Urban Form and Housing Density, Australian Cities and European Models: Copenhagen and Stockholm Reconsidered

被引:10
作者
Bamford, Greg [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Architecture, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
Brisbane; compact city; Copenhagen; Finger Plan; Garden City; housing density; open space; Social City; Stockholm; urban density; urban form;
D O I
10.1080/08111140903108572
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Stockholm and Copenhagen have been widely regarded in English-speaking countries as exemplifying aspects of the compact city-from well planned, mixed use, higher density, transit-oriented development to sociable urban spaces. So how is it that the development of these two cities has also been located in the garden city tradition? This article tackles this question in the context of the implications European cities are often thought to have for low-density Australian cities. Comparisons of the urban form of Stockholm and Brisbane and of higher density housing in Copenhagen and Brisbane emphasise that the 'Scandinavian model' is as much about the role of open space in shaping urban form and in housing design as our current preoccupation with density.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 356
页数:20
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
198
[2]  
r T., 2006, HOUS THEORY SOC, V23, P109, DOI DOI 10.1080/14036090600773139
[3]  
*AMCORD, 1995, NAT RES DOC RES DE 2
[4]  
[Anonymous], TOWN PLANNING PRACTI
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, BRISB CIT PLAN 2000
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, STRONG URB REN
[7]  
[Anonymous], 4102 0 AUSTR SOC TRE
[8]  
*AUSTR BUR STAT, 2007, 1216 0 AUSTR STAND G
[9]  
BAMFORD G, 2008, RESHAPING AUSTR HOUS
[10]  
BAMFORD G, 2006, SHOULD HOUSING DENSI