Higher rate of complications with uncemented compared to cemented total hip arthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures: A randomised controlled trial of 50 patients

被引:6
|
作者
Clement, N. D. [1 ]
van der Linden, Marietta [2 ]
Keating, J. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Queen Margaret Univ, Ctr Hlth Act & Rehabil Res, Edinburgh EH21 6UU, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY | 2021年 / 31卷 / 03期
关键词
Total hip arthroplasty; Cemented; Uncement; Outcome; Function; NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY; FEMORAL-NECK FRACTURES; REPLACEMENT; HEMIARTHROPLASTY; SURVIVAL; DEATH;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-020-02808-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe primary aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome of uncemented with cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced intracapsular hip fractures. The secondary aims were to assess length of surgery, blood loss, complications and revision rate between the two groups.MethodsA prospective double-blind randomised control trial was conducted. Fifty patients with an intracapsular hip fracture meeting the inclusion criteria were randomised to either an uncemented (n=25) or cemented (n=25) THA. There were no differences (p>0.45) in age, gender, health status or preinjury hip function between the groups. The Oxford hip score (OHS), Harris Hip score (HHS), EuroQol 5-dimensional (EQ5D), timed get up-and-go (TUG), pain and patient satisfaction were used to assess outcome. These were assessed at 4, 12 and 72 months after surgery, apart from the TUG which as only assessed as 6 months.ResultsThe study was terminated early due to the significantly (n=8, p=0.004) higher rate of intraoperative complications in the uncemented group: three fractures of the proximal femur and five conversions to a cemented acetabular component. There were no significant (p >= 0.09) differences in the functional measures (OHS, HSS, EQ5D, TUG and pain) or patient satisfaction between the groups. There was no difference in operative time (p=0.75) or blood loss (p=0.66) between the groups. There were two early revisions prior to 3 months post-operatively in the uncemented group and none in the cemented group, but this was not significant (log rank p=0.16).ConclusionThere was a high rate of intraoperative complications, which may be due to poor bone quality in this patient group. There were no ergonomic or functional advantages demonstrated between uncemented and cemented THA. Cemented THA should remain as the preferred choice for the treatment of intracapsular hip fractures for patients that meet the criteria for this procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 594
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparing uncemented, hybrid and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in young patients, a New Zealand Joint Registry study
    Alexander Buckenham Boyle
    Mark Zhu
    Chris Frampton
    Andrew Vane
    Vaughan Poutawera
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2022, 142 : 2371 - 2380
  • [42] DUAL MOBILITY CUPS REDUCE DISLOCATION RATE IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY FOR DISPLACED FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES.
    Zagorov, Maksim
    Mihov, Kalin
    Dobrilov, Svetoslav
    Tabakov, Atanas
    Gospodinov, Alexander
    Nenova, Gergana
    JOURNAL OF IMAB, 2018, 24 (02): : 2077 - 2081
  • [43] Best prostheses for hip fractures: total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty, cemented versus uncemented, dual mobility and constrained liners versus standard cups
    Hernigou, Philippe
    Trousselier, Matthieu
    Roubineau, Francois
    Pariat, Jacques
    Guissou, Isaac
    MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA, 2016, 67 (02) : 106 - 111
  • [44] Total Hip Arthroplasty After In Situ Fixation of Minimally Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients
    Hernandez, Nicholas M.
    Chalmers, Brian P.
    Perry, Kevin I.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Yuan, Brandon J.
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (01): : 144 - 148
  • [45] Cemented versus uncemented femoral component total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis: retrospective analysis with 5-year follow-up
    Yang, Chen
    Han, Xiulan
    Wang, Jie
    Yuan, Zheng
    Wang, Tao
    Zhao, Mingdong
    Han, Guowei
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 47 (04) : 1610 - 1619
  • [46] Treatment of displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck with total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty A SINGLE-CENTRE REVIEW OF 2,721 PATIENTS
    Viswanath, A.
    Malik, A.
    Chan, W.
    Klasan, A.
    Walton, N. P.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2020, 102B (06): : 693 - 698
  • [47] A process evaluation of the WHiTE Two trial comparing total hip arthroplasty with and without dual mobility component in the treatment of displaced intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur
    Huxley, C.
    Achten, J.
    Costa, M. L.
    Griffiths, F.
    Griffin, X. L.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2016, 5 (10): : 444 - 452
  • [48] Complications following total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in patients with a history of lumbar spinal fusion
    Ofa, Sione A.
    Lupica, Gregory M.
    Lee, Olivia C.
    Sherman, William F.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (02) : 817 - 827
  • [49] Randomised controlled trial of a comprehensive protocol for preventing constipation following total hip arthroplasty
    Yue, Chen
    Liu, Youwen
    Zhang, Xue
    Xu, Bin
    Sheng, Hongfeng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2020, 29 (15-16) : 2863 - 2871
  • [50] Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial
    van Beers, Loes W. A. H.
    van Oldenrijk, Jakob
    Scholtes, Vanessa A. B.
    Geerdink, Carel H.
    Niers, Bob B. A. M.
    Runne, Wouter
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Poolman, Rudolf W.
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (03):