Urine colour as an indicator for anastomotic leakage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:2
作者
Riikonen, Jarno [1 ,2 ]
Pakarainen, Tomi [1 ,2 ]
Siltari, Aino [1 ]
Pienimaki, Juha-Pekka [1 ,3 ]
Koskimaki, Juha [1 ,2 ]
Murtola, Teemu J. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Technol, Tampere, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, TAYS Canc Ctr, PL 2000, Tampere 33521, Finland
[3] Tampere Univ Hosp, Med Imaging Ctr, Tampere, Finland
[4] Seinajoki Cent Hosp, Dept Surg, Seinajoki, Finland
关键词
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; cystogram; urine colour; anastomosis; anastomotic leakage; VESICOURETHRAL ANASTOMOSIS; CATHETER REMOVAL; RISK-FACTORS; CYSTOGRAM; PREDICTS; EXTRAVASATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2020.1750474
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine whether macroscopic haematuria predicts urethrovesical anastomotic leakage after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) as well as a cystogram. Patients and methods: Participants were recruited before cystogram and catheter removal 5-14 days after RALP surgery. Urine colour in the collection bag was classified according to a three-step scale (clear, light red and dark red) and leakages in cystogram were graded with a four-step scale (Grade 0-3). Diagnostic accuracy parameters were calculated for urine colour. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate other leakage risk factors. Results: Of 214 patients, 201 (94%) had clear, six (3%) had light red and seven (3%) had dark red coloured urine. In the cystogram, 20 (9%) patients had leakage; 14 had Grade 1, five Grade 2 and one Grade 3 leakage. Overall, specificity and sensitivity of urine colour in predicting anastomotic leakage were 0.97 (95% CI = 0.95-100) and 0.38 (95% CI = 0.17-0.59), respectively. Negative and positive predictive values were 94% and 62%, respectively. Other significant risk factors for anastomotic leakage were previous transurethral resection or radiation therapy to the prostate, non-waterproof anastomosis at surgery, postoperative pelvic haematoma, long catheterization and surgeon's inexperience. In patients with no other risk factors, test sensitivity improved to 0.80 (95% CI = 0.45-1.15) and negative and positive predictive values to 99% and 44%, respectively. Conclusion: This prospective single-arm trial indicates that in patients with clear urine and no other risk factors for anastomotic leakage, a cystogram examination before urethral catheter removal can be safely omitted.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 207
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Examination of Necessity for Pelvic Drain Placement After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Iwamoto, Hiroaki
    Kadono, Yoshifumi
    Nakagawa, Ryunosuke
    Makino, Tomoyuki
    Kadomoto, Suguru
    Yaegashi, Hiroshi
    Iijima, Masashi
    Kawaguchi, Shohei
    Nohara, Takahiro
    Shigehara, Kazuyoshi
    Izumi, Kouji
    Mizokami, Atsushi
    IN VIVO, 2021, 35 (05): : 2895 - 2899
  • [22] Strategy for laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Eto, Shohei
    Yoshikawa, Kozo
    Yoshimoto, Toshiaki
    Takasu, Chie
    Kashihara, Hideya
    Nishi, Masaaki
    Tokunaga, Takuya
    Nakao, Toshihiro
    Higashijima, Jun
    Iwata, Takashi
    Shimada, Mitsuo
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2022, 15 (01) : 155 - 161
  • [23] High BMI and Surgical Time Are Significant Predictors of Lymphocele after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Gloger, Simon
    Wagner, Christian
    Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
    Siemer, Stefan
    Arndt, Madeleine
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Franz, Toni
    Ubrig, Burkhard
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [24] Comparison of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yu-Li
    Zheng, Gao-Feng
    Jiang, Ze-Peng
    Zhen-Li
    Zhou, Xie-Lai
    Zhou, Jin
    Ye, Chun-Hua
    Wang, Kang-Er
    BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [25] Outcomes of Salvage Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Focal Ablation for Prostate Cancer in Comparison to Primary Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Matched Analysis
    Bhat, K. R. Seetharam
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Sandri, Marco
    Noel, Jonathan
    Reddy, Sunil
    Perera, Roshane
    Rogers, Travis
    Roof, Shannon
    Patel, Vipul R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (05): : 1192 - 1197
  • [26] Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Ready To Be Counted?
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Ghani, Khurshid R.
    Menon, Mani
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (01) : 16 - 18
  • [27] The Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Gumus, Eyup
    Boylu, Ugur
    Turan, Turgay
    Onol, Fikret Fatih
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (10) : 1633 - 1637
  • [28] The current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Kirby, Roger S.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) : 90 - 93
  • [29] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Sun, Maxine
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 (20) : 2767 - 2773
  • [30] Peritoneal Flap in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Bruendl, Johannes
    Lenart, Sebastian
    Stojanoski, Gjoko
    Gilfrich, Christian
    Rosenhammer, Bernd
    Stolzlechner, Michael
    Ponholzer, Anton
    Dreissig, Christina
    Weikert, Steffen
    Burger, Maximilian
    May, Matthias
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 117 (14): : 243 - +