Higher rate of complications with uncemented compared to cemented total hip arthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures: A randomised controlled trial of 50 patients

被引:6
|
作者
Clement, N. D. [1 ]
van der Linden, Marietta [2 ]
Keating, J. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Queen Margaret Univ, Ctr Hlth Act & Rehabil Res, Edinburgh EH21 6UU, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY | 2021年 / 31卷 / 03期
关键词
Total hip arthroplasty; Cemented; Uncement; Outcome; Function; NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY; FEMORAL-NECK FRACTURES; REPLACEMENT; HEMIARTHROPLASTY; SURVIVAL; DEATH;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-020-02808-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe primary aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome of uncemented with cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced intracapsular hip fractures. The secondary aims were to assess length of surgery, blood loss, complications and revision rate between the two groups.MethodsA prospective double-blind randomised control trial was conducted. Fifty patients with an intracapsular hip fracture meeting the inclusion criteria were randomised to either an uncemented (n=25) or cemented (n=25) THA. There were no differences (p>0.45) in age, gender, health status or preinjury hip function between the groups. The Oxford hip score (OHS), Harris Hip score (HHS), EuroQol 5-dimensional (EQ5D), timed get up-and-go (TUG), pain and patient satisfaction were used to assess outcome. These were assessed at 4, 12 and 72 months after surgery, apart from the TUG which as only assessed as 6 months.ResultsThe study was terminated early due to the significantly (n=8, p=0.004) higher rate of intraoperative complications in the uncemented group: three fractures of the proximal femur and five conversions to a cemented acetabular component. There were no significant (p >= 0.09) differences in the functional measures (OHS, HSS, EQ5D, TUG and pain) or patient satisfaction between the groups. There was no difference in operative time (p=0.75) or blood loss (p=0.66) between the groups. There were two early revisions prior to 3 months post-operatively in the uncemented group and none in the cemented group, but this was not significant (log rank p=0.16).ConclusionThere was a high rate of intraoperative complications, which may be due to poor bone quality in this patient group. There were no ergonomic or functional advantages demonstrated between uncemented and cemented THA. Cemented THA should remain as the preferred choice for the treatment of intracapsular hip fractures for patients that meet the criteria for this procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 594
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Higher rate of complications with uncemented compared to cemented total hip arthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures: A randomised controlled trial of 50 patients
    N. D. Clement
    Marietta van der Linden
    J. F. Keating
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2021, 31 : 587 - 594
  • [2] Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fractures A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL IN 400 PATIENTS
    Parker, M. I.
    Pryor, G.
    Gurusamy, K.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2010, 92B (01): : 116 - 122
  • [3] Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip: a randomized trial of 400 patients
    Parker, M. J.
    Cawley, S.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2020, 102B (01): : 11 - 16
  • [4] Uncemented versus cemented total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis: A retrospective analysis
    Zhou, Xiang
    Chen, Meiji
    Yu, Weiguang
    Han, Guowei
    Ye, Junxing
    Zhuang, Jintao
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (08)
  • [5] Implant survival in uncemented total hip arthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures: outcomes of 115 patients in a single center
    Dogger, Melissa N.
    Fransen, Bas L.
    Sierevelt, Inger N.
    Nolte, Peter A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2020, 30 (05): : 885 - 893
  • [6] Patient Selection Criteria for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Displaced Intracapsular Hip Fractures: Are They Appropriate?
    Khan, Muhammad E. A.
    Mathew, Sanju
    Salam, Syazrah
    Lambert, Sally
    Price, James D.
    Willett, Keith M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2009, 35 (05) : 470 - 474
  • [7] Long-term outcomes of cemented compared to uncemented femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients
    Axenhus, Michael
    Chammout, Ghazi
    Kelly-Pettersson, Paula
    Mukka, Sebastian
    Magneli, Martin
    Skoeldenberg, Olof
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2025, 51 (01)
  • [8] Primary total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in older patients: systematic review
    Hopley, Colin
    Stengel, Dirk
    Ekkernkamp, Axel
    Wich, Michael
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 : 1397
  • [9] Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Azegami, Shin
    Gurusamy, Kurinchi S.
    Parker, Martyn J.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 21 (05) : 509 - 517
  • [10] A long term follow-up for a randomised trial of total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures
    Parker, Martyn J.
    Cawley, Shirley
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2023, 54 (08):