INTRACRANIAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING ARTIFACTS AND PSEUDOLESIONS IN DOGS AND CATS

被引:11
作者
Cooper, Jocelyn J. [1 ]
Young, Benjamin D. [2 ]
Hoffman, Anton [3 ]
Bratton, Gerald [3 ]
Hicks, Daniel G. [1 ]
Tidwell, Amy [4 ]
Levine, Jonathan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Small Anim Clin Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Large Anim Clin Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Vet Integrated Biosci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] Vet Imaging Consultant, Uxbridge, MA 01569 USA
关键词
CSF signal void; FLAIR; petrous temporal bone; pituitary lobe hyperintensity; susceptibility artifact; trigeminal nerve; HYPERINTENSE CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID; INVERSION-RECOVERY IMAGES; T1-WEIGHTED MR-IMAGES; SIGNAL-VOID SIGN; PITUITARY-GLAND; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; POSTERIOR LOBE; TRIGEMINAL NERVE; FIELD-STRENGTH; ENHANCED MR;
D O I
10.1111/j.1740-8261.2010.01713.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Normal anatomic variation, study design, external factors, and tissue characteristics can all influence the manifestation of structures on magnetic resonance images (MRI). For the purpose of this review, imaging artifacts are considered to be nonpathologic abnormalities resulting from study design, intrinsic tissue characteristics, or external factors, while MRI pseudolesions are due to normal anatomic variation. Awareness of imaging artifacts and pseudolesions, as well as normal anatomic structures, is important when determining pathologic vs. normal or clinically insignificant abnormalities. The purpose of this report is to examine the literature to compile a review of selected artifacts and pseudolesions that are commonly encountered when imaging the canine and feline brain. (C) 2010 Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, Vol. 51, No. 6, 2010, pp 587-595.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 595
页数:9
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Macroscopic susceptibility in ultra high field MRI. II: Acquisition of spin echo images from the human head [J].
Abduljalil, AM ;
Kangarlu, A ;
Yu, Y ;
Robitaille, PML .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1999, 23 (06) :842-844
[2]   Clinical usefulness of T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging of the CNS [J].
Adams, JG ;
Melhem, ER .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (02) :529-536
[3]   MR-IMAGING ARTIFACTS THAT SIMULATE DISEASE - HOW TO RECOGNIZE AND ELIMINATE THEM [J].
ARENA, L ;
MOREHOUSE, HT ;
SAFIR, J .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1995, 15 (06) :1373-1394
[4]  
BAGLEY R, 2005, FUNDAMENTALS VET CLI, P416
[5]   MR ARTIFACTS - A REVIEW [J].
BELLON, EM ;
HAACKE, EM ;
COLEMAN, PE ;
SACCO, DC ;
STEIGER, DA ;
GANGAROSA, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1986, 147 (06) :1271-1281
[6]   Comparison of fluid-attenuated in-version recovery and T2-weighted magnetic resonance images in dogs and cats with suspected brain disease [J].
Benigni, L ;
Lamb, CR .
VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2005, 46 (04) :287-292
[7]   T1 signal hyperintensity in the sellar region: Spectrum of findings [J].
Bonneville, Fabrice ;
Cattin, Francoise ;
Marsot-Dupuch, Kathlyn ;
Dormont, Didier ;
Bonneville, Jean-Francois ;
Chiras, Jacques .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2006, 26 (01) :93-U171
[8]   FLOWING CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID IN NORMAL AND HYDROCEPHALIC STATES - APPEARANCE ON MR IMAGES [J].
BRADLEY, WG ;
KORTMAN, KE ;
BURGOYNE, B .
RADIOLOGY, 1986, 159 (03) :611-616
[9]   BLOOD-FLOW - MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING [J].
BRADLEY, WG ;
WALUCH, V .
RADIOLOGY, 1985, 154 (02) :443-450
[10]  
BROOKS BS, 1989, AM J NEURORADIOL, V10, P943