Surgical resident involvement differentially affects patient outcomes in laparoscopic and open colectomy for malignancy

被引:14
作者
Sippey, Megan [1 ]
Spaniolas, Konstantinos [1 ]
Manwaring, Mark L. [1 ]
Pofahl, Walter E. [1 ]
Kasten, Kevin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] E Carolina Univ, Brody Sch Med, Dept Surg, 600 Moye Blvd,2MA234, Greenville, NC 27834 USA
关键词
NSQIP; Resident; Outcome; Cancer; Morbidity; Oncology; SSI; Colectomy; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; EVALUATING SURGERY RESIDENTS; PERFORMANCE RATING SYSTEM; COLORECTAL-CANCER SURGERY; 55,402 NSQIP PATIENTS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; OPERATIVE PERFORMANCE; QUALITY-IMPROVEMENT; ATTENDING SURGEONS; PARATHYROID SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.019
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: We evaluated effect of resident involvement on outcomes after laparoscopic and open colon resection for malignancy. METHODS: Patients undergoing colectomy were queried using the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. "Attending alone'' and "Resident'' cohorts were compared with primary end point of overall morbidity. RESULTS: Of 37,330 patients, residents were involved in 26,190 (70.2%) cases. Attending alone patients were older with higher vascular, cardiac, and pulmonary comorbidity. Univariate analysis demonstrated increased operative time (181.0 +/- 98.4 vs 138.7 +/- 77.0, P < .001), reoperation (5.7% vs 5.2%, P = .041), and readmission rates (11.9% vs 9.6%, P = .037) with resident involvement. Serious (16.0% vs 13.9%, P < .001), minor (17.5% vs 14.1%, P < .001), and overall morbidity (26.4% vs 22.5%, P < .001) were higher with resident participation. Mortality (2.0% vs 2.8%, P < .001) and failure to rescue (.8% vs 1.2%, P < .029) were lower with resident involvement. Resident involvement showed independent association with overall morbidity in both laparoscopic (odds ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.38, P < .001) and open cases (odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval, 1.18 to 1.35, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Resident participation in colectomy for malignancy is associated with lower mortality at the expense of higher overall morbidity. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1026 / 1034
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of Resident Involvement on Trauma Patient Outcomes: A Single-Institution Review
    Elkahly, Mohamed
    Vong, Vinson
    Chawla-Kondal, Bhani
    Ayutyanont, Napatkamon
    Sheets, Nicholas
    Kim, Tommy
    Mahmoud, Ahmed
    Plurad, David
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 80 (02) : 288 - 293
  • [32] Laparoscopic-assisted vs. Open Colectomy for Cancer: Comparison of Short-term Outcomes from 121 Hospitals
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    Bentrem, David J.
    Merkow, Ryan P.
    Nelson, Heidi
    Wang, Edward
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Soper, Nathaniel J.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2008, 12 (11) : 2001 - 2009
  • [33] Laparoscopic-assisted vs. Open Colectomy for Cancer: Comparison of Short-term Outcomes from 121 Hospitals
    Karl Y. Bilimoria
    David J. Bentrem
    Ryan P. Merkow
    Heidi Nelson
    Edward Wang
    Clifford Y. Ko
    Nathaniel J. Soper
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2008, 12
  • [34] Using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data for risk adjustment to compare Clavien 4 and 5 complications in open and laparoscopic colectomy
    Webb, Shawn
    Rubinfeld, Ilan
    Velanovich, Vic
    Horst, H. M.
    Reickert, Craig
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (03): : 732 - 737
  • [35] Optimizing surgical outcomes in gastric cancer: a comparison of laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy
    De Martino, Julien
    Challine, Alexandre
    Collard, Maxime K.
    Lefevre, Jeremie H.
    Parc, Yann
    Paye, Francois
    Voron, Thibault
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2025, 29 (03)
  • [36] Comparable Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality After Laparoscopic and Open Emergent Restorative Colectomy: Outcomes From the ACS NSQIP
    Ballian, Nikiforos
    Weisensel, Natalie
    Rajamanickam, Victoria
    Foley, Eugene F.
    Heise, Charles P.
    Harms, Bruce A.
    Kennedy, Gregory D.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (10) : 2488 - 2496
  • [37] Surgical trends and outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic colostomy reversal for benign disease
    Katsura, Morihiro
    Ashbrook, Matthew
    Ikenoue, Tatsuyoshi
    Takahashi, Kyosuke
    Ito, Masaki A.
    Martin, Matthew J.
    Inaba, Kenji
    Matsushima, Kazuhide
    SURGERY, 2024, 176 (05) : 1366 - 1373
  • [38] Comparison of long-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted and open colectomy for splenic flexure cancer
    Chi, Zhaocheng
    Li, Zhe
    Cheng, Longwei
    Wang, Can
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2018, 23 (02): : 322 - 328
  • [39] Surgical Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Open Resection for Primary Sinonasal Malignancy: A Meta-analysis
    Lu, Victor M.
    Ravindran, Krishnan
    Phan, Kevin
    Van Gompel, Amie J.
    Smith, Timothy R.
    Donaldson, Angela M.
    Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
    Mekary, Rania A.
    Chaichana, Kaisorn L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2019, 33 (05) : 608 - 616
  • [40] Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: analysis of trends in surgical techniques, patient selection, and outcomes
    Malleo, Giuseppe
    Damoli, Isacco
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Esposito, Alessandro
    Marchese, Tiziana
    Salvia, Roberto
    Bassi, Claudio
    Butturini, Giovanni
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (07): : 1952 - 1962