Higher rate of complications with uncemented compared to cemented total hip arthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures: A randomised controlled trial of 50 patients

被引:6
|
作者
Clement, N. D. [1 ]
van der Linden, Marietta [2 ]
Keating, J. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Queen Margaret Univ, Ctr Hlth Act & Rehabil Res, Edinburgh EH21 6UU, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY | 2021年 / 31卷 / 03期
关键词
Total hip arthroplasty; Cemented; Uncement; Outcome; Function; NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY; FEMORAL-NECK FRACTURES; REPLACEMENT; HEMIARTHROPLASTY; SURVIVAL; DEATH;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-020-02808-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe primary aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome of uncemented with cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced intracapsular hip fractures. The secondary aims were to assess length of surgery, blood loss, complications and revision rate between the two groups.MethodsA prospective double-blind randomised control trial was conducted. Fifty patients with an intracapsular hip fracture meeting the inclusion criteria were randomised to either an uncemented (n=25) or cemented (n=25) THA. There were no differences (p>0.45) in age, gender, health status or preinjury hip function between the groups. The Oxford hip score (OHS), Harris Hip score (HHS), EuroQol 5-dimensional (EQ5D), timed get up-and-go (TUG), pain and patient satisfaction were used to assess outcome. These were assessed at 4, 12 and 72 months after surgery, apart from the TUG which as only assessed as 6 months.ResultsThe study was terminated early due to the significantly (n=8, p=0.004) higher rate of intraoperative complications in the uncemented group: three fractures of the proximal femur and five conversions to a cemented acetabular component. There were no significant (p >= 0.09) differences in the functional measures (OHS, HSS, EQ5D, TUG and pain) or patient satisfaction between the groups. There was no difference in operative time (p=0.75) or blood loss (p=0.66) between the groups. There were two early revisions prior to 3 months post-operatively in the uncemented group and none in the cemented group, but this was not significant (log rank p=0.16).ConclusionThere was a high rate of intraoperative complications, which may be due to poor bone quality in this patient group. There were no ergonomic or functional advantages demonstrated between uncemented and cemented THA. Cemented THA should remain as the preferred choice for the treatment of intracapsular hip fractures for patients that meet the criteria for this procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 594
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] HOPE-trial: hemiarthroplasty compared to total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly-elderly, a randomized controlled trial
    Olof Sköldenberg
    Ghazi Chammout
    Sebastian Mukka
    Olle Muren
    Hans Nåsell
    Carl-Johan Hedbeck
    Mats Salemyr
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 16
  • [22] Total hip arthroplasty compared to bipolar and unipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced hip fractures in the elderly: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Migliorini, Filippo
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Trivellas, Mira
    Eschweiler, Joerg
    Hildebrand, Frank
    Betsch, Marcel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2022, 48 (04) : 2655 - 2666
  • [23] Mortality associated with cemented and uncemented fixation of hemiarthroplasty and total hip replacement in the surgical management of intracapsular hip fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dominguez, Elizabeth D.
    Kumar, Nakulan N.
    Whitehouse, Michael R.
    Sayers, Adrian
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2022, 53 (07): : 2605 - 2616
  • [24] Hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of a displaced intracapsular fracture in active elderly patients 12-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF RANDOMISED TRIAL
    Tol, M. C. J. M.
    van den Bekerom, M. P. J.
    Sierevelt, I. N.
    Hilverdink, E. F.
    Raaymakers, E. L. F. B.
    Goslings, J. C.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2017, 99B (02): : 250 - 254
  • [25] Variability in the Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures
    Chaudhry, Harman
    Mundi, Raman
    Einhorn, Thomas A.
    Russell, Thomas A.
    Parvizi, Javad
    Bhandari, Mohit
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (04): : 569 - 574
  • [26] Conversion from a failed proximal femoral nail anti-rotation to a cemented or uncemented total hip arthroplasty device: a retrospective review of 198 hips with previous intertrochanteric femur fractures
    Yu, Weiguang
    Han, Xiulan
    Chen, Wenli
    Mao, Shuai
    Zhao, Mingdong
    Zhang, Xinchao
    Han, Guowei
    Ye, Junxing
    Chen, Meiji
    Zhuang, Jintao
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [27] Lower reoperation rate for cemented femoral stem than for uncemented femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty following a displaced femoral neck fracture
    Andersen, Michelle F.
    Jakobsen, Thomas
    Bensen, Anne S.
    Krarup, Niels
    SICOT-J, 2015, 1
  • [28] Cemented Thompson hemiarthroplasty versus cemented Exeter Trauma Stem (ETS) hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fractures: A randomised trial of 200 patients
    Parker, Martyn J.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2012, 43 (06): : 807 - 810
  • [29] Comparing uncemented, hybrid and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in young patients, a New Zealand Joint Registry study
    Boyle, Alexander Buckenham
    Zhu, Mark
    Frampton, Chris
    Vane, Andrew
    Poutawera, Vaughan
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2022, 142 (09) : 2371 - 2380
  • [30] Effectiveness and safety of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of intracapsular hip fractures A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Kumar, N. Nantha
    Kunutsor, S. K.
    Fernandez, M. A.
    Dominguez, E.
    Parsons, N.
    Costa, M. L.
    Whitehouse, M. R.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2020, 102B (09): : 1113 - 1121