A population-based outcomes study of patients with metastatic gastric cancer receiving second-line chemotherapy: A nationwide health insurance database study

被引:9
|
作者
Choi, In Sil [1 ]
Kim, Jee Hyun [2 ]
Lee, Ju Hyun [2 ]
Suh, Koung Jin [2 ]
Lee, Ji Yun [2 ]
Kim, Ji-Won [2 ]
Kim, Se-Hyun [2 ]
Kim, Jin Won [2 ]
Lee, Jeong-Ok [2 ]
Kim, Yu Jung [2 ]
Bang, Soo-Mee [2 ]
Lee, Jong Seok [2 ]
Lee, Keun-Wook [2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Boramae Med Ctr,Seoul Metropolitan Govt, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Seongnam, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
RANDOMIZED PHASE-III; SUPPORTIVE CARE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA; PLUS; FLUOROURACIL; OXALIPLATIN; LEUCOVORIN; CISPLATIN; TRIAL; 5-FLUOROURACIL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0205853
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose The survival benefit of second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) has recently been established. We conducted a nationwide population-based outcomes study of patients with MGC receiving second-line chemotherapy to better understand real-world treatment patterns and outcomes. Materials and methods Data were collected from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. We identified 509 newly diagnosed patients with MGC in 2010 who received second-line chemotherapy. These patients were divided into three groups for analyses: Group A comprised all patients who received second-line chemotherapy (N = 509); Group B comprised those who received fluoropyrimidine (Fp) plus platinum as first-line treatment, followed by irinotecan-based or taxane-based regimens as second-line chemotherapy (N = 284); and Group C comprised those who received Fp plus cisplatin as first-line treatment, followed by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/oxaliplatin, irinotecan-based, or taxane-based regimens as secondline chemotherapy (N = 184). Results Among patients who received first-line chemotherapy, 47.2% (509/1,078) continued to receive second-line chemotherapy. The most commonly used second-line chemotherapy regimens were 5-FU/irinotecan, 5-FU/oxaliplatin, and docetaxel. The median overall survival (OS) of all 509 patients was 5.2 months. The time from the start date of first-line chemotherapy to the start date of second-line chemotherapy > 6.1 months was an independent prognostic factor for improved OS. The type of chemotherapy regimen was not a significant factor affecting OS. Conclusion The findings provide a better understanding of second-line treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with MGC and will help guide treatment decisions in real-world clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A population-based outcomes study of patients with metastatic gastric cancer receiving second-line chemotherapy: A nationwide health insurance database study
    Lee, K-W.
    Choi, I. S.
    Kim, J. H.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [2] Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric cancer receiving third-line chemotherapy: A population-based outcomes study
    Choi, In Sil
    Choi, Mihong
    Lee, Ju Hyun
    Kim, Jee Hyun
    Suh, Koung Jin
    Lee, Ji Yun
    Kang, Beodeul
    Kim, Ji-Won
    Kim, Se-Hyun
    Kim, Jin Won
    Lee, Jeong-Ok
    Kim, Yu Jung
    Bang, Soo-Mee
    Lee, Jong Seok
    Lee, Keun-Wook
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [3] Second-Line Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer: a Retrospective Study
    Serkan YILDIRIM
    Ahmet Özveren
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 14 : 423 - 427
  • [4] Second-Line Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer: a Retrospective Study
    Yildirim, Serkan
    Ozveren, Ahmet
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 14 (02) : 423 - 427
  • [5] SECOND-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC GASTRIC CANCER: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS
    Alexandre, Maria Teresa
    Luis, Ana Carla
    Clara, Ana
    Fonseca, Vasco
    Freire, Joao
    Moreira, Antonio
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 49 - 49
  • [6] Second-line palliative systemic treatment for synchronous metastatic esophagogastric cancer: A population-based study
    Dijksterhuis, W. P. M.
    Verhoeven, R. H. A.
    Slingerland, M.
    Mohammad, N. Haj
    de Vos-Geelen, J.
    Beerepoot, L. V.
    Van Voorthuizen, T.
    Creemers, G-J.
    van Oijen, M.
    van Laarhoven, H. W. M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [7] Survival predictors for second-line chemotherapy in Caucasian patients with metastatic gastric cancer
    Bohanes, Pierre
    Courvoisier, Delphine S.
    Perneger, Thomas V.
    Morel, Philippe
    Huber, Olivier
    Roth, Arnaud D.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2011, 141
  • [8] A prognostic model in patients treated for metastatic gastric cancer with second-line chemotherapy
    Kanagavel, D.
    Pokataev, I. A.
    Fedyanin, M. Y.
    Tryakin, A. A.
    Bazin, I. S.
    Narimanov, M. N.
    Yakovleva, E. S.
    Garin, A. M.
    Tjulandin, S. A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 (09) : 1779 - 1785
  • [9] A PROGNOSTIC MODEL IN PATIENTS TREATED FOR METASTATIC GASTRIC CANCER WITH SECOND-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY
    Kanagavel, D.
    Bazin, I
    Narimanov, M.
    Garin, A.
    Tjulandin, S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 : 83 - 83
  • [10] Not only chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer
    Vasile, E.
    Caparello, C.
    Caponi, S.
    Ginocchi, L.
    Vivaldi, C.
    Musettini, G.
    Lucchesi, M.
    Lencioni, M.
    Falcone, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 (02) : 544 - 545