Impact of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction on Image Quality of Contrast-Enhanced Neck CT

被引:20
作者
Gaddikeri, S. [1 ]
Andre, J. B. [1 ]
Benjert, J. [2 ]
Hippe, D. S. [3 ]
Anzai, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Dept Neuroradiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Neuroradiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Radiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
FILTERED BACK-PROJECTION; MULTIDETECTOR ROW CT; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; DOSE REDUCTION; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; HELICAL CT; OPTIMIZATION; STRATEGIES; 64-MDCT; CANCER;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A4123
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Improved image quality is clinically desired for contrast-enhanced CT of the neck. We compared 30% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms for the assessment of image quality of contrast-enhanced CT of the neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Neck contrast-enhanced CT data from 64 consecutive patients were reconstructed retrospectively by using 30% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction. Objective image quality was assessed by comparing SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio, and background noise at levels 1 (mandible) and 2 (superior mediastinum). Two independent blinded readers subjectively graded the image quality on a scale of 1-5, (grade 5 = excellent image quality without artifacts and grade 1 = nondiagnostic image quality with significant artifacts). The percentage of agreement and disagreement between the 2 readers was assessed. RESULTS: Compared with 30% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, model-based iterative reconstruction significantly improved the SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio at levels 1 and 2. Model-based iterative reconstruction also decreased background noise at level] (P = .016), though there was no difference at level 2 (P = .61). Model-based iterative reconstruction was scored higher than 30% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction by both reviewers at the nasopharynx (P < .001) and oropharynx (P < .001) and for overall image quality (P < .001) and was scored lower at the vocal cords (P < .001) and sternoclavicular junction (P < .001), due to artifacts related to thyroid shielding that were specific for model-based iterative reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Model-based iterative reconstruction offers improved subjective and objective image quality as evidenced by a higher SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio and lower background noise within the same dataset for contrast-enhanced neck CT. Model-based iterative reconstruction has the potential to reduce the radiation dose while maintaining the image quality, with a minor downside being prominent artifacts related to thyroid shield use on model-based iterative reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 396
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   Iterative reconstruction for helical CT: a simulation study [J].
Nuyts, J ;
De Man, B ;
Dupont, P ;
Defrise, M ;
Suetens, P ;
Mortelmans, L .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (04) :729-737
[22]   Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Versus Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction and Filtered Back Projection in Liver 64-MDCT: Focal Lesion Detection, Lesion Conspicuity, and Image Noise [J].
Shuman, William P. ;
Green, Doug E. ;
Busey, Janet M. ;
Kolokythas, Orpheus ;
Mitsumori, Lee M. ;
Koprowicz, Kent M. ;
Thibault, Jean-Baptiste ;
Hsieh, Jiang ;
Alessio, Adam M. ;
Choi, Eunice ;
Kinahan, Paul E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (05) :1071-1076
[23]   Innovations in CT Dose Reduction Strategy: Application of the Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm [J].
Silva, Alvin C. ;
Lawder, Holly J. ;
Hara, Amy ;
Kujak, Jennifer ;
Pavlicek, William .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (01) :191-199
[24]   Abdominal CT: Comparison of Adaptive Statistical Iterative and Filtered Back Projection Reconstruction Techniques [J].
Singh, Sarabjeet ;
Kalra, Mannudeep K. ;
Hsieh, Jiang ;
Licato, Paul E. ;
Do, Synho ;
Pien, Homer H. ;
Blake, Michael A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 257 (02) :373-383
[25]   Recurrent CT, Cumulative Radiation Exposure, and Associated Radiation-induced Cancer Risks from CT of Adults [J].
Sodickson, Aaron ;
Baeyens, Pieter F. ;
Andriole, Katherine P. ;
Prevedello, Luciano M. ;
Nawfel, Richard D. ;
Hanson, Richard ;
Khorasani, Ramin .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 251 (01) :175-184
[26]   A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT [J].
Thibault, Jean-Baptiste ;
Sauer, Ken D. ;
Bouman, Charles A. ;
Hsieh, Jiang .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (11) :4526-4544
[27]   Radiation dose reduction in soft tissue neck CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) [J].
Vachha, Behroze ;
Brodoefel, Harald ;
Wilcox, Carol ;
Hackney, David B. ;
Moonis, Gul .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (12) :2222-2226
[28]   Model-based Iterative Reconstruction and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Techniques in Abdominal CT: Comparison of Image Quality in the Detection of Colorectal Liver Metastases [J].
Volders, David ;
Bols, Alain ;
Haspeslagh, Marc ;
Coenegrachts, Kenneth .
RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (02) :468-473
[29]   CT scanning: A major source of radiation exposure [J].
Wiest, PW ;
Locken, JA ;
Heintz, PH ;
Mettler, FA .
SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2002, 23 (05) :402-410
[30]   Model-based iterative reconstruction for reduction of radiation dose in abdominopelvic CT: comparison to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction [J].
Yasaka, Koichiro ;
Katsura, Masaki ;
Akahane, Masaaki ;
Sato, Jiro ;
Matsuda, Izuru ;
Ohtomo, Kuni .
SPRINGERPLUS, 2013, 2 :1-9