell, V. [4 ]
Fallowfield, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Canc Res Psychosocial Oncol Grp, Brighton & Sussex Med Sch, Sussex, England
[2] Cardiff Univ, Sch Med, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[3] NISCHR CRC Wales Canc Res Network Cardiff, Cardiff, Wales
[4] Univ Forvie Site, MRC Biostat Unit, Inst Publ Hlth, Cambridge, England
关键词
patients' attitudes; RCTs; INFORMED-CONSENT; PALLIATIVE CARE; THERAPY; VIEWS; COMMUNICATION; INTERVENTION; PERSPECTIVES; RECRUITMENT; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6606004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Barriers to randomised clinical trial (RCT) recruitment include failure to identify eligible patients, reluctance of staff to approach them and attitudes of some health-care professionals and patients. As part of a larger UK prospective study examining the communication and involvement in RCTs of 22 multidisciplinary teams in Wales, we also assessed the attitudes of patients they treat towards trials. METHODS: Out of 1146 patients attending outpatient departments who were approached, 1146 (93%) completed the seven-item Attitudes to Randomised Trials Questionnaire (ARTQ), probing their general attitudes towards medical research and likely participation in a hypothetical two-arm RCT. RESULTS: Randomisation initially deterred many patients from endorsing a willingness to participate. However, if information about the trial logic, voluntary nature and rights to withdraw were provided, together with further treatment details, 83% (886 out of 1066) would potentially participate. Other variables associated with a positive inclination towards participation included previous trial experience (P < 0.01), male gender (P < 0.01) and younger age, with patients >= 70 years less likely to consider trial entry (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients were receptive to RCT participation. Many of those initially disinclined because of randomisation would consider joining if given further details that form part of standard GCP consent guidelines. These data show the importance and need for clear communication and information to encourage RCT participation. Evidence-based training courses are available to assist with this. British Journal of Cancer (2010) 103, 1801-1807. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6606004 www.bjcancer.com Published online 30 November 2010 (C) 2010 Cancer Research UK
引用
收藏
页码:1801 / 1807
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Knowledge and understanding among cancer patients consenting to participate in clinical trials [J].
Bergenmar, Mia ;
Molin, Clementine ;
Wilking, Nils ;
Brandberg, Yvonne .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 44 (17) :2627-2633
[2]   A survey of breast cancer patients' views on entry into several clinical studies [J].
Burnet, K ;
Benson, J ;
Earl, H ;
Thornton, H ;
Cox, K ;
Purushotham, AD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2004, 13 (01) :32-35
[3]   Clinicians' attitudes to clinical trials of cancer therapy [J].
Fallowfield, L ;
Ratcliffe, D ;
Souhami, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 (13) :2221-2229
[4]   Attitudes of patients to randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy [J].
Fallowfield, LJ ;
Jenkins, V ;
Brennan, C ;
Sawtell, M ;
Moynihan, C ;
Souhami, RL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (10) :1554-1559
[5]   Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial [J].
Featherstone, K ;
Donovan, JL .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7167) :1177-1180
[6]   Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it? - The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial [J].
Featherstone, K ;
Donovan, JL .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2002, 55 (05) :709-719
[7]   Results of an intervention study to improve communication about randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy [J].
Fleissig, A ;
Jenkins, V ;
Fallowfield, L .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 37 (03) :322-331
[8]   Gender differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological perspectives [J].
Gustafson, PE .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1998, 18 (06) :805-811
[9]   Aversion to Ambiguity Regarding Medical Tests and Treatments: Measurement, Prevalence, and Relationship to Sociodemographic Factors [J].
Han, Paul K. J. ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Moser, Richard P. ;
Klein, William M. P. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2009, 14 (06) :556-572
[10]   Information and communication in the context of a clinical trial [J].
Hietanen, P ;
Aro, AR ;
Holli, K ;
Absetz, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 (16) :2096-2104