The accuracy of measures in screening adults for spiritual suffering in health care settings: A systematic review

被引：22

作者：

Bahraini, Sayna ^{[1
]}

Gifford, Wendy ^{[1
]}

Graham, Ian D. ^{[2
]}

Wazni, Liquaa ^{[1
]}

Bremault-Phillips, Suzette ^{[3
]}

Hackbusch, Rebekah ^{[4
]}

Demers, Catrine ^{[5
]}

Egan, Mary ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Nursing, Ottawa, ON, Canada

[2] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol Publ Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada

[3] Univ Alberta, Sch Occupat Therapy, Calgary, AB, Canada

[4] Bruyere Continuing Care St Vincent Hosp, Therapeut Support Serv, Ottawa, ON, Canada

[5] Univ Ottawa, Sch Rehabil Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada

来源：

PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE | 2020年 / 18卷 / 01期

关键词：

Screening; suffering; spirituality; diagnostic test accuracy; systematic review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ILL ELDERLY-PATIENTS; PALLIATIVE CARE; RELIGIOUS STRUGGLE; CANCER-PATIENTS; DISTRESS; WOMEN; PAIN;

D O I：

10.1017/S1478951519000506

中图分类号：

R19 [保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Objective Guidelines for palliative and spiritual care emphasize the importance of screening patients for spiritual suffering. The aim of this review was to synthesize the research evidence of the accuracy of measures used to screen adults for spiritual suffering. Methods A systematic review of the literature. We searched five scientific databases to identify relevant articles. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted data, and assessed study methodological quality. Results We identified five articles that yielded information on 24 spiritual screening measures. Among all identified measures, the two-item Meaning/Joy & Self-Described Struggle has the highest sensitivity (82-87%), and the revised Rush protocol had the highest specificity (81-90%). The methodological quality of all included studies was low.

引用

页码：89 / 102

页数：14

共 44 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2009, J PASTORAL CARE COUN

[2]

[Anonymous], 2013, MODEL GUIDE HOSPICE

[3]

[Anonymous], 2015, JOANN BRIGGS I REV M

[4]

[Anonymous], 2013, SPIR CAR NAT WID GUI