Impact of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction on Image Quality of Contrast-Enhanced Neck CT

被引:20
作者
Gaddikeri, S. [1 ]
Andre, J. B. [1 ]
Benjert, J. [2 ]
Hippe, D. S. [3 ]
Anzai, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Dept Neuroradiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Neuroradiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Radiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
FILTERED BACK-PROJECTION; MULTIDETECTOR ROW CT; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; DOSE REDUCTION; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; HELICAL CT; OPTIMIZATION; STRATEGIES; 64-MDCT; CANCER;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A4123
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Improved image quality is clinically desired for contrast-enhanced CT of the neck. We compared 30% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms for the assessment of image quality of contrast-enhanced CT of the neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Neck contrast-enhanced CT data from 64 consecutive patients were reconstructed retrospectively by using 30% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction. Objective image quality was assessed by comparing SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio, and background noise at levels 1 (mandible) and 2 (superior mediastinum). Two independent blinded readers subjectively graded the image quality on a scale of 1-5, (grade 5 = excellent image quality without artifacts and grade 1 = nondiagnostic image quality with significant artifacts). The percentage of agreement and disagreement between the 2 readers was assessed. RESULTS: Compared with 30% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, model-based iterative reconstruction significantly improved the SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio at levels 1 and 2. Model-based iterative reconstruction also decreased background noise at level] (P = .016), though there was no difference at level 2 (P = .61). Model-based iterative reconstruction was scored higher than 30% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction by both reviewers at the nasopharynx (P < .001) and oropharynx (P < .001) and for overall image quality (P < .001) and was scored lower at the vocal cords (P < .001) and sternoclavicular junction (P < .001), due to artifacts related to thyroid shielding that were specific for model-based iterative reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Model-based iterative reconstruction offers improved subjective and objective image quality as evidenced by a higher SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio and lower background noise within the same dataset for contrast-enhanced neck CT. Model-based iterative reconstruction has the potential to reduce the radiation dose while maintaining the image quality, with a minor downside being prominent artifacts related to thyroid shield use on model-based iterative reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 396
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Dose and image quality of high-pitch dual source computed tomography for the evaluation of cervical lymph node status - Comparison to regular 128-slice single source computed tomography [J].
Bodelle, Boris ;
Bauer, Ralf W. ;
Holthaus, Lara ;
Schulz, Boris ;
Al-Butmeh, Firas ;
Wichmann, Julian L. ;
Beeres, Martin ;
Vogl, Thomas J. ;
Kerl, J. Matthias .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (06) :E281-E285
[2]   Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD ;
Hall, EJ ;
Berdon, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :289-296
[3]   Computed tomography-old ideas and new technology [J].
Fleischmann, Dominik ;
Boas, F. Edward .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (03) :510-517
[4]   Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality [J].
Geleijns, J. ;
Salvado Artells, M. ;
Veldkamp, W. J. H. ;
Lopez Tortosa, M. ;
Calzado Cantera, A. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (10) :2334-2340
[5]   Impact of iterative reconstruction on CNR and SNR in dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging in an animal model [J].
Gramer, B. M. ;
Muenzel, D. ;
Leber, V. ;
von Thaden, A. -K. ;
Feussner, H. ;
Schneider, A. ;
Vembar, M. ;
Soni, N. ;
Rummeny, E. J. ;
Huber, A. M. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (12) :2654-2661
[6]   Dose reduction in computed tomography by attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current: evaluation of six anatomical regions [J].
Greess, H ;
Wolf, H ;
Baum, U ;
Lell, M ;
Pirkl, M ;
Kalender, W ;
Bautz, WA .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (02) :391-394
[7]   Radiation Dose to the Thyroid Gland and Breast From Multidetector Computed Tomography of the Cervical Spine: Does Bismuth Shielding With and Without a Cervical Collar Reduce Dose? [J].
Gunn, Martin L. ;
Kanal, Kalpana M. ;
Kolokythas, Orpheus ;
Anzai, Yoshimi .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2009, 33 (06) :987-990
[8]   Multi-detector row CT: Radiation dose characteristics [J].
Hamberg, LM ;
Rhea, JT ;
Hunter, GJ ;
Thrall, JH .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (03) :762-772
[9]   Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Reducing Body Radiation Dose at CT: Feasibility Study [J].
Hara, Amy K. ;
Paden, Robert G. ;
Silva, Alvin C. ;
Kujak, Jennifer L. ;
Lawder, Holly J. ;
Pavlicek, William .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (03) :764-771
[10]   Spiral CT and radiation dose [J].
Imhof, H ;
Schibany, N ;
Ba-Ssalamah, A ;
Czerny, C ;
Hojreh, A ;
Kainberger, F ;
Krestan, C ;
Kudler, H ;
Nöbauer, I ;
Nowotny, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 47 (01) :29-37