Prospects for incorporation of epigenetic biomarkers in human health and environmental risk assessment of chemicals

被引:22
作者
Jeremias, Guilherme [1 ,2 ]
Goncalves, Fernando J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Pereira, Joana L. [1 ,2 ]
Asselman, Jana [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, Dept Biol, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
[2] Univ Aveiro, CESAM Ctr Environm & Marine Studies, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
[3] Univ Ghent, Environm Toxicol Unit GhEnToxLab, Lab Environm Toxicol & Aquat Ecol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
epigenetic biomarkers; chemical exposure; environmental epigenetics; environmental risk assessment; human and ecological health; prospective and retrospective assessment; GLOBAL DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; PRENATAL ALCOHOL EXPOSURE; TUMOR-SUPPRESSOR GENE; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTION; CIGARETTE-SMOKING; SEDIMENT QUALITY; MARBLED CRAYFISH; AGOUTI MOUSE; CANCER;
D O I
10.1111/brv.12589
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Epigenetic mechanisms have gained relevance in human health and environmental studies, due to their pivotal role in disease, gene x environment interactions and adaptation to environmental change and/or contamination. Epigenetic mechanisms are highly responsive to external stimuli and a wide range of chemicals has been shown to determine specific epigenetic patterns in several organisms. Furthermore, the mitotic/meiotic inheritance of such epigenetic marks as well as the resulting changes in gene expression and cell/organismal phenotypes has now been demonstrated. Therefore, epigenetic signatures are interesting candidates for linking environmental exposures to disease as well as informing on past exposures to stressors. Accordingly, epigenetic biomarkers could be useful tools in both prospective and retrospective risk assessment but epigenetic endpoints are currently not yet incorporated into risk assessments. Achieving a better understanding on this apparent impasse, as well as identifying routes to promote the application of epigenetic biomarkers within environmental risk assessment frameworks are the objectives of this review. We first compile evidence from human health studies supporting the use of epigenetic exposure-associated changes as reliable biomarkers of exposure. Then, specifically focusing on environmental science, we examine the potential and challenges of developing epigenetic biomarkers for environmental fields, and discuss useful organisms and appropriate sequencing techniques to foster their development in this context. Finally, we discuss the practical incorporation of epigenetic biomarkers in the environmental risk assessment of chemicals, highlighting critical data gaps and making key recommendations for future research within a regulatory context.
引用
收藏
页码:822 / 846
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The environmental risk assessment of human pharmaceuticals in the overall EU regulatory affairs process
    Laenge, Reinhard
    Steger-Hartmann, Thomas
    Schweinfurth, Hermann
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 45 (03) : 223 - 228
  • [32] AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN USE OF THE OLD ANTIBIOTIC SULFAMETHOXAZOLE IN EUROPE
    Straub, Juerg Oliver
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2016, 35 (04) : 767 - 779
  • [33] Risk assessment of effects of cadmium on human health (IUPAC Technical Report)
    Nordberg, Gunnar F.
    Bernard, Alfred
    Diamond, Gary L.
    Duffus, John H.
    Illing, Paul
    Nordberg, Monica
    Bergdahl, Ingvar A.
    Jin, Taiyi
    Skerfving, Staffan
    PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 2018, 90 (04) : 755 - 808
  • [34] Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of plant pests EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
    Baker, Richard
    Candresse, Thierry
    Simon, Erzsebet Dormannsne
    Gilioli, Gianni
    Gregoire, Jean-Claude
    Jeger, Michael John
    Karadjova, Olia Evtimova
    Lovei, Gabor
    Makowski, David
    Manceau, Charles
    Navajas, Maria
    Puglia, Angelo Porta
    Rafoss, Trond
    Rossi, Vittorio
    Schans, Jan
    Schrader, Gritta
    Urek, Gregor
    van Lenteren, Johan Coert
    Vloutoglou, Irene
    Winter, Stephan
    Zlotina, Marina
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2011, 9 (12)
  • [35] Environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use according to European commission recommendations
    Huschek, G
    Hansen, PD
    Maurer, HH
    Krengel, D
    Kayser, A
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY, 2004, 19 (03) : 226 - 240
  • [36] Improving the regulatory environmental risk assessment of human pharmaceuticals: Required changes in the new legislation
    Gildemeister, Daniela
    Moermond, Caroline T. A.
    Berg, Cecilia
    Bergstrom, Ulrika
    Bielska, Lucie
    Evandri, Maria Grazia
    Franceschin, Marco
    Kolar, Boris
    Montforts, Mark H. M. M.
    Vaculik, Christine
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 142
  • [37] The triple exposure nexus of microplastic particles, plastic-associated chemicals, and environmental pollutants from a human health perspective
    Alijagic, Andi
    Suljevic, Damir
    Focak, Muhamed
    Sulejmanovic, Jasmina
    Sehovic, Elma
    Sarndahl, Eva
    Engwall, Magnus
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 188
  • [38] Commentary on the draft revised guideline on the environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use
    Whomsley, Rhys
    Brendler-Schwaab, Susanne
    Griffin, Eadaoin
    Jensen, John
    Moermond, Caroline
    Scholz, Birger
    Nilssen, Laila Sortvik
    Stemplewski, Henry
    Roennefahrt, Ines
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2019, 31 (1)
  • [39] Review of non-invasive biomarkers as a tool for exposure characterization in human health risk assessments
    Shilnikova, N.
    Momoli, F.
    Karyakina, N.
    Krewski, D.
    JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART B-CRITICAL REVIEWS, 2025, 28 (02): : 122 - 150
  • [40] Commentary on the draft revised guideline on the environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use
    Rhys Whomsley
    Susanne Brendler-Schwaab
    Eadaoin Griffin
    John Jensen
    Caroline Moermond
    Birger Scholz
    Laila Sortvik Nilssen
    Henry Stemplewski
    Ines Roennefahrt
    Environmental Sciences Europe, 2019, 31