The institution-growth nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa: new evidence from heterogeneous panel causality approach

被引:1
作者
Hussen, Mohammed Seid [1 ]
Cokgezen, Murat [1 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Dept Econ, Goztepe Campus, TR-34722 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Institutional quality; Economic growth; SSA; Heterogonous panel causality; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; GRANGER CAUSALITY; COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1007/s40844-021-00225-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Whether economic growth is the cause or the consequence of improved institutional quality has been a controversial issue. To throw light on this debate, the present study aims to investigate the nature and direction of causality between institutional quality and economic growth. To this end, a panel data of 30 SSA countries for the 1990-2015 period is used and analyzed using a heterogeneous panel non-causality approach developed by Dumitrescu and Hurlin (Econ Model 29(4):1450-1460, 2012). Our empirical findings indicate a significant heterogeneity across the countries with regard to the relationship between growth and institutional quality, based on the income level. In low-income countries, we found a unidirectional causality that runs from institutional quality to growth. For lower-middle-income countries, however, the direction of causality is reversed. The evidence from this study also suggests a bidirectional causality in upper-middle-income countries. The policy implication of these findings is that policymakers in low-income countries should focus on institutional reform. Good quality institutions will promote economic growth that will ultimately turn into a cyclical process between economic growth and institutional development in later stages.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 157
页数:17
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Johnson, S ;
Robinson, JA .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (05) :1369-1401
[2]  
Acemoglu D., 2005, Handbook of Economic Growth 1A, V7, P385, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3, 10.1016/s1574-0684(05)01006-3]
[3]   Institutions, Human Capital, and Development [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Gallego, Francisco A. ;
Robinson, James A. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 6, 2014, 6 :875-912
[4]  
ALCHIAN AA, 1972, AM ECON REV, V62, P777
[5]  
Ang Y., 2016, CHINA ESCAPED POVERT, DOI [10.7591/9781501705854, DOI 10.7591/9781501705854]
[6]  
Asghar N., 2015, RES J S ASIAN STUDIE, V30, P381
[7]  
Barbieri Laura., 2009, Journal of Statistics: Advances in Theory and Applications, V1, P117
[8]   Institutional dualism and international development - A revisionist interpretation of good governance [J].
Brinkerhoff, DW ;
Goldsmith, AA .
ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2005, 37 (02) :199-224
[9]   Institutions and economic development: theory, policy and history [J].
Chang, Ha-Joon .
JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 7 (04) :473-498
[10]  
Chong Alberto., 2000, ECON POLIT-OXFORD, V12, P69, DOI DOI 10.1111/1468-0343.00069