What are risk factors for subsequent fracture after vertebral augmentation in patients with thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral fractures

被引:21
|
作者
Chen, Zhi [1 ]
Song, Chenyang [1 ]
Chen, Min [1 ]
Li, Hongxiang [2 ]
Ye, Yusong [3 ]
Liu, Wenge [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Dept Radiol, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Fuqing Affiliated Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture; Vertebroplasty; Kyphoplasty; Refracture; Paraspinal muscle; Spine sagittal alignment; Risk factor; COMPRESSION FRACTURES; PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY; RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS; REFRACTURE; CLEFT;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-021-04946-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Due to its unique mechanical characteristics, the incidence of subsequent fracture after vertebral augmentation is higher in thoracolumbar segment, but the causes have not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to comprehensively explore the potential risk factors for subsequent fracture in this region. Methods Patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture in thoracolumbar segment who received vertebral augmentation from January 2019 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into refracture group and non-refracture group according to the occurrence of refracture. The clinical information, imaging findings (cement distribution, spine sagittal parameters, degree of paraspinal muscle degeneration) and surgery related indicators of the included patients were collected and compared. Results A total of 109 patients were included, 13 patients in refracture group and 96 patients in non-refracture group. Univariate analysis revealed a significantly higher incidence of previous fracture, intravertebral cleft (IVC) and cement leakage, greater fatty infiltration of psoas (FIPS), fatty infiltration of erector spinae plus multifidus (FIES + MF), correction of body angle (BA), BA restoration rate and vertebral height restoration rate in refracture group. Further binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated previous fracture, IVC, FIPS and BA restoration rate were independent risk factors for subsequent fracture. According to ROC curve analysis, the prediction accuracy of BA restoration rate was the highest (area under the curve was 0.794), and the threshold value was 0.350. Conclusions Subsequent fracture might cause by the interplay of multiple risk factors. The previous fracture, IVC, FIPS and BA restoration rate were identified as independent risk factors. When the BA restoration rate exceeded 0.350, refractures were more likely to occur.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What are risk factors for subsequent fracture after vertebral augmentation in patients with thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral fractures
    Zhi Chen
    Chenyang Song
    Min Chen
    Hongxiang Li
    Yusong Ye
    Wenge Liu
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22
  • [2] Assessment of clinical, imaging, surgical risk factors for subsequent fracture following vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic patients
    Chen, Zhi
    Yao, Zhipeng
    Wu, Chengjian
    Wang, Guohua
    Liu, Wenge
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 51 (08) : 1623 - 1630
  • [3] Assessment of clinical, imaging, surgical risk factors for subsequent fracture following vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic patients
    Zhi Chen
    Zhipeng Yao
    Chengjian Wu
    Guohua Wang
    Wenge Liu
    Skeletal Radiology, 2022, 51 : 1623 - 1630
  • [4] Incidence and risk factors of subsequent vertebral fracture following percutaneous vertebral augmentation in postmenopausal women
    Cheng, Yuanpei
    Chen, Xipeng
    Li, Yongbo
    Tan, Zhe
    Yao, Xingchen
    Jiang, Rui
    Wu, Han
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [5] Does prophylactic vertebral augmentation reduce the refracture rate in osteoporotic vertebral fracture patients: a meta-analysis
    Chen, Zhi
    Song, Chenyang
    Lin, Hailin
    Sun, Jun
    Liu, Wenge
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 30 (09) : 2691 - 2697
  • [6] Risk factors for newly developed osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures following treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
    Lee, Bong Gun
    Choi, Jung-Hwan
    Kim, Dong-Yun
    Choi, Won Rak
    Lee, Seung Gun
    Kang, Chang-Nam
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (02) : 301 - 305
  • [7] Vertebral Augmentation for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures What is the Current Evidence Pro and Con?
    Gozel, Tarik
    Ortiz, A. Orlando
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 62 (06) : 979 - 991
  • [8] Risk of subsequent adjacent fractures after vertebral augmentation: A systematic review
    Ortega-Zufiria, Jose M.
    Sierra-Rodriguez, Mario
    Lopez-Ramirez, Yaiza
    Bernal-Pineiro, Jorge
    Silva-Mascaro, Daniel
    Tamarit-Degenhardt, Martin
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE NEUROCIENCIA, 2021, 22 (03): : 89 - 95
  • [9] What Are the Risk Factors for Adjacent Vertebral Fracture After Vertebral Augmentation? A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies
    Zhang, Tianyu
    Wang, Yanhua
    Zhang, Peixun
    Xue, Feng
    Zhang, Dianying
    Jiang, Baoguo
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (01) : 130 - 141
  • [10] Subsequent fractures after vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a meta-analysis
    Ding, Ji-Kang
    Zhao, Bin
    Zhai, Yi-fan
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2022, 45 (03) : 2349 - 2359