Addressing ethical gaps in 'Technology for Good': Foregrounding care and capabilities

被引:25
作者
Powell, Alison B. [1 ]
Ustek-Spilda, Funda [2 ]
Lehuede, Sebastian [3 ]
Shklovski, Irina [4 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Media & Commun, London WC2 2AE, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Oxford Internet Inst, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Ctr Human Rights & Governance, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Comp Humanities, Kobenhavn, England
关键词
Ethics; technology for good; start-ups; justice; practices; capability; DATA SCIENCE; VALUES;
D O I
10.1177/20539517221113774
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This paper identifies and addresses persistent gaps in the consideration of ethical practice in 'technology for good' development contexts. Its main contribution is to model an integrative approach using multiple ethical frameworks to analyse and understand the everyday nature of ethical practice, including in professional practice among 'technology for good' start-ups. The paper identifies inherent paradoxes in the 'technology for good' sector as well as ethical gaps related to (1) the sometimes-misplaced assignment of virtuousness to an individual; (2) difficulties in understanding social constraints on ethical action; and (3) the often unaccounted for mismatch between ethical intentions and outcomes in everyday practice, including in professional work associated with an 'ethical turn' in technology. These gaps persist even in contexts where ethics are foregrounded as matters of concern. To address the gaps, the paper suggests systemic, rather than individualized, considerations of care and capability applied to innovation settings, in combination with considerations of virtue and consequence. This paper advocates for addressing these challenges holistically in order to generate renewed capacity for change at a systemic level.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Toward an Ethics of Algorithms: Convening, Observation, Probability, and Timeliness [J].
Ananny, Mike .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2016, 41 (01) :93-117
[2]  
Annas J., 2011, INTELLIGENT VIRTUE, DOI [DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199228782.001.0001, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228782.001.0001]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Commodities and capabilities
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CHI 14 HUM FACT COMP, DOI DOI 10.1145/2559206.2559231
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, INFORM TECHNOLOGY GO
[6]   Computing Ethics Engaging the Ethics of Data Science in Practice Seeking more common ground between data scientists and their critics [J].
Barocas, Solon ;
Boyd, Danah .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2017, 60 (11) :23-25
[7]   From Ethics Washing to Ethics Bashing A View on Tech Ethics from Within Moral Philosophy [J].
Bietti, Elettra .
FAT* '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, 2020, :210-219
[8]   The New Spirit of Capitalism [J].
Boltanski, Luc ;
Chiapello, Eve .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICS CULTURE AND SOCIETY, 2005, 18 (3-4) :161-188
[9]  
Bowers John, 2020, Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, V1, P1, DOI [DOI 10.37016/MR-2020-005, 10.37016/mr-2020-005]
[10]   CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon [J].
Boyd, Danah ;
Crawford, Kate .
INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2012, 15 (05) :662-679