Urine colour as an indicator for anastomotic leakage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:2
|
作者
Riikonen, Jarno [1 ,2 ]
Pakarainen, Tomi [1 ,2 ]
Siltari, Aino [1 ]
Pienimaki, Juha-Pekka [1 ,3 ]
Koskimaki, Juha [1 ,2 ]
Murtola, Teemu J. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Technol, Tampere, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, TAYS Canc Ctr, PL 2000, Tampere 33521, Finland
[3] Tampere Univ Hosp, Med Imaging Ctr, Tampere, Finland
[4] Seinajoki Cent Hosp, Dept Surg, Seinajoki, Finland
关键词
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; cystogram; urine colour; anastomosis; anastomotic leakage; VESICOURETHRAL ANASTOMOSIS; CATHETER REMOVAL; RISK-FACTORS; CYSTOGRAM; PREDICTS; EXTRAVASATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2020.1750474
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine whether macroscopic haematuria predicts urethrovesical anastomotic leakage after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) as well as a cystogram. Patients and methods: Participants were recruited before cystogram and catheter removal 5-14 days after RALP surgery. Urine colour in the collection bag was classified according to a three-step scale (clear, light red and dark red) and leakages in cystogram were graded with a four-step scale (Grade 0-3). Diagnostic accuracy parameters were calculated for urine colour. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate other leakage risk factors. Results: Of 214 patients, 201 (94%) had clear, six (3%) had light red and seven (3%) had dark red coloured urine. In the cystogram, 20 (9%) patients had leakage; 14 had Grade 1, five Grade 2 and one Grade 3 leakage. Overall, specificity and sensitivity of urine colour in predicting anastomotic leakage were 0.97 (95% CI = 0.95-100) and 0.38 (95% CI = 0.17-0.59), respectively. Negative and positive predictive values were 94% and 62%, respectively. Other significant risk factors for anastomotic leakage were previous transurethral resection or radiation therapy to the prostate, non-waterproof anastomosis at surgery, postoperative pelvic haematoma, long catheterization and surgeon's inexperience. In patients with no other risk factors, test sensitivity improved to 0.80 (95% CI = 0.45-1.15) and negative and positive predictive values to 99% and 44%, respectively. Conclusion: This prospective single-arm trial indicates that in patients with clear urine and no other risk factors for anastomotic leakage, a cystogram examination before urethral catheter removal can be safely omitted.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 207
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical significance and risk factors of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study
    Kakutani, Shigenori
    Takeshima, Yuta
    Yamada, Yuta
    Fujimura, Tetsuya
    Nagamoto, Shoichi
    Enomoto, Yutaka
    Hakozaki, Yuji
    Kimura, Naoki
    Teshima, Taro
    Akiyama, Yoshiyuki
    Sato, Yusuke
    Kawai, Taketo
    Yamada, Daisuke
    Kume, Haruki
    BMC UROLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [2] Anastomotic complications after robot-assisted laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy
    Jacobsen, Andre
    Berg, Kasper Drimer
    Iversen, Peter
    Brasso, Klaus
    Roder, Martin Andreas
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 50 (04) : 274 - 279
  • [3] Urine colour after radical prostatectomy predicts urinary leakage at the vesicourethral anastomosis
    Schoeppler, Gita M.
    Zaak, Dirk
    Schuhmann, Petra
    Stief, Christian G.
    Buchner, Alexander
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 46 (05): : 337 - 342
  • [4] Anastomotic leaks and catheter time after salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Bandini, Marco
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Fossati, Nicola
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 : S141 - S143
  • [5] Robot-Assisted radical Prostatectomy
    Wagner, Christian
    Addali, Mustapha
    Witt, Joern H.
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2020, 51 (05) : 483 - 497
  • [6] Side-fenestrated catheter decreases leakage at the urethrovesical anastomosis after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Riikonen, Jarno
    Kaipia, Antti
    Matikainen, Mika
    Koskimaki, Juha
    Kylmala, Timo
    Tammela, Teuvo L.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 48 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [7] EVOLUTION OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Orvieto, M. A.
    Patel, V. R.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 98 (02) : 76 - 88
  • [8] Influence of Modified Posterior Reconstruction of the Rhabdosphincter on Early Recovery of Continence and Anastomotic Leakage Rates after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Orvieto, Marcelo A.
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Patel, Vipul R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (01) : 72 - 80
  • [9] Urinary Leakage after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Is Always Predictive of Functional Results?
    Fiorello, Nicolo
    Zucchi, Alessandro
    Gregori, Francesco
    Romei, Gregorio
    Fiorenzo, Salvatore
    Di Benedetto, Andrea
    Bossa, Riccardo
    Mogorovich, Andrea
    Summonti, Daniele
    Benvenuti, Sandro
    Pastore, Antonio Luigi
    Sepich, Carlo Alberto
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2025, 109 (01) : 68 - 73
  • [10] Predictors of Early Continence after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Yamada, Yuta
    Fujimura, Tetsuya
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    Sugihara, Toru
    Nakagawa, Tohru
    Kume, Haruki
    Igawa, Yasuhiko
    Homma, Yukio
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2018, 10 (03) : 287 - 291