Patient- and Caregiver-Reported Assessment Tools for Palliative Care: Summary of the 2017 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Technical Brief

被引：29

作者：

Aslakson, Rebecca A. ^{[1
,2
]}

Dy, Sydney M. ^{[3
]}

Wilson, Renee F. ^{[3
]}

Waldfogel, Julie ^{[8
]}

Zhang, Allen ^{[3
]}

Isenberg, Sarina R. ^{[7
]}

Blair, Alex ^{[6
]}

Sixon, Joshua ^{[9
]}

Lorenz, Karl A. ^{[10
,11
]}

Robinson, Karen A. ^{[3
,4
,5
]}

机构：

[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA

[2] Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr Johns Hopkins, Palliat Care Program, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA

[3] Johns Hopkins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD USA

[4] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA

[5] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA

[6] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD USA

[7] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Soc, Baltimore, MD USA

[8] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Pharm, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA

[9] Florida Int Univ, Herbert Wertheim Coll Med, Miami, FL 33199 USA

[10] VA Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Palo Alto, CA USA

[11] Stanford Sch Med, Dept Med, Palo Alto, CA USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT | 2017年 / 54卷 / 06期

基金：

美国医疗保健研究与质量局; 加拿大健康研究院;

关键词：

Patient-reported outcomes; assessment tools; family-reported outcomes; OF-LIFE CARE; BEREAVED FAMILY-MEMBERS; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT SCALE; OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT-TOOL; CHRONIC LUNG-DISEASE; ILL CANCER-PATIENTS; SHORT-FORM; HOSPICE CARE; COMPLICATED GRIEF;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.022

中图分类号：

R19 [保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Context. Assessment tools are data collection instruments that are completed by or with patients or caregivers and which collect data at the individual patient or caregiver level. Objectives. The objectives of this study are to 1) summarize palliative care assessment tools completed by or with patients or caregivers and 2) identify needs for future tool development and evaluation. Methods. We completed 1) a systematic review of systematic reviews; 2) a supplemental search of previous reviews and Web sites, and/or 3) a targeted search for primary articles when no tools existed in a domain. Paired investigators screened search results, assessed risk of bias, and abstracted data. We organized tools by domains from the National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Palliative Care and selected the most relevant, recent, and highest quality systematic review for each domain. Results. We included 10 systematic reviews and identified 152 tools (97 from systematic reviews and 55 from supplemental sources). Key gaps included no systematic review for pain and few tools assessing structural, cultural, spiritual, or ethical/legal domains, or patient-reported experience with end-of-life care. Psychometric information was available for many tools, but few studies evaluated responsiveness (sensitivity to change) and no studies compared tools. Conclusion. Few to no tools address the spiritual, ethical, or cultural domains or patient-reported experience with end-oflife care. While some data exist on psychometric properties of tools, the responsiveness of different tools to change and/or comparisons between tools have not been evaluated. Future research should focus on developing or testing tools that address domains for which few tools exist, evaluating responsiveness, and comparing tools. (C) 2017 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：961 / +

页数：28

共 180 条

[1] Hopelessness at the end of life: The utility of the hopelessness scale with terminally ill cancer patients [J].

Abbey, Jennifer G. ;

Rosenfeld, Barry ;

Pessin, Hayley ;

Breitbart, William .

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 11 :173-183

[2] Major depression, adjustment disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorder in terminally Ill cancer patients: Associated and predictive factors [J].

Akechi, T ;

Okuyama, T ;

Sugawara, Y ;

Nakano, T ;

Shima, Y ;

Uchitomi, Y .

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (10) :1957-1965

[3] Evaluation of quality-of-life measures for use in palliative care: a systematic review [J].

Albers, Gwenda ;

Echteld, Michael A. ;

de Vet, Henrica C. W. ;

Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D. ;

van der Linden, Mecheline H. M. ;

Deliens, Luc .

PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 24 (01) :17-37

[4] Families' Perceptions of Veterans' Distress Due to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-Related Symptoms at the End of Life [J].

Alici, Yesne ;

Smith, Dawn ;

Lu, Hien L. ;

Bailey, Amos ;

Shreve, Scott ;

Rosenfeld, Kenneth ;

Ritchie, Christine ;

Casarett, David J. .

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2010, 39 (03) :507-514

[5]

[Anonymous], 2004, NIH Consens State Sci Statements, V21, P1

[6]

[Anonymous], 2015, END OF LIFE CARE RES

[7]

[Anonymous], 2016, SYSTEMATIC REV INSTR

[8]

[Anonymous], 2015, CLIN PRACT GUID QUAL

[9]

[Anonymous], AHRQ PUBLICATION

[10]

[Anonymous], 2013, PAT REP OUTC PROS PE

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 →