Urine colour as an indicator for anastomotic leakage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:2
作者
Riikonen, Jarno [1 ,2 ]
Pakarainen, Tomi [1 ,2 ]
Siltari, Aino [1 ]
Pienimaki, Juha-Pekka [1 ,3 ]
Koskimaki, Juha [1 ,2 ]
Murtola, Teemu J. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Technol, Tampere, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, TAYS Canc Ctr, PL 2000, Tampere 33521, Finland
[3] Tampere Univ Hosp, Med Imaging Ctr, Tampere, Finland
[4] Seinajoki Cent Hosp, Dept Surg, Seinajoki, Finland
关键词
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; cystogram; urine colour; anastomosis; anastomotic leakage; VESICOURETHRAL ANASTOMOSIS; CATHETER REMOVAL; RISK-FACTORS; CYSTOGRAM; PREDICTS; EXTRAVASATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2020.1750474
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine whether macroscopic haematuria predicts urethrovesical anastomotic leakage after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) as well as a cystogram. Patients and methods: Participants were recruited before cystogram and catheter removal 5-14 days after RALP surgery. Urine colour in the collection bag was classified according to a three-step scale (clear, light red and dark red) and leakages in cystogram were graded with a four-step scale (Grade 0-3). Diagnostic accuracy parameters were calculated for urine colour. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate other leakage risk factors. Results: Of 214 patients, 201 (94%) had clear, six (3%) had light red and seven (3%) had dark red coloured urine. In the cystogram, 20 (9%) patients had leakage; 14 had Grade 1, five Grade 2 and one Grade 3 leakage. Overall, specificity and sensitivity of urine colour in predicting anastomotic leakage were 0.97 (95% CI = 0.95-100) and 0.38 (95% CI = 0.17-0.59), respectively. Negative and positive predictive values were 94% and 62%, respectively. Other significant risk factors for anastomotic leakage were previous transurethral resection or radiation therapy to the prostate, non-waterproof anastomosis at surgery, postoperative pelvic haematoma, long catheterization and surgeon's inexperience. In patients with no other risk factors, test sensitivity improved to 0.80 (95% CI = 0.45-1.15) and negative and positive predictive values to 99% and 44%, respectively. Conclusion: This prospective single-arm trial indicates that in patients with clear urine and no other risk factors for anastomotic leakage, a cystogram examination before urethral catheter removal can be safely omitted.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 207
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Overactive bladder is a negative predictor of achieving continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [J].
Yamada, Yuta ;
Fujimura, Tetsuya ;
Fukuhara, Hiroshi ;
Sugihara, Toru ;
Miyazaki, Hideyo ;
Nakagawa, Tohru ;
Kume, Haruki ;
Igawa, Yasuhiko ;
Homma, Yukio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (10) :749-756
[42]   Incidence of bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy [J].
Breyer, Benjamin N. ;
Davis, Cole B. ;
Cowan, Janet E. ;
Kane, Christopher J. ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (11) :1734-1738
[43]   Prediction of a positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [J].
Yang, Ching-Wei ;
Wang, Hsiao-Hsien ;
Hassouna, Mohamed Fayez ;
Chand, Manish ;
Huang, William J. S. ;
Chung, Hsiao-Jen .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
[44]   Management of anastomotic leakage after robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with an intrathoracic anastomosis [J].
de Groot, Eline M. ;
Bronzwaer, Sebastiaan F. C. ;
Goense, Lucas ;
Kingma, B. Feike ;
van der Horst, Sylvia ;
van den Berg, Jan Willem ;
Ruurda, Jelle P. ;
van Hillegersberg, Richard .
DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2023, 36 (06)
[45]   Transient acute kidney injury observed immediately after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy but not after open radical prostatectomy [J].
Naito, Akihiro ;
Taguchi, Satoru ;
Suzuki, Motofumi ;
Kawai, Taketo ;
Uchida, Kanji ;
Fujimura, Tetsuya ;
Fukuhara, Hiroshi ;
Kume, Haruki .
MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 13 (03) :1-5
[46]   A Clinician's Guide to Avoiding and Managing Common Complications During and After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Pucheril, Daniel ;
Campbell, Logan ;
Bauer, Ricarda M. ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Sammon, Jesse D. ;
Schlomm, Thorsten .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2016, 2 (01) :30-48
[47]   Short-term Results after Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Compared to Open Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Wallerstedt, Anna ;
Tyritzis, Stavros I. ;
Thorsteinsdottir, Thordis ;
Carlsson, Stefan ;
Stranne, Johan ;
Gustafsson, Ove ;
Hugosson, Jonas ;
Bjartell, Anders ;
Wilderaeng, Ulrica ;
Wiklund, N. Peter ;
Steineck, Gunnar ;
Haglind, Eva .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (04) :660-670
[48]   Surgical site infections after radical prostatectomy: A comparative study between robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy [J].
Osmonov, Daniar K. ;
Faddan, Amr A. ;
Aksenov, Alexey V. ;
Naumann, Carsten M. ;
Rapoport, Leonid M. ;
Bezrukov, Evgeny A. ;
Tsarichenko, Dmitry G. ;
Juenemann, Klaus P. .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 44 (04) :303-310
[49]   Comparison of Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis [J].
Xu, Jiang-Nan ;
Xu, Zhen-Yu ;
Yin, Hu-Ming .
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
[50]   Safety and feasibility of outpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [J].
Banapour, Pooya ;
Elliott, Peter ;
Jabaji, Ramzi ;
Parekh, Ashish ;
Pathak, Apurba ;
Merchant, Madhur ;
Tamaddon, Kirk .
JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2019, 13 (02) :261-265