After 40 years of regional and coordinated ship safety inspections: Destination reached or new point of departure?

被引:22
作者
Graziano, Armando [1 ]
Schroeder-Hinrichs, Jens-Uwe [1 ]
Olcer, Aykut I. [2 ]
机构
[1] World Maritime Univ, Maritime Risk & Syst Safety MaRiSa Res Grp, Fiskehamnsgatan 1, S-21118 Malmo, Sweden
[2] World Maritime Univ, Maritime Energy MarEner Res Grp, Malmo, Sweden
关键词
Port state control; EU maritime policy; Elite interviews; Template analysis; Safety inspections; Harmonization; PORT STATE CONTROL; HIGH-RISK VESSELS; JURISDICTION; IMPLEMENTATION; CONVENTION; CASUALTY; LAW;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.06.050
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Port State Control (PSC) is the major global strategy for fighting substandard shipping since the signature of The Hague Memorandum in 1978. In the last years, the increased volume of trade, the enlarged number of main international conventions and the highlighted differences among the various Regimes have posed new challenges to the modern system of PSC, which may need to find its new course. This paper examines the point of view of key maritime stakeholders with regard to the EU PSC regime. Elite interviews (n = 14) were conducted with subject matter experts ranging from policy makers, to industry and seafarers' representatives. The study aims to determine factors leading to difference in treatment among EU Member States. The study concludes that PSC in Europe seems to be the most efficient and reliable of the regional agreement on PSC. However, some discrepancies during the inspection process and outcome can be highlighted due to differences at the inspector and Member State level.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 226
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[41]   An improved methodology to measure flag performance for the shipping industry [J].
Perepelkin, Mihail ;
Knapp, Sabine ;
Perepelkin, German ;
de Pooter, Michiel .
MARINE POLICY, 2010, 34 (03) :395-405
[42]  
Ravira F.J., 2016, WMU J MARIT AFF, P1
[43]   Quality assurance of qualitative research: a review of the discourse [J].
Reynolds, Joanna ;
Kizito, James ;
Ezumah, Nkoli ;
Mangesho, Peter ;
Allen, Elizabeth ;
Chandler, Clare .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2011, 9
[44]  
Richards D., 1996, POLITICS, V16, P199, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1467-9256.1996.TB00039.X, 10.1111/j.1467-9256.1996.tb00039.x]
[45]   Identification of 'High Risk Vessels' in coastal waters [J].
Sage, B .
MARINE POLICY, 2005, 29 (04) :349-355
[46]   When jack gets out of the box: The problems of regulating a global industry [J].
Sampson, Helen ;
Bloor, Michael .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 41 (03) :551-569
[48]   The vital role of non-flag state actors in the pursuit of safer shipping [J].
Vorbach, JE .
OCEAN DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2001, 32 (01) :27-42
[49]   Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Traditions: epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences [J].
Yilmaz, Kaya .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2013, 48 (02) :311-325