Urine colour as an indicator for anastomotic leakage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:2
作者
Riikonen, Jarno [1 ,2 ]
Pakarainen, Tomi [1 ,2 ]
Siltari, Aino [1 ]
Pienimaki, Juha-Pekka [1 ,3 ]
Koskimaki, Juha [1 ,2 ]
Murtola, Teemu J. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Technol, Tampere, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, TAYS Canc Ctr, PL 2000, Tampere 33521, Finland
[3] Tampere Univ Hosp, Med Imaging Ctr, Tampere, Finland
[4] Seinajoki Cent Hosp, Dept Surg, Seinajoki, Finland
关键词
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; cystogram; urine colour; anastomosis; anastomotic leakage; VESICOURETHRAL ANASTOMOSIS; CATHETER REMOVAL; RISK-FACTORS; CYSTOGRAM; PREDICTS; EXTRAVASATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2020.1750474
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine whether macroscopic haematuria predicts urethrovesical anastomotic leakage after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) as well as a cystogram. Patients and methods: Participants were recruited before cystogram and catheter removal 5-14 days after RALP surgery. Urine colour in the collection bag was classified according to a three-step scale (clear, light red and dark red) and leakages in cystogram were graded with a four-step scale (Grade 0-3). Diagnostic accuracy parameters were calculated for urine colour. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate other leakage risk factors. Results: Of 214 patients, 201 (94%) had clear, six (3%) had light red and seven (3%) had dark red coloured urine. In the cystogram, 20 (9%) patients had leakage; 14 had Grade 1, five Grade 2 and one Grade 3 leakage. Overall, specificity and sensitivity of urine colour in predicting anastomotic leakage were 0.97 (95% CI = 0.95-100) and 0.38 (95% CI = 0.17-0.59), respectively. Negative and positive predictive values were 94% and 62%, respectively. Other significant risk factors for anastomotic leakage were previous transurethral resection or radiation therapy to the prostate, non-waterproof anastomosis at surgery, postoperative pelvic haematoma, long catheterization and surgeon's inexperience. In patients with no other risk factors, test sensitivity improved to 0.80 (95% CI = 0.45-1.15) and negative and positive predictive values to 99% and 44%, respectively. Conclusion: This prospective single-arm trial indicates that in patients with clear urine and no other risk factors for anastomotic leakage, a cystogram examination before urethral catheter removal can be safely omitted.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 207
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   The impact of haemostatic agent used during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on post-op infection and anastomotic leak [J].
Krishnan, Jamie ;
Brennan, Rory ;
El-Koubani, Osman ;
Sivathasan, Sailantra ;
Gallagher, Kevin ;
Taylor, Linda ;
Sharma, Abhishek ;
Good, Daniel ;
McNeill, Alan .
BJUI COMPASS, 2025, 6 (07)
[22]   What is the long-term relevance of clinically detected postoperative anastomotic urine leakage after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy? [J].
Rebuck, David A. ;
Haywood, Samuel ;
McDermott, Kelly ;
Perry, Kent T. ;
Nadler, Robert B. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (05) :733-738
[23]   Examination of Necessity for Pelvic Drain Placement After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Iwamoto, Hiroaki ;
Kadono, Yoshifumi ;
Nakagawa, Ryunosuke ;
Makino, Tomoyuki ;
Kadomoto, Suguru ;
Yaegashi, Hiroshi ;
Iijima, Masashi ;
Kawaguchi, Shohei ;
Nohara, Takahiro ;
Shigehara, Kazuyoshi ;
Izumi, Kouji ;
Mizokami, Atsushi .
IN VIVO, 2021, 35 (05) :2895-2899
[24]   High BMI and Surgical Time Are Significant Predictors of Lymphocele after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Gloger, Simon ;
Wagner, Christian ;
Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi ;
Siemer, Stefan ;
Arndt, Madeleine ;
Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe ;
Franz, Toni ;
Ubrig, Burkhard .
CANCERS, 2023, 15 (09)
[25]   Strategy for laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [J].
Eto, Shohei ;
Yoshikawa, Kozo ;
Yoshimoto, Toshiaki ;
Takasu, Chie ;
Kashihara, Hideya ;
Nishi, Masaaki ;
Tokunaga, Takuya ;
Nakao, Toshihiro ;
Higashijima, Jun ;
Iwata, Takashi ;
Shimada, Mitsuo .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2022, 15 (01) :155-161
[26]   Comparison of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis [J].
Jiang, Yu-Li ;
Zheng, Gao-Feng ;
Jiang, Ze-Peng ;
Zhen-Li ;
Zhou, Xie-Lai ;
Zhou, Jin ;
Ye, Chun-Hua ;
Wang, Kang-Er .
BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
[27]   Outcomes of Salvage Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Focal Ablation for Prostate Cancer in Comparison to Primary Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Matched Analysis [J].
Bhat, K. R. Seetharam ;
Moschovas, Marcio Covas ;
Sandri, Marco ;
Noel, Jonathan ;
Reddy, Sunil ;
Perera, Roshane ;
Rogers, Travis ;
Roof, Shannon ;
Patel, Vipul R. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (05) :1192-1197
[28]   Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Ready To Be Counted? [J].
Quoc-Dien Trinh ;
Ghani, Khurshid R. ;
Menon, Mani .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (01) :16-18
[29]   The current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [J].
Dasgupta, Prokar ;
Kirby, Roger S. .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) :90-93
[30]   The Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Gumus, Eyup ;
Boylu, Ugur ;
Turan, Turgay ;
Onol, Fikret Fatih .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (10) :1633-1637